IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bum/cactus/v6y2024i1p5-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Corporate Culture: Perspectives From Generation Z Business Students

Author

Listed:
  • Vlad Diaconescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This research is a qualitative study based on the focus group technique and examines the opinion of business students, as a niche of Generation Z, in relation to organizational culture and its role in choosing and keeping a job. For this purpose, 3 focus groups were conducted with students from the Faculty of Business and Tourism of the Bucharest University of Economic Studies. The first focus group had only 3 participants and served more to test the discussion guide. The next two focus groups had 10 and 12 participants respectively, boys and girls, with the difference that the second group consisted of undergraduate students and the third of students in a master's program. A surprising finding was that none of the 25 student participants in the 3 focus groups were familiar with the concept of organizational culture. However, after some brief explanations, they understood what theconcept referred to and were able to participate in in-depth discussions. The key findings made it clear that GenZ students are looking for companies with a positive culture and a workplace that allows them to have a goodwork- life balance. These aspects become even more important than a higher salary if it is to be achieved in a company with a toxic culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlad Diaconescu, 2024. "Navigating Corporate Culture: Perspectives From Generation Z Business Students," Cactus - The tourism journal for research, education, culture and soul, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 6(1), pages 5-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:bum:cactus:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:5-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cactus-journal-of-tourism.ase.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/II.1-Diaconescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pichler, Shaun & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Granitz, Neil, 2021. "DITTO for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 599-610.
    2. Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska & G. Scott Erickson, 2020. "A person-organization fit Model of Generation Z: Preliminary studies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(4), pages 149-176.
    3. Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2009. "Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 102-113.
    4. Gabrielova, Karina & Buchko, Aaron A., 2021. "Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 489-499.
    5. Costanza, David P. & Finkelstein, Lisa M., 2015. "Generationally Based Differences in the Workplace: Is There a There There?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 308-323, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Osorio, María Lucila & Madero, Sergio, 2025. "Explaining Gen Z’s desire for hybrid work in corporate, family, and entrepreneurial settings," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 83-93.
    2. Hazem Ali & Min Li & Xunmin Qiu, 2024. "Examination of HRM practices in relation to the retention of Chinese Gen Z employees," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Alpana Taneja & Vinay Goyal & Kunjana Malik, 2023. "Sustainability‐oriented innovations – Enhancing factors and consequences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2747-2765, November.
    4. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    5. Marioara Pascu & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu, 2021. "The Assessment of the Authenticity and Conservation Status of Cultural Landscapes in Southern Transylvania (Romania)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Rodrigo Lozano, 2015. "A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 32-44, January.
    7. Agnieszka Laskowska & Jan Franciszek Laskowski, 2022. "“Silver” Generation at Work—Implications for Sustainable Human Capital Management in the Industry 5.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Chin-Wen Chang & Sheng-Hsiung Chang, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Disruption: Influences of Digital Media and Social Networks on Forming Digital Natives’ Attitude," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    9. Agnieszka Laskowska & Jan Laskowski, 2021. "Expectations of Young People Towards Their Future Work and Career After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Outbreak in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 17-34.
    10. Tomina Saveanu & Daniel Badulescu & Sorana Saveanu & Maria-Madela Abrudan & Alina Badulescu, 2021. "The Role of Owner-Managers in Shaping CSR Activity of Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Daniel Etse & Adela McMurray & Nuttawuth Muenjohn, 2022. "The Effect of Regulation on Sustainable Procurement: Organisational Leadership and Culture as Mediators," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 305-325, May.
    12. Lingfu Zhang & Yongfang Dou & Hailing Wang, 2025. "How Enterprise Resilience Affects Enterprise Sustainable Development—Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Chaojun Li & Xinjia Huang, 2022. "How Does COVID-19 Risk Perception Affect Wellness Tourist Intention: Findings on Chinese Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Gustavo Adolfo García & Diego René Gonzales Miranda & Oscar Gallo & Juan Pablo Roman Calderon, 2020. "Millennials and the gender wage gap: Do millennial women face a glass ceiling?," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 18409, Universidad EAFIT.
    15. Hyo-Sun Jung & Hye-Hyun Yoon, 2021. "Generational Effects of Workplace Flexibility on Work Engagement, Satisfaction, and Commitment in South Korean Deluxe Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Zhanna Mingaleva & Elena Shironina & Elena Lobova & Vasiliy Olenev & Lyubov Plyusnina & Anna Oborina, 2022. "Organizational Culture Management as an Element of Innovative and Sustainable Development of Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    17. Muhammad Jawad Iqbal & Hafiz Muhammad Usman Khizar, 2022. "The Epistemology of Entrepreneurial Responsible Orientation (ERO): Theory, Conceptualization, and Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    18. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:102-119 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Wim Lambrechts & Andrew Mitchell & Mark Lemon & Muhammad Usman Mazhar & Ward Ooms & Rikkert van Heerde, 2021. "The Transition of Dutch Social Housing Corporations to Sustainable Business Models for New Buildings and Retrofits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Katarzyna Gadomska‐Lila & Agata Sudolska & Justyna Łapińska, 2024. "The importance of green competencies in advancing organizational sustainability: The empirical perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1152-1169, February.
    21. Shen, Famei & Li, Jie & Chen, Jianghang & Wang, Wangshuai, 2023. "Exploring young consumers’ intention to pay for shared express packaging: A multi-study analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Generation Z; organizational culture; workplace expectations; focus group;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bum:cactus:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:5-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Bulin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.