IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v26y2009i6p783-800.html

Policy Changes on Canada's Rivers: Different but not Isolated

Author

Listed:
  • William R. Lowry

Abstract

I address two questions in this article. First, how do policy changes in Canada differ from those in the United States? Second, are such changes isolated from American influence? I argue that Canadian policy changes will be more driven by subnational bureaucrats, more dependent upon fortuitous alignments of interests and institutions, and less quickly emulated by other jurisdictions than policy changes in the United States. I will also argue that policy changes in Canada are not completely isolated from those in the United States, not given the ability of ideas to cross international borders to change the framing of issues. I examine these arguments in the context of changing river management policies in British Columbia and Ontario.

Suggested Citation

  • William R. Lowry, 2009. "Policy Changes on Canada's Rivers: Different but not Isolated," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(6), pages 783-800, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:6:p:783-800
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00416.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00416.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00416.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoberg, George, 1991. "Sleeping with an Elephant: The American Influence on Canadian Environmental Regulation," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 107-131, January.
    2. Howlett, Michael, 2000. "Beyond Legalism? Policy Ideas, Implementation Styles and Emulation-Based Convergence in Canadian and U.S. Environmental Policy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 305-329, December.
    3. Parsons, Craig, 2002. "Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(1), pages 47-84, January.
    4. Sandford Borins, 2000. "What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(1), pages 46-74.
    5. Craig Volden, 2006. "States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 294-312, April.
    6. Barbara Wake Carroll & Ruth J. E. Jones, 2000. "The Road to Innovation, Convergence or Inertia: Devolution in Housing Policy in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 26(3), pages 277-293, September.
    7. repec:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:03:p:880-899_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Terry Fenge & L. Graham Smith, 1986. "Reforming the Federal Environmental Assessment and Review Process," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 12(4), pages 596-605, December.
    9. David Cameron & Richard Simeon, 2002. "Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: The Emergence of Collaborative Federalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 49-72, Spring.
    10. repec:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:03:p:880-899_25 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Geoffrey E. Hale, 1998. "Reforming Employment Insurance: Transcending the Politics of the Status Quo," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(4), pages 429-451, December.
    12. Lieberman, Robert C., 2002. "Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(4), pages 697-712, December.
    13. Schulman, Paul R., 1975. "Nonincremental Policy Making: Notes Toward an Alternative Paradigm," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(4), pages 1354-1370, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Béland & John Myles, 2008. "Policy Change in the Canadian Welfare State: Comparing the Canada Pension Plan and Unemployment Insurance," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 235, McMaster University.
    2. Roberto Leone & Barbara W Carroll, 2010. "Decentralisation and Devolution in Canadian Social Housing Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(3), pages 389-404, June.
    3. Kern, Kristine & Kissling-Näf, Ingrid, 2002. "Politikkonvergenz und Politikdiffusion durch Regierungs- und Nichtregierungsorganisationen: Ein internationaler Vergleich von Umweltzeichen," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 02-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Simon Fink, 2013. "Policy Convergence with or without the European Union: The Interaction of Policy Success, EU Membership and Policy Convergence," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(4), pages 631-648, July.
    5. Min Xiong & Shaoming Cheng & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2025. "Policy Imitation Based on Similarities: The Diffusion of Public–Private Partnerships," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(2), pages 130-145, May.
    6. Léger Félix Ntienjom Mbohou, 2023. "Understanding the role of institutions in the multiple streams approach through the recognition of the diaspora as a development agent in Cameroon," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 355-376, June.
    7. Amy Y. Li, 2017. "Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(7), pages 746-771, November.
    8. Bernhard Ebbinghaus, 2009. "Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform," Chapters, in: Lars Magnusson & Jan Ottosson (ed.), The Evolution of Path Dependence, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Lucia Quaglia & Amy Verdun, 2025. "The European Central Bank: From a Price Stability Paradigm to a Multidimensional Stability Paradigm," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    10. Shawn Donnelly, 2023. "Clocks, Caps, Compartments, and Carve‐Outs: Creating Federal Fiscal Capacity Despite Strong Veto Powers," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 92-101.
    11. Valente, Thomas W. & Pitts, Stephanie & Wipfli, Heather & Vega Yon, George G., 2019. "Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 188-197.
    12. Melanie Rock & Gwendolyn Blue, 2020. "Healthy publics as multi-species matters: solidarity with people’s pets in One Health promotion," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Hu, Chenguang & Li, Jiatao & Yun, Kyung Hwan, 2023. "Re-examining foreign subsidiary survival in a transition economy: Impact of market identity overlap and conflict," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
    14. Srinivas C. Parinandi, 2020. "Policy Inventing and Borrowing among State Legislatures," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 852-868, October.
    15. Chun-Fang Chiang & Jason M. Kuo & Megumi Naoi & Jin-Tan Liu, 2020. "What Do Voters Learn from Foreign News? Emulation, Backlash, and Public Support for Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 27497, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2017. "Political economy of trade protection and liberalization: in search of agency-based and holistic framework of policy change," MPRA Paper 79504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Eichengreen, Barry, 2002. "Lessons of the Euro for the Rest of the World," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt16g425jb, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    18. Felix Strebel & Thomas Widmer, 2012. "Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 385-398, December.
    19. Marjan Marjanović & Johanna Lilius, 2026. "WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO ‘ACCEPT’ URBAN SHRINKAGE? A Comparative Analysis of Discursive Pathways to Policy and Action on Shrinking Cities in the Netherlands and Finland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 731-752, May.
    20. Kathryn Harrison, 1995. "Is cooperation the answer? Canadian environmental enforcement in comparative context," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(2), pages 221-244.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:6:p:783-800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.