IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/germec/v11y2010i3p302-335.html

Market Efficiency Reloaded: Why Insider Trades do not Reveal Exploitable Information

Author

Listed:
  • Dickgiesser Sebastian

    (Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS),Munich, Germany)

  • Kaserer Christoph

    (Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS),Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Several studies have emphasized a slow price adjustment to reported insider trades for Germany. The results presented in this paper, though, show that this is mainly caused by a subset of high arbitrage risk stocks. In fact, the abnormal return difference between the quintiles of stocks with highest and lowest idiosyncratic risk is in the range of 2.99-4.90% over a 20-day interval. These results are robust even in the context of a joint generalized least squares approach. By developing a simple zero-investment arbitrage trading strategy mimicking insider trades, it turns out that such a trading strategy, in most cases, generates significant positive returns as long as transaction costs are neglected. However, the out-performance disappears in all risk quintiles, if bid/ask spreads are taken into account.We conclude that the market’s under-reaction to reported insider trades can mainly be explained by the cost of risky arbitrage and is therefore not exploitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Dickgiesser Sebastian & Kaserer Christoph, 2010. "Market Efficiency Reloaded: Why Insider Trades do not Reveal Exploitable Information," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 302-335, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:germec:v:11:y:2010:i:3:p:302-335
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00476.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00476.x
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00476.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolai Bissantz & Verena Steinorth & Daniel Ziggel, 2011. "Stabilität von Diversifikationseffekten im Markowitz-Modell," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 5(2), pages 145-157, August.
    2. Hussmann, Helge & Fieberg, Christian, 2014. "10 Jahre Directors’ Dealings in Deutschland – Gesetzliche Regelungen, empirische Entwicklung und Forschungsstand," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 68(1), pages 47-64.
    3. Kaserer Christoph & Hanauer Matthias X., 2017. "25 Jahre Fama-French-Modell: Erklärungsgehalt, Anomalien und praktische Implikationen," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 98-116, June.
    4. Shallu Arora & Meena Sharma & A. K. Vashisht, 2017. "Impact of managerial ability and firm-specific variables on insider’s abnormal returns," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 44(4), pages 275-286, December.
    5. Oenschläger, Eike & Möllenhoff, Steffen, 2025. "Insider filings as trading signals — Does it pay to be fast?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:germec:v:11:y:2010:i:3:p:302-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.