IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v69y2023i4p1114-1135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When income differences hurt or excite: The nonlinear effect of regional inequality on subjective wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Becchetti
  • Francesco Colcerasa
  • Fabio Pisani

Abstract

Combining information from the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions and the European Social Survey, we investigate the relationship between subjective well‐being and income inequality using regional inequality indicators and individual data. We assume that inequality aversion and perception of social mobility affect the impact of regional inequality on subjective well‐being in opposite directions. We find evidence of an inverse U‐shaped effect of inequality, where inequality starts to have a positive effect on subjective well‐being that becomes negative with a switch point before the average of the Gini index for the entire sample. The rationale for our nonlinear finding is that Hirschman's tunnel effect (and the positive effect of perceived social mobility) prevails for low levels of inequality, while inequality aversion and negative relative income effects are relatively stronger when inequality is higher. Robustness checks on different sample splits are consistent with the hypothesis of the two drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Becchetti & Francesco Colcerasa & Fabio Pisani, 2023. "When income differences hurt or excite: The nonlinear effect of regional inequality on subjective wellbeing," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(4), pages 1114-1135, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:69:y:2023:i:4:p:1114-1135
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12608
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.12608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:69:y:2023:i:4:p:1114-1135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.