IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v25y2008i2p249-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A score card for ethical decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Parra‐Luna

Abstract

General Systems Theory has not tackled the problem of a generally applicable model of human needs, although mention must be made of the works of Terleckyi, van Gigh, Hall, Buchanan and others, who have come closest to it. However, the sociosystemic approach as a whole, which could have been expected to focus on the theoretical and ultimately empirical teleology of social systems (the description and measurement of their goals and therefore their progression/regression as a core task) has not adopted necessarily a ‘sociologising’ point of view, that is to say, it does not contemplate the system from the point of view of the man in the street. This has led to forgetting the central and ultimate aim of Sociology as a science which has to account for collective as opposed to individual efficiency. With a view to merely suggesting an ethical reflection along these lines, I present an axiological approach for calculating the concept of Organizational Efficiency. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Parra‐Luna, 2008. "A score card for ethical decision making," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 249-270, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:25:y:2008:i:2:p:249-270
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.883
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Rothenberg, 2003. "Knowledge Content and Worker Participation in Environmental Management at NUMMI," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1783-1802, November.
    2. Janowicz, M.K. & Noorderhaven, N.G., 2002. "The Role of Trust in Interorganizational Learning in Joint Ventures," Other publications TiSEM f10debea-9d7b-47c3-8d4f-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Currall, Steven C. & Judge, Timothy A., 1995. "Measuring Trust between Organizational Boundary Role Persons," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 151-170, November.
    4. Janowicz, M.K. & Noorderhaven, N.G., 2002. "The Role of Trust in Interorganizational Learning in Joint Ventures," Discussion Paper 2002-119, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rycroft, Robert W., 2006. "Time and technological innovation: Implications for public policy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 281-301.
    2. Thomas Reverdy, 2006. "ISO 14001 implementation: translation process and organizational change," Post-Print halshs-00134707, HAL.
    3. Tobias Hahn & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge, 2015. "Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 297-316, March.
    4. Dirk Clercq & Lianxi Zhou & Aiqi Wu, 2016. "Unpacking the relationship between young ventures’ international learning effort and performance in the context of an emerging economy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 47-66, March.
    5. Karanges, Emma Ruth & Beatson, Amanda & Johnston, Kim & Lings, Ian, 2014. "Optimizing employee engagement with internal communication: A social exchange perspective," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 7(2), pages 329-353.
    6. Roxanne Zolin & Deborah E. Gibbons, 2014. "How Emergent Roles and Structures Create Trust in Hastily Formed Interorganizational Teams," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
    7. Bill McEvily, 2011. "Reorganizing the Boundaries of Trust: From Discrete Alternatives to Hybrid Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1266-1276, October.
    8. Sabbir Hassan Chowdhury & Sanjoy Kumar Roy & Murshedul Arafin & Sifat Siddiquee, 2019. "Green HR Practices and Its Impact on Employee Work Satisfaction – A Case Study on IBBL, Bangladesh," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 3(3), pages 129-138, March.
    9. Nilanjana Dutt & Andrew A. King, 2014. "The Judgment of Garbage: End-of-Pipe Treatment and Waste Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1812-1828, July.
    10. Li, Jizhong & Jiang, Fuming & Shen, Jie, 2016. "Institutional distance and the quality of the headquarters–subsidiary relationship: The moderating role of the institutionalization of headquarters’ practices in subsidiaries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 589-603.
    11. Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Improving Firm Environmental Performance and Reputation: The Role of Employee Green Teams," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 735-749, December.
    12. Olivier Boiral & Pascal Paillé & Nicolas Raineri, 2015. "The nature of employees’ pro-environmental behaviors," Post-Print hal-03795985, HAL.
    13. Bhuyan, Md Nazmul Hasan & Subedi, Meena & Akter, Maimuna, 2022. "CEO-friendly boards and seasoned equity offerings," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    14. Alexander Lascaux, 2015. "Crowding Out Trust in the Informal Monetary Relationships: The Curious Case of the Hawala System," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 87-107, April.
    15. Dayna Simpson & Danny Samson, 2010. "Environmental strategy and low waste operations: exploring complementarities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 104-118, February.
    16. Esther Albelda Pérez & Carmen Correa Ruiz & Francisco Carrasco Fenech, 2007. "Environmental management systems as an embedding mechanism: a research note," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 403-422, June.
    17. Williams, Michele, 2003. "Interpersonal Action Across Organizational Boundaries: Threat and Trust in the Context of Social Network Diversity," Working papers 4292-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Cruz, Jose M., 2008. "Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1005-1031, February.
    19. Chang Ok, Jin & Sang-Bum Park, 2018. "A Study on Factors Affecting Intention of Choosing Internet Banking and Intention of Continuity," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(12), pages 1-54, December.
    20. Weiping Jiang & Shanqing Tang, 2023. "The Cooperation Establishment Mechanism of EPC Project Consortium in Context of China: Form the Perspective of Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:25:y:2008:i:2:p:249-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.