IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v204y2025ics0301421525001703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Ju-Ying

Abstract

Energy transitions do not follow a single pathway as commonly assumed. This paper incorporates path dependence and policy learning literature to unpack different energy transition pathways. This paper examines why municipalities transition to renewable energy differently and identifies contributing factors. Through a comparative case study of four Texas municipalities—Georgetown, Denton, Austin, and Houston—two distinct pathways emerge. The first, a Single Pathway with Feedback Loop, shows that while municipalities can transition smoothly through critical junctures or shocks, they often struggle to maintain their commitments due to poor contract risk management. The second, a Double Pathway with Policy Learning and Infrastructural Lock-in, involves municipalities learning from others’ experiences to avoid mistakes, yet they may still face challenges due to reliance on existing fossil fuel infrastructure. This paper presents an updated theoretical energy transitions framework, highlighting the varied themes of these pathways. The conclusion draws attention to the practical implications for municipalities, particularly in terms of policy learning from past failures and avoiding carbon lock-in during energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Ju-Ying, 2025. "Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001703
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001703
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:204:y:2025:i:c:s0301421525001703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.