IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v22y2022i7p918-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating regional carbon emissions trading in China: effects, pathways, co-benefits, spillovers, and prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Junming Zhu
  • Zhangming Ge
  • Jiali Wang
  • Xiao Li
  • Can Wang

Abstract

Emissions trading systems (ETS) have been a widely-adopted policy instrument for global climate mitigation and a key choice in China’s pledge for peaking emissions and carbon neutrality. Broader adoption and linkage of ETS programmes require a better understanding of whether, to what extent, and how existing regional programmes address carbon emissions at an aggregate level. Combining a synthetic control method and event studies, we adopt a comprehensive evaluation framework to investigate regional mitigation effects, pathways, and ancillary impacts in three Chinese regions with four independent pilot ETS programmes. The findings show economy-wide responses to pilot announcement even in non-ETS sectors, but enduring mitigation only within ETS sectors. Mitigation was achieved via improvement in energy efficiency and fuel switch, without impairing industrial activities. There were local air-pollution reduction co-benefits but no leakage or spillover. Bounded extrapolation from the pilots suggests 18%–20% reductions can be achieved in non-pilot regions by a national market, which could learn from pilots’ experiences to broaden sector coverage and ensure policy consistency and transparency. Regional ETS were able to stabilize emissions with little cost, providing rationale for rapidly developing economies to adopt such systems.Key policy insights Despite being unlinked, regional ETS pilots delivered substantial climate mitigation and local air pollution reduction in China.Policy effects were initially driven by economy-wide mitigation due to policy expectations, followed by ETS-sector mitigation due to carbon pricing.Industries reduced CO2 emissions from energy efficiency improvements and fuel switch.Mitigation was accompanied by little emission leakage or impairment to the economy.Extrapolating mitigation rates in a national market suggests 18%–20% reduction of CO2.

Suggested Citation

  • Junming Zhu & Zhangming Ge & Jiali Wang & Xiao Li & Can Wang, 2022. "Evaluating regional carbon emissions trading in China: effects, pathways, co-benefits, spillovers, and prospects," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 918-934, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:22:y:2022:i:7:p:918-934
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2022.2054765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2022.2054765
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2022.2054765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Qingyang & Tan, Chang & Wang, Daoping & Wu, Yongtao & Meng, Jing & Zheng, Heran, 2023. "How carbon emission prices accelerate net zero: Evidence from China's coal-fired power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Mingxia Shi & Yibo Wang, 2023. "Do Green Transfer Payments Contribute to Carbon Emission Reduction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Jia, Zhijie, 2023. "The hidden benefit: Emission trading scheme and business performance of downstream enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:22:y:2022:i:7:p:918-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.