IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i6p1883-1899.html

Carbon disclosures and information asymmetry: Empirical evidence on the importance of text in understanding numerical emission allowance disclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Steindl
  • Florian Habermann
  • Stephan Küster

Abstract

Carbon disclosures are essential for investors to evaluate firms’ efforts to combat climate change. In this study, we focus on a specific type of carbon disclosures—namely, emission allowance disclosures—that capture how firms implement emission reductions under the European Union emission trading system (EU ETS). Given the continuously changing institutional features of the EU ETS and the lack of authoritative guidance on how firms should account for emission allowances in their financial statements, it is exceedingly difficult for investors to understand numerical emission allowance disclosures and to compare them across—and even within—firms. Motivated by this criticism, we hypothesize and find that textual disclosures complementing numerical emission allowance disclosures are associated with lower information asymmetries between firms and their investors. Further analyses show that textual disclosures that: (i) describe the accounting approach, and (ii) contain institutional information on the EU ETS, respectively, are particularly important for improving the information environment of numerical emission allowance disclosures. Overall, our findings suggest that text can improve the understanding of numbers in a carbon disclosure context. Therefore, our study not only contributes to the (industrial ecology) literature but also has important implications for regulators, policymakers, investors, financial analysts, and firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Steindl & Florian Habermann & Stephan Küster, 2024. "Carbon disclosures and information asymmetry: Empirical evidence on the importance of text in understanding numerical emission allowance disclosures," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(6), pages 1883-1899, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1883-1899
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13574
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Abrell & Johanna Cludius & Sascha Lehmann & Joachim Schleich & Regina Betz, 2022. "Corporate Emissions-Trading Behaviour During the First Decade of the EU ETS," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(1), pages 47-83, September.
    2. Celeste M. Black, 2013. "Accounting for Carbon Emission Allowances in the European Union: In Search of Consistency," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 223-239, November.
    3. Lena Klaaßen & Christian Stoll, 2021. "Harmonizing corporate carbon footprints," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Yonca Ertimur & Jennifer Francis & Amanda Gonzales & Katherine Schipper, 2020. "Financial Reporting for Pollution Reduction Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 6015-6041, December.
    5. Junming Zhu & Zhangming Ge & Jiali Wang & Xiao Li & Can Wang, 2022. "Evaluating regional carbon emissions trading in China: effects, pathways, co-benefits, spillovers, and prospects," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 918-934, August.
    6. David Christopher Sprengel & Timo Busch, 2011. "Stakeholder engagement and environmental strategy – the case of climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 351-364, September.
    7. Florence Depoers & Thomas Jeanjean & Tiphaine Jérôme, 2016. "Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Contrasting the Carbon Disclosure Project and Corporate Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 445-461, March.
    8. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    9. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    10. Stephan Fuhrmann & Christian Ott & Elisabeth Looks & Thomas W. Guenther, 2017. "The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 369-400, June.
    11. Diamond, Douglas W & Verrecchia, Robert E, 1991. "Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(4), pages 1325-1359, September.
    12. Aleksandar Zaklan & Jakob Wachsmuth & Vicki Duscha, 2021. "The EU ETS to 2030 and beyond: adjusting the cap in light of the 1.5°C target and current energy policies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 778-791, July.
    13. Zahra Borghei & Philomena Leung & James Guthrie, 2018. "Does voluntary greenhouse gas emissions disclosure reduce information asymmetry? Australian evidence," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 123-147.
    14. Emily Oster, 2019. "Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 187-204, April.
    15. Diego R. Känzig, 2023. "The Unequal Economic Consequences of Carbon Pricing," NBER Working Papers 31221, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Junming Zhu, 2020. "Suggested use? On evidence‐based decision‐making in industrial ecology and beyond," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 943-950, October.
    17. Paul A. Griffin & David H. Lont & Estelle Y. Sun, 2017. "The Relevance to Investors of Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosures," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 1265-1297, June.
