IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v54y2020i3p854-889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What retailers need to understand about website inaccessibility and disabled consumers: Challenges and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Alex H. Cohen
  • Jorge E. Fresneda
  • Rolph E. Anderson

Abstract

This research uniquely contributes to the marketing policy literature by illuminating the widespread yet seldom studied problem of online inaccessibility of retail websites affecting approximately 30 million disabled Americans. When a website is not designed to be navigated easily or is not compatible with assistive technology such as a screen‐reader, these potential customers are not able to independently search for information and conduct transactions. Blind and low vision participants in an empirical study provide their opinions regarding accessibility policy issues and reveal that their frustrations with inaccessible retail websites may result, not only in avoidance of the retailer in its different sales channels but also in antifirm behaviors driven by negative attitudes toward perceived retailer accessibility/disability policy that spur feelings of online marketplace discrimination. Using two different evaluation tools, the top 100 retailers in the United States were evaluated on the accessibility of their websites over the past 4 years (2015–2018). Results show that most websites contain many design errors making navigation very difficult or even impossible for vision impaired consumers. The argument is made that online retailers who proactively address these inaccessibility issues on their websites may significantly increase their customer base and profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex H. Cohen & Jorge E. Fresneda & Rolph E. Anderson, 2020. "What retailers need to understand about website inaccessibility and disabled consumers: Challenges and opportunities," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 854-889, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:54:y:2020:i:3:p:854-889
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bougie, J.R.G. & Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M., 2003. "Angry customers don't come back, they get back : The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services," Other publications TiSEM 1708fb71-fd68-41d9-b870-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Baker, Thomas L. & Meyer, Tracy, 2012. "Moderating effect of discriminatory attributions on repatronage intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 211-217.
    3. Childers, Terry L. & Kaufman-Scarborough, Carol, 2009. "Expanding opportunities for online shoppers with disabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 572-578, May.
    4. Carolyn Bonifield & Catherine Cole, 2007. "Affective responses to service failure: Anger, regret, and retaliatory versus conciliatory responses," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 85-99, June.
    5. Klinner, Nicole S. & Walsh, Gianfranco, 2013. "Customer perceptions of discrimination in service deliveries: Construction and validation of a measurement instrument," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 651-658.
    6. Ramiro Gonçalves & José Martins & Jorge Pereira & Manuel Oliveira & João Ferreira, 2013. "Enterprise Web Accessibility Levels Amongst the Forbes 250: Where Art Thou O Virtuous Leader?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 363-375, March.
    7. Folkes, Valerie S, 1988. "Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(4), pages 548-565, March.
    8. Adam Duhachek, 2005. "Coping: A Multidimensional, Hierarchical Framework of Responses to Stressful Consumption Episodes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 41-53, June.
    9. George Balabanis & Vincent Wayne Mitchell & Ian Bruce & Petra Riefler, 2012. "A Conceptual Stress-Coping Model of Factors Influencing Marketplace Engagement of Visually Impaired Consumers," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 485-505, September.
    10. Weiner, Bernard, 2000. "Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 382-387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Romani, Simona & Grappi, Silvia & Dalli, Daniele, 2012. "Emotions that drive consumers away from brands: Measuring negative emotions toward brands and their behavioral effects," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 55-67.
    2. Arora, Swapan Deep & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2021. "Intellectual structure of consumer complaining behavior (CCB) research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 60-74.
    3. Wiegerinck, V.J.J., 2006. "Consumer trust and food safety. : An attributional approach to food safety incidents and channel response," Other publications TiSEM 6853c430-a9ce-434f-8d45-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Ana B. Casado & Juan Luis Nicolau & Francisco Mas Ruiz, 2008. "The negative effects of failed service recoveries," Working Papers. Serie EC 2008-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    5. Ramakrishna Salagrama & Sanjeev Prashar & T. Sai Vijay, 2021. "Do customers exhibit gratitude after service recovery? Understanding the moderating role of relationship type," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(4), pages 757-779, December.
    6. Tuzovic, Sven & Simpson, Merlin C. & Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Finsterwalder, Jörg, 2014. "From ‘free’ to fee: Acceptability of airline ancillary fees and the effects on customer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 98-107.
    7. Kalamas, Maria & Laroche, Michel & Makdessian, Lucy, 2008. "Reaching the boiling point: Consumers' negative affective reactions to firm-attributed service failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 813-824, August.
    8. Jessica Mikeska & Elise Johansen Harvey, 2015. "The Political CEO: An Event Study Comparing Consumer Attributions of CEO Behavior," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(1), pages 76-92, March.
    9. Anne-Madeleine Kranzbühler & Mirella H. P. Kleijnen & Peeter W. J. Verlegh, 2019. "Outsourcing the pain, keeping the pleasure: effects of outsourced touchpoints in the customer journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 308-327, March.
    10. Nika Meyer (née Mozafari) & Melanie Schwede & Maik Hammerschmidt & Welf Hermann Weiger, 2022. "Users taking the blame? How service failure, recovery, and robot design affect user attributions and retention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2491-2505, December.
    11. Fombelle, Paul W. & Voorhees, Clay M. & Jenkins, Mason R. & Sidaoui, Karim & Benoit, Sabine & Gruber, Thorsten & Gustafsson, Anders & Abosag, Ibrahim, 2020. "Customer deviance: A framework, prevention strategies, and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 387-400.
    12. Chen, Ke & Chen, Jianxun & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush, 2020. "When in Rome! Complaint contagion effect in multi-actor service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 628-641.
    13. Paydas Turan, Ceyda, 2022. "Deal or deny: The effectiveness of crisis response strategies on brand equity of the focal brand in co-branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 615-629.
    14. Gao, Hongzhi & Knight, John G. & Zhang, Hongxia & Mather, Damien, 2013. "Guilt by association: Heuristic risks for foreign brands during a product-harm crisis in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1044-1051.
    15. Li, Yi & Fumagalli, Elena, 2022. "Spoiled Rotten: How and When Discontinuation of Repetitive and Regular Delight Offers Increases Customer Desire for Revenge," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 412-431.
    16. Demoulin, Nathalie & Willems, Kim, 2019. "Servicescape irritants and customer satisfaction: The moderating role of shopping motives and involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 295-306.
    17. Ana B. Casado & Francisco J. Mas & Hans Kasper, 2006. "Explaining Satisfaction In Double Deviation Scenarios: The Effects Of Anger And Distributive Justice," Working Papers. Serie EC 2006-09, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    18. Alba, George & Slongo, Luiz Antonio, 2020. "Getting a no-reply is also a reply: An investigation of unreplied consumer attributions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    19. Gergely Nyilasy & Harsha Gangadharbatla & Angela Paladino, 2014. "Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 693-707, December.
    20. Simone T. Peinkofer & Yao Henry Jin, 2023. "The impact of order fulfillment information disclosure on consequences of deceptive counterfeits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 237-260, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:54:y:2020:i:3:p:854-889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.