IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v53y2026i1p107-130.html

Strategic Alignment Between Supply Chain Partners and Supplier Audit Fees

Author

Listed:
  • Hsihui Chang
  • Rong‐Ruey Duh
  • W. Robert Knechel
  • Sheng Liu

Abstract

This study examines whether strategic alignment between participants in the same supply chain is associated with supplier audit fees. We hypothesize that strategic alignment between suppliers and customers can mitigate the business and audit risk associated with auditing a supplier firm, which will be associated with lower audit fees. We utilize disclosures about major customers to construct a dataset of supplier–customer dyads and then compare the relative strategies of the two parties. The empirical results support our hypothesis that strategic alignment between suppliers and their major customers is associated with lower audit fees for the supplier. We also find that the negative association between strategic alignment and supplier audit fees is more pronounced when auditors are industry specialists. Our results remain robust when using alternative measures of strategic alignment, testing for functional form misspecification, and addressing potential endogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsihui Chang & Rong‐Ruey Duh & W. Robert Knechel & Sheng Liu, 2026. "Strategic Alignment Between Supply Chain Partners and Supplier Audit Fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 107-130, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:107-130
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.70011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:107-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.