    18. Laura Schons & Maria Steinmeier, 2016. "Walk the Talk? How Symbolic and Substantive CSR Actions Affect Firm Performance Depending on Stakeholder Proximity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 358-372, November.
    19. Frank Schiemann & Alice Sakhel, 2019. "Carbon Disclosure, Contextual Factors, and Information Asymmetry: The Case of Physical Risk Reporting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 791-818, August.
    20. Simone Lazzini & Zeila Occhipinti & Angela Parenti & Roberto Verona, 2021. "Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2332-2353, July.
    21. Leuz, C & Verrecchia, RE, 2000. "The economic consequences of increased disclosure," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38, pages 91-124.
    22. Peter M. Clarkson & Yue Li & Matthew Pinnuck & Gordon D. Richardson, 2015. "The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 551-580, September.
    23. Glosten, Lawrence R. & Milgrom, Paul R., 1985. "Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 71-100, March.
    24. Timo Busch & Matthew Johnson & Thomas Pioch, 2022. "Corporate carbon performance data: Quo vadis?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 350-363, February.
    25. My Hanh Doan & Remmer Sassen, 2020. "The relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A meta‐analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1140-1157, October.
    26. Karl A. Muller, III & Edward J. Riedl & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2011. "Mandatory Fair Value Accounting and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the European Real Estate Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1138-1153, June.
    27. Lang, Mark & Stice-Lawrence, Lorien, 2015. "Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 110-135.
    28. David Bendig & Andreas Wagner & Kevin Lau, 2023. "Does it pay to be science‐based green? The impact of science‐based emission‐reduction targets on corporate financial performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 125-140, February.
    29. Zahra Borghei, 2021. "Carbon disclosure: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5255-5280, December.
    30. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    31. Verrecchia, Robert E., 2001. "Essays on disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 97-180, December.
    32. Shuili Du & Kun Yu, 2021. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Convey Value Relevant Information? Evidence from Report Readability and Tone," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 253-274, August.
    33. Jones, Jj, 1991. "Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 193-228.
    34. Tae Hee Kim & Sun Hye Lee & Petros Vourvachis, 2023. "Accounting Standard-Setting for an Emission Trading Scheme: The Korean Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 1003-1024, February.
    35. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Nachtigall, Daniel & Venmans, Frank, 2023. "The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    36. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    37. Li, Feng, 2008. "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 221-247, August.
    38. Kuo Zhou & Xianghui Jin & Xinru Li & Yunqing Tao, 2024. "Enhancing sustainable development through effective disclosure: Corporate environmental performance and readability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 274-291, January.
    39. Anastasia Axjonow & Jürgen Ernstberger & Christiane Pott, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Reputation: A Non-professional Stakeholder Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 429-450, August.
    40. Stéphanie Mittelbach-Hörmanseder & Katrin Hummel & Margarethe Rammerstorfer, 2021. "The information content of corporate social responsibility disclosure in Europe: an institutional perspective," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 309-348, March.
    41. Timo Busch & Stefan Lewandowski, 2018. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 745-759, August.
    42. Alan Teixeira, 2014. "The International Accounting Standards Board and Evidence-Informed Standard-Setting," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 5-12, June.
    43. Bego�a Giner, 2014. "Accounting for Emission Trading Schemes: A Still Open Debate," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 45-51, April.
    44. Barth, Mary E. & Cahan, Steven F. & Chen, Li & Venter, Elmar R., 2017. "The Economic Consequences Associated with Integrated Report Quality: Capital Market and Real Effects," Research Papers 3546, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    45. Derek Johnston & Stephan Sefcik & Naomi Soderstrom, 2008. "The Value Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances: An Exploratory Study in the Related United States SO2 Market," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 747-764.
    46. George M. Constantinides, 2005. "Capital Market Equilibrium with Transaction Costs," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 7, pages 207-227, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    47. Katharina Hombach & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2022. "Does every accounting issue need a solution?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 540-561, July.
