IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v10y2019i4p11n3.html

Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Phillips Susan D.

    (School of Public Policy and Administratio, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S5B6, Canada)

Abstract

Investigations of how Oxfam Great Britain (GB) managed its safeguarding systems and handled revelations of sexual exploitation by its staff highlighted a variety of internal governance and culture issues, and a lack of transparency as it sought to protect its reputation. The current models of reputation management do not fully explain its actions, however. This article argues that five systemic factors in the environment in which nonprofits operate create undue pressures for protection of reputations and contribute to poor assessment of risks, inadequate accountability systems and limited transparency. These factors include: a stress on success and related competition for market share and pressures for growth; expectations of low overheads; challenges of governance and risk management; lack of public awareness; and regulatory gaps. Drawing on media coverage and the commissions of inquiry, the analysis shows how all of these contextual factors were at play in the Oxfam case, and suggests potential reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillips Susan D., 2019. "Putting Humpty Together Again: How Reputation Regulation Fails the Charitable Sector," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:11:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2019-0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0032
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2019-0032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diarmuid McDonnell & Alasdair C. Rutherford, 2019. "Promoting charity accountability: understanding disclosure of serious incidents," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 42-61, January.
    2. Fox, Jonathan A, 2007. "The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability," Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, Working Paper Series qt8c25c3z4, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz.
    3. Mary Gugerty, 2009. "Signaling virtue: voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(3), pages 243-273, August.
    4. Busuioc, E. M. & Lodge, Martin, 2017. "Reputation and accountability relationships: managing accountability expectations through reputation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67152, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Yuri Mishina & Emily S. Block & Michael J. Mannor, 2012. "The path dependence of organizational reputation: how social judgment influences assessments of capability and character," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 459-477, May.
    6. Gordon, Teresa P. & Knock, Cathryn L. & Neely, Daniel G., 2009. "The role of rating agencies in the market for charitable contributions: An empirical test," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 469-484, November.
    7. Jonathan Meer, 2017. "Are overhead costs a good guide for charitable giving?," World of Labour, LISER, pages 329-329, January.
    8. George E. Mitchell & Sarah S. Stroup, 2017. "The reputations of NGOs: Peer evaluations of effectiveness," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 397-419, September.
    9. Angela M. Crack, 2016. "Reversing the Telescope: Evaluating NGO Peer Regulation Initiatives," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 40-56, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitchell George E. & Calabrese Thad D., 2020. "Instrumental Philanthropy, Nonprofit Theory, and Information Costs," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Jurgen Willems & Lewis Faulk, 2019. "Does voluntary disclosure matter when organizations violate stakeholder trust?," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(1).
    3. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Keke Song, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Standards in the Relationship Between Religious Social Norms and M&A Announcement Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 721-742, May.
    4. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Mariconda, Simone & Lurati, Francesco, 2015. "Does familiarity breed stability? The role of familiarity in moderating the effects of new information on reputation judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 957-964.
    6. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.
    7. Ogbe, Michael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Spatial crowdsourcing in natural resource revenue management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Wang, David Han-Min & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Chiang, Chia-Hsin, 2016. "Exploring the value relevance of corporate reputation: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1329-1332.
    9. Vika Annisa Qurrata & Muhammad Hakimi Mohd. Shafiai & Hairunnizam Wahid & Suhaili Almaamun & Abdul Ghafar Ismail, 2025. "Institutional Economics from Islamic Perspective: With Special Reference to Waqf," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    10. Cyril Benoît, 2021. "Politicians, regulators, and regulatory governance: The neglected sides of the story," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 8-22, November.
    11. Craig Carroll & Rowena Olegario, 2020. "Pathways to Corporate Accountability: Corporate Reputation and Its Alternatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 173-181, May.
    12. Kwanho Suk & Triza Mudita, 2021. "Charitable Organizations’ Cost Disclosure Mitigates Overhead Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Khirul Basar Mim & Tunmin (Catherine) Jai & Stacy H. Lee, 2022. "The Influence of Sustainable Positioning on eWOM and Brand Loyalty: Analysis of Credible Sources and Transparency Practices Based on the S-O-R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Lynn M. Shore & James H. Dulebohn & Chenwei Liao & Karen H. Ehrhart, 2025. "Impact of Recruiter Employee–Organization Relationship on Job Seeker Application Behaviour," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(3), pages 546-560, September.
    15. Hoeft, Leonard & Mill, Wladislaw, 2024. "Abuse of power," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 305-324.
    16. Tohari, Achmad & Parsons, Christopher & Rammohan, Anu, 2017. "Does Information Empower the Poor? Evidence from Indonesia's Social Security Card," IZA Discussion Papers 11137, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Zhaokun Guo & Weiyan Jiang & Kunhui Ye, 2025. "Interplay of ESG, Trust, and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence From China’s Listed Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    18. Jeffrey A. Chandler & Marcus T. Wolfe & Pyayt P. Oo, 2025. "Striking a Balance: The Effect of Capability and Character Reputation Claims on Crowdfunding Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(2), pages 461-501, March.
    19. A. J. Guerber & Vikas Anand & Alan E. Ellstrand & Matthew A. Waller & Iris Reychav, 2020. "Extending the Situational Crisis Communication Theory: The Impact of Linguistic Style and Culture," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 106-127, May.
    20. Michele Fioretti & Victor Saint-Jean & Simon C. Smith, 2024. "NGO Activism: Exposure vs. Influence," Papers 2411.06875, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:10:y:2019:i:4:p:11:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.