IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/wireae/v11y2022i6ne449.html

The decarbonization transition and U.S. electricity markets: Impacts and innovations

Author

Listed:
  • John P. Banks

Abstract

Several factors in recent years have converged in the U.S. to spur a focused effort on decarbonizing the electricity sector. First, in response to the threat of climate change, policy at all levels of governance is increasingly promoting and incentivizing the deployment of zero carbon solutions, especially variable renewable energy (VRE) sources such as utility‐scale wind and solar PV, as well as distributed energy resources (DERs) such as rooftop solar PV and battery energy storage systems. Second, the costs of these technologies have declined to result in major increases in their market penetration. Finally, in response to greater access to cheaper, clean technology solutions, customers have become more engaged and proactive in their energy choices, both as a way to lower energy costs and to be more environmentally responsible. These de‐carbonization dynamics are impacting electricity markets—those where competition has been introduced (restructured markets), as well as those where vertically integrated utilities maintain a monopoly (regulated markets). For example, increasing penetration of VRE has influenced wholesale market prices, and many of the organized wholesale markets have implemented initiatives to add greater flexibility in their market operations to accommodate larger amounts of VRE. In regulated markets, policy makers and regulators in many states are assessing a variety of changes in the existing regulatory framework to adapt to more DERs. This overview identifies the impacts of more VREs and DERs on each market structure, and describes key adaptations and changes in each market to accommodate these de‐carbonization trends. This article is categorized under: Climate and Environment > Net Zero Planning and Decarbonization Energy and Power Systems > Energy Infrastructure Policy and Economics > Energy Transitions

Suggested Citation

  • John P. Banks, 2022. "The decarbonization transition and U.S. electricity markets: Impacts and innovations," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:wireae:v:11:y:2022:i:6:n:e449
    DOI: 10.1002/wene.449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.449
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/wene.449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aen:journl:2006v27-01-a01 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. John Kwoka & Michael Pollitt & Sanem Sergici, 2010. "Divestiture policy and operating efficiency in U.S. electric power distribution," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 86-109, August.
    3. Steve Cicala, 2015. "When Does Regulation Distort Costs? Lessons from Fuel Procurement in US Electricity Generation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 411-444, January.
    4. Kraan, Oscar & Kramer, Gert Jan & Nikolic, Igor & Chappin, Emile & Koning, Vinzenz, 2019. "Why fully liberalised electricity markets will fail to meet deep decarbonisation targets even with strong carbon pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 99-110.
    5. Paul L. Joskow, 1989. "Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform, and Structural Change in the Electrical Power Industry," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 20(1989 Micr), pages 125-208.
    6. Job Taminiau & John P. Banks & Deborah Bleviss & John Byrne, 2019. "Advancing transformative sustainability: A comparative analysis of electricity service and supply innovators in the United States," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(4), July.
    7. Liparidis, George & Pak, Alvin S., 1993. "Get ready for the newest competitor: The vertically integrated utility," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 54-62, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang Hua Cao & Han Qi & Chi-Keung Woo & Jay Zarnikau & Raymond Li, 2024. "Efficient Frontiers for Short-term Sales of Spot and Forward Wind Energy in Texas," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(6), pages 37-60, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Chang & Guo, Yue & Yang, Yu & Chen, Shiyi, 2022. "The environmental benefits of electricity industry restructuring in China: Ownership mixing vs. vertical unbundling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Amit Nandan & Hrushikesh Mallick, 2021. "Does regulation induce cost efficiency in electricity distribution utilities? Use of stochastic cost frontier analysis for the Indian states," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(2), pages 127-159, June.
    3. Tin Cheuk Leung & Kwok Ping Ping & Kevin K. Tsui, 2019. "What can deregulators deregulate? The case of electricity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Magnus Söderberg, 2008. "Uncertainty and regulatory outcome in the Swedish electricity distribution sector," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-94, February.
    5. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Paul L. Joskow, 2006. "Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment," The Energy Journal, , vol. 27(1), pages 1-36, January.
    7. Jose Miguel Abito & Jin Soo Han & Jean‐François Houde & Arthur A. van Benthem, 2024. "Agency Frictions and Procurement: New Evidence from U.S. Electricity Restructuring," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 20-48, March.
    8. Zhang, Zibin & Yang, Wenxin & Ye, Jianliang, 2021. "Why sulfur dioxide emissions decline significantly from coal-fired power plants in China? Evidence from the desulfurated electricity pricing premium program," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    9. Gomez-Trejos, Felipe, 2025. "Dynamic welfare implications of market-based climate policy under demand uncertainty," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Paul L. Joskow, 2001. "California's Electricity Crisis," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 365-388.
    11. Wadim Strielkowski & Dalia Streimikiene & Alena Fomina & Elena Semenova, 2019. "Internet of Energy (IoE) and High-Renewables Electricity System Market Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Fariba F. Mamaghani & Metin Çakanyildirim, 2024. "Harvesting Solar Power Foments Prices in a Vicious Cycle: Breaking the Cycle with Price Mechanisms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(4), pages 1505-1525, July.
    13. repec:aen:journl:ej37-4-kahnlang is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Jesse Buchsbaum & Catherine Hausman & Johanna L Mathieu & Jing Peng, 2024. "Spillovers from ancillary services to wholesale energy markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 55(1), pages 87-111, March.
    15. Pablo David Necoechea-Porras & Asunción López & Juan Carlos Salazar-Elena, 2021. "Deregulation in the Energy Sector and Its Economic Effects on the Power Sector: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Guthrie, Graeme, 2020. "Regulation, welfare, and the risk of asset stranding," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 273-287.
    17. Didier Chabaud & Parthenay Claude & Yannick Perez, 2005. "Environnement institutionnel et trajectoire des entreprises, une analyse northienne de l'industrie électrique," Post-Print hal-01660452, HAL.
    18. Stratford Douglas & Seth Wiggins, 2015. "Effects of Acid Rain Regulations on Production of Eastern Coals of Varying Sulfur Content," Working Papers 15-38, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    19. David E. M. Sappington & Dennis L. Weisman, 2024. "40 Years of Incentive Regulation: What Have We Learned, and What Questions Remain?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 65(2), pages 361-373, September.
    20. Fan Wu & Yi Xin, 2024. "Estimating Nonseparable Selection Models: A Functional Contraction Approach," Papers 2411.01799, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    21. Robin Taylor & William Bodel & Anthony Banford & Gregg Butler & Francis Livens, 2024. "Sustainability of Nuclear Energy—A Critical Review from a UK Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-47, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:wireae:v:11:y:2022:i:6:n:e449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2041-8396 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.