    48. Volkan Muslu & Sunay Mutlu & Suresh Radhakrishnan & Albert Tsang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility Report Narratives and Analyst Forecast Accuracy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1119-1142, February.
    49. Amy Luers & Leehi Yona & Christopher B. Field & Robert B. Jackson & Katharine J. Mach & Benjamin W. Cashore & Cynthia Elliott & Lauren Gifford & Colleen Honigsberg & Lena Klaassen & H. Damon Matthews , 2022. "Make greenhouse-gas accounting reliable — build interoperable systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 607(7920), pages 653-656, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Kayser & Martin Schüder & Benedikt T. Retsch & Henning Zülch, 2026. "What Role Do Scope 3 Emissions Play in the Carbon Financial Performance Context? Evidence From Disentangling of Scopes 1, 2, and 3 Emission Performance Within the Science‐Based Targets Initiative Setting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1426-1455, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hossain, Amir & Bose, Sudipta & Shamsuddin, Abul, 2025. "Do integrated report readability and tone convey value relevant information? International evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    2. Rina Datt & Le Luo & Reuben Segara, 2025. "Voluntary carbon assurance and the cost of equity capital: International evidence," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(4), pages 1129-1165, November.
    3. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    4. Iatridis, George, 2010. "International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 193-204, June.
    5. Xuefeng Li & Le Luo & Qingliang Tang, 2024. "Climate risk and opportunity exposure and firm value: An international investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5540-5562, September.
    6. Andreas Altendorfer & Brigitte Eierle & Stephan Küster, 2026. "Investor‐ versus Multi‐stakeholder Orientation: The Influence of CSR Framework Adoption on Information Asymmetry," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 62(2), pages 469-507, June.
    7. Rainer Kasperzak & Marko Kureljusic & Lucas Reisch & Simon Thies, 2023. "Accounting for Carbon Emissions—Current State of Sustainability Reporting Practice under the GHG Protocol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Papadopoulos, Georgios, 2026. "The effect of external assurance on corporate carbon disclosures: Empirical evidence from Europe," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Rong He & Le Luo & Abul Shamsuddin & Qingliang Tang, 2022. "Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 261-298, March.
    10. Christian Leuz & Peter D. Wysocki, 2016. "The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation: Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 54(2), pages 525-622, May.
    11. Ajina, Aymen & Habib, Aymen, 2017. "Examining the relationship between earning management and market liquidity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1164-1172.
    12. Federico Galán-Valdivieso & Laura Saraite-Sariene & Juana Alonso-Cañadas & María del Carmen Caba-Pérez, 2019. "Do Corporate Carbon Policies Enhance Legitimacy? A Social Media Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Yonca Ertimur & Jennifer Francis & Amanda Gonzales & Katherine Schipper, 2020. "Financial Reporting for Pollution Reduction Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 6015-6041, December.
    14. Shan Zhou, 2022. "Reporting and Assurance of Climate‐Related and Other Sustainability Information: A Review of Research and Practice," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 315-333, September.
    15. Barg, Johannes A. & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Schröder, Henning, 2024. "Institutional dual ownership and voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Vanessa Behrmann & Lars Hornuf & Daniel Vrankar & Jochen Zimmermann, 2025. "The deregulation of quarterly reporting and its effects on information asymmetry and firm value," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 1221-1259, April.
    17. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Riccardo Macchioni & Annamaria Zampella, 2018. "Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1031-1056, May.
    18. Li, Mingchen & Li, Peigong & Zhu, Wanwan, 2025. "Greenhouse gas performance and disclosure-new global evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Albrecht, Disen Huang & Anantharaman, Divya & Zhao, Keyi, 2025. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? Image usage in ESG reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Madhavan Vishnu Nampoothiri & Oliver Entrop & Thillai Rajan Annamalai, 2024. "Effect of mandatory sustainability performance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from listed European firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5220-5235, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1883-1899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.