IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v61y2024i4p1717-1730.html

Panacea or Dangerous Practice: A Counterpoint to Hanisch's Argument for Prescriptive Theorizing

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Horner
  • Joep Cornelissen
  • Mike Zundel

Abstract

In this paper we provide a counterpoint to the view that prescriptive theorizing reflects a viable means for enhancing the practical impact of management theorizing towards addressing some of the most pressing societal concerns and grand challenges of our times. To do so, we first contextualize the roots of prescriptive theorizing in management research, arguing that the approach developed by Hanisch is reflective of the wider ‘positive’ prescriptive turn in social science theorizing. Second, we problematize the presumptive basis upon which much prescriptive theorizing as well as related ideas around utopian thinking are based. In doing so, our broader aim is to draw attention to the bases upon which prescriptive claims are made and we specifically highlight the dangers of implementing decontextualized, overly simple and stylized prescriptions in the face of complex grand challenges. In contrast to prescriptive theorizing, we propose that the practical impact of management theory may rather be enhanced through a tempering of instrumental rationality with a deep(er) concern for phenomena and experience. We conclude the paper by offering a number of ways in which this can be done.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Horner & Joep Cornelissen & Mike Zundel, 2024. "Panacea or Dangerous Practice: A Counterpoint to Hanisch's Argument for Prescriptive Theorizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1717-1730, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:1717-1730
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13039
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donaldson, Thomas, 1994. "When Integration Fails: The Logic of Prescription and Description in Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 157-169, April.
    2. H. Igor Ansoff, 1979. "Strategic Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-02971-6, March.
    3. Marvin Hanisch, 2024. "Prescriptive Theorizing in Management Research: A New Impetus for Addressing Grand Challenges," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1692-1716, June.
    4. John Antonakis & Samuel Bendahan & Philippe Jacquart & Rafael Lalive, 2010. "On making causal claims : A review and recommendations," Post-Print hal-02313119, HAL.
    5. von Hayek, Friedrich August, 1989. "The Pretence of Knowledge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(6), pages 3-7, December.
    6. Guido W. Imbens, 2022. "Causality in Econometrics: Choice vs Chance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2541-2566, November.
    7. Ali Aslan Gümüsay & Juliane Reinecke, 2022. "Researching for Desirable Futures: From Real Utopias to Imagining Alternatives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 236-242, January.
    8. Richard Makadok & Richard Burton & Jay Barney, 2018. "A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1530-1545, June.
    9. Friedman, Milton, 1966. "Essays in Positive Economics," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226264035, August.
    10. Joep Cornelissen & Mariëtte Kaandorp, 2023. "Towards Stronger Causal Claims in Management Research: Causal Triangulation Instead of Causal Identification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 834-860, June.
    11. Camerer, Colin & Dreber, Anna & Forsell, Eskil & Ho, Teck-Hua & Huber, Jurgen & Johannesson, Magnus & Kirchler, Michael & Almenberg, Johan & Altmejd, Adam & Chan, Taizan & Heikensten, Emma & Holzmeist, 2016. "Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in Economics," MPRA Paper 75461, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sophie Bacq & Frank Janssen & Anne-Sophie Sabbatucci & Amélie Wuillaume, 2026. "The dark side of doing good: a guiding framework for advancing research on the negative outcomes of social entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 647-674, February.
    2. Alex Wright, 2025. "Back to the Future? A Caution," Post-Print hal-05008435, HAL.
    3. Christoph Seckler & René Mauer & Jan vom Brocke & Marvin Hanisch & Stephanie Schrage & Orestis Terzidis & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2025. "Design Science Across Disciplines: Building Bridges for Advancing Impactful Business Research," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 719-761, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Wright, 2025. "Back to the Future? A Caution," Post-Print hal-05008435, HAL.
    2. Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich & Markus P. Zimmer & Stefanie Habersang & Leonhard Dobusch & Maren Gierlich-Joas & Elke Schüßler & Benjamin Mueller & Cristina Mihale-Wilson & Julia Zeller-Lanzl & Stephan Bohn , 2025. "Digital Responsibility: Building Bridges Between Organization Theory and Information Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 597-642, December.
    3. Mark D. Packard & Per L. Bylund, 2025. "Truth, knowledge, and entrepreneurship theory: arguments for a rationalist scientific epistemology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-405, June.
    4. Brinkerink, Jasper & De Massis, Alfredo & Kellermanns, Franz, 2022. "One finding is no finding: Toward a replication culture in family business research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    5. Sophie Bacq & Frank Janssen & Anne-Sophie Sabbatucci & Amélie Wuillaume, 2026. "The dark side of doing good: a guiding framework for advancing research on the negative outcomes of social entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 647-674, February.
    6. Joep Cornelissen & Mariëtte Kaandorp, 2023. "Towards Stronger Causal Claims in Management Research: Causal Triangulation Instead of Causal Identification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 834-860, June.
    7. Anderson, Brian S. & Wennberg, Karl & McMullen, Jeffery S., 2019. "Editorial: Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1-1.
    8. Wennberg, Karl & Anderson, Brian S. & McMullen, Jeffrey, 2019. "2 Editorial: Enhancing Quantitative Theory-Testing Entrepreneurship Research," Ratio Working Papers 323, The Ratio Institute.
    9. Christoph Seckler & René Mauer & Jan vom Brocke & Marvin Hanisch & Stephanie Schrage & Orestis Terzidis & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2025. "Design Science Across Disciplines: Building Bridges for Advancing Impactful Business Research," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 719-761, December.
    10. Joep Cornelissen & Victoria Stephens & Lee Matthews, 2024. "Unlocking the power of diversity for supply chain knowledge: Is pluralism in theorizing styles the key?," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(3), pages 3-17, July.
    11. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    12. Christopher Wickert, 2024. "Prescriptive Theorizing to Tackle Societal Grand Challenges: Promises and Perils," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1683-1691, June.
    13. Herman Aguinis & Ravi S Ramani & Wayne F Cascio, 2020. "Methodological practices in international business research: An after-action review of challenges and solutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1593-1608, December.
    14. Mueller-Langer, Frank & Fecher, Benedikt & Harhoff, Dietmar & Wagner, Gert G., 2019. "Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 62-83.
    15. Asanov, Anastasiya-Mariya & Asanov, Igor & Buenstorf, Guido, 2024. "A low-cost digital first aid tool to reduce psychological distress in refugees: A multi-country randomized controlled trial of self-help online in the first months after the invasion of Ukraine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    16. Piotr Daniluk, 2021. "Strategic Analysis of Energy Security. Methodological Aspects of the Scenario Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Alona Goloborodko, 2022. "Theoretical and Methodological Principles of Managing the Enterprise's Integrative Development," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 139-146, December.
    18. Krishnan Nair & Waqas Haque & Steve Sauerwald, 2022. "It’s Not What You Say, But How You Sound: CEO Vocal Masculinity and the Board's Early‐Stage CEO Compensation Decisions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1227-1252, July.
    19. Shvartsman, Elena & Beckmann, Michael, 2015. "Stressed by your job: What is the role of personnel policy?," Working papers 2015/15, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    20. Chavez, Daniel E. & Palma, Marco A. & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Mjelde, James W., 2020. "Product availability in discrete choice experiments with private goods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:61:y:2024:i:4:p:1717-1730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.