IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i2p1432-1454.html

Economic Freedom and Audit Fees: Evidence From the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmud Hossain
  • Ahsan Habib
  • Dinithi Ranasinghe
  • Marlissa Phillips

Abstract

We examine the association between US state‐level economic freedom and audit fees. We argue that economic freedom lowers clients' perceived business risk, thereby requiring reduced audit effort and exposing auditors to a lower probability of litigation risk, which enables auditors to charge lower audit fees to clients headquartered in states with high economic freedom. Using a US sample, we find a negative association between economic freedom and audit fees. Our study contributes to the emerging literature on socio‐economic determinants of audit fees by providing evidence that economic freedom reduces overall inherent risk, thereby reducing audit risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmud Hossain & Ahsan Habib & Dinithi Ranasinghe & Marlissa Phillips, 2026. "Economic Freedom and Audit Fees: Evidence From the USA," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 1432-1454, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1432-1454
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.70187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy B. Bell & Wayne R. Landsman & Douglas A. Shackelford, 2001. "Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 35-43, June.
    2. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    3. Gropper, Daniel M. & Jahera, John S. & Park, Jung Chul, 2015. "Political power, economic freedom and Congress: Effects on bank performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 76-92.
    4. Leuz, Christian & Nanda, Dhananjay & Wysocki, Peter D., 2003. "Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 505-527, September.
    5. Li, Xuelian & Liu, Ming, 2024. "Abnormal audit fees and financial reporting quality: A meta-analysis," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    6. Zhu, Baoying & Yang, Mingyan & Chu, Xu, 2024. "Good governance and innovation: Economic freedom matters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Scott N. Bronson & Aloke (Al) Ghosh & Chris E. Hogan, 2017. "Audit Fee Differential, Audit Effort, and Litigation Risk: An Examination of ADR Firms," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 83-117, March.
    8. Hou, Tony Chieh-Tse & Gao, Simon, 2021. "The impact of economic freedom on financial analysts' earnings forecast: Evidence from the Asia-Pacific region," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    9. Barua, Abhijit & Lennox, Clive & Raghunandan, Aneesh, 2020. "Are audit fees discounted in initial year audit engagements?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    10. Jeremy J. Jackson, 2017. "Economic freedom and social capital: pooled mean group evidence," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 370-373, March.
    11. Simunic, Da, 1980. "The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 161-190.
    12. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    13. Hongkang Xu & Mai Dao & Alex Petkevich, 2019. "Political Corruption and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from US Firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 513-540, May.
    14. Kenneth J. Reichelt & Dechun Wang, 2010. "National and Office‐Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 48(3), pages 647-686, June.
    15. Roychowdhury, Sugata, 2006. "Earnings management through real activities manipulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 335-370, December.
    16. James B. Bailey & Diana W. Thomas, 2017. "Regulating away competition: the effect of regulation on entrepreneurship and employment," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 237-254, December.
    17. Lawrence J. Abbott & Katherine Gunny & Troy Pollard, 2017. "The Impact of Litigation Risk on Auditor Pricing Behavior: Evidence From Reverse Mergers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 1103-1127, June.
    18. Gwartney, James & Lawson, Robert, 2003. "The concept and measurement of economic freedom," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 405-430, September.
    19. R.W. Hafer, 2013. "Economic Freedom and Financial Development: International Evidence," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 33(1), pages 111-126, Winter.
    20. Zhengrong Yang & Prince Asare Vitenu-Sackey & Lizhong Hao & Yuqi Tao, 2023. "Economic freedom, inclusive growth, and financial development: A heterogeneous panel analysis of developing countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, July.
    21. Bjørnskov, Christian, 2016. "Economic freedom and economic crises," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 45(S), pages 11-23.
    22. Ferdinand A. Gul & Anthony C. Ng, 2018. "Auditee Religiosity, External Monitoring, and the Pricing of Audit Services," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 409-436, October.
    23. Laux, Volker & Stocken, Phillip C., 2012. "Managerial reporting, overoptimism, and litigation risk," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 577-591.
    24. Seetharaman, Ananth & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Lynn, Stephen G., 2002. "Litigation risk and audit fees: evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 91-115, February.
    25. John D. Lyon & Michael W. Maher, 2005. "The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 133-151, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Balasingham Balachandran & Huu Nhan Duong & Premkanth Puwanenthiren & Michael Theobald, 2025. "Does options trading affect audit pricing?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 609-651, February.
    2. Chang, Hsihui & Ho, L.C. Jennifer & Liu, Zenghui & Ouyang, Bo, 2021. "Income smoothing and audit fees," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Hao, Jie & Pham, Viet Tuan, 2024. "Stuck in traffic: Do auditors price traffic congestion?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    4. Ting‐Chiao Huang & Yi‐Hung Lin & Daniel Chai & Stephanie Hairston, 2025. "Are auditors insulated to positive client news? Evidence from audit fees and going‐concern opinions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(3), pages 2339-2386, September.
    5. Costa, Mabel D. & Habib, Ahsan, 2023. "Local creative culture and audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    6. Bryan, David B. & Mason, Terry W., 2016. "Extreme CEO pay cuts and audit fees," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Hsihui Chang & Rong‐Ruey Duh & W. Robert Knechel & Sheng Liu, 2026. "Strategic Alignment Between Supply Chain Partners and Supplier Audit Fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 107-130, February.
    8. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    9. Smith, Deborah Drummond & Gleason, Kimberly C. & Kannan, Yezen H., 2021. "Auditor liability and excess cash holdings: Evidence from audit fees of foreign incorporated firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Liwei Shan & Albert Tsang & Xiaoxue Zhang, 2024. "Transporting Audit Quality Across Countries: Returnee CEOs and Audit Fees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(4), pages 845-874, July.
    11. Nerissa C. Brown & Jennifer R. Joe & Kecia Williams Smith & Henry Wang, 2025. "Auditors’ Response to Client Corruption: Evidence From Google Document Frequency," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 2299-2334, November.
    12. Wen, Fenghua & Chen, Meng & Zhang, Yun & Miao, Xiao, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty and audit fees: Evidence from the energy industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Ahsan Habib & Mostafa Monzur Hasan & Ahmed Al-Hadi, 2018. "Money laundering and audit fees," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 427-459, June.
    14. Dang, Man & Puwanenthiren, Premkanth & Truong, Cameron & Henry, Darren & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Audit quality and seasoned equity offerings methods," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    15. Gu, Junjian, 2021. "FDI characteristics, industry homogeneity, and audit fees in Japanese multinationals," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Paul Hribar & Todd Kravet & Ryan Wilson, 2014. "A new measure of accounting quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 506-538, March.
    17. Xiting Wu & Le Luo & Jiaxing You, 2025. "Actions speak louder than words: environmental law enforcement and audit fees," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 519-574, March.
    18. Chen, Xiao & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Liu, Leo Jiahe, 2025. "Audit implications of major customer diversity," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    19. Tobias Witter & Thorsten Sellhorn & Jens Müller & Vicky Kiosse, 2022. "Balance sheet smoothing," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0006, Berlin School of Economics.
    20. Bilokha, Alona & Kong, Joon Ho & Micale, Joseph A., 2024. "Universal demand laws and stakeholders: Evidence from the auditor's perspective," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1432-1454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.