IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i2p267-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust, institutional quality, and the protection of property rights: A cross‐regional study of East Asia and Western countries

Author

Listed:
  • Kee Hoon Chung
  • Hyeok Yong Kwon

Abstract

Objective This article explores the conditions under which social trust enhances institutional performance, specifically the protection of property rights in Western versus East Asian countries over time. Methods We estimate fixed‐effects panel regression models to test how the relationship between trust and property rights protection is moderated by the quality of political institutions, including state capacity, the legal system, and democracy. Results We find that the relationship between social trust and property rights protection is contingent on the quality of political institutions across regions. The quality of the legal system exerts the most pronounced and contrasting effect on the link between social trust and property rights protection in Western and East Asian countries, while the conditional effects of state capacity and democracy are comparatively less pronounced in both regions. Conclusion This study contributes valuable insights into the complex interplay between social trust and institutional outcomes in diverse societal contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Kee Hoon Chung & Hyeok Yong Kwon, 2024. "Trust, institutional quality, and the protection of property rights: A cross‐regional study of East Asia and Western countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(2), pages 267-280, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:267-280
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13340
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:2:p:267-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.