IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v21y2021i6p778-791.html

The EU ETS to 2030 and beyond: adjusting the cap in light of the 1.5°C target and current energy policies

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandar Zaklan
  • Jakob Wachsmuth
  • Vicki Duscha

Abstract

The Paris Agreement calls on countries to pursue efforts to limit global average temperature rise to 1.5°C. We derive a 2016–2050 emission budget for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) based on cost-effectiveness criteria aimed at achieving the 1.5°C target with a 50%–66% probability, and translate it into a cap reduction path. We show that, under current ETS parameters, the vast majority of this budget will be consumed by 2030. Meeting the budget under current 2030 EU ETS parameters would require drastic – and probably unrealistic – additional efforts after 2030. We derive a cost-effective scenario delivering a smoother and more credible emission pathway. We show that recently increased EU targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency, along with national coal phase-out policies up to 2030 provide cap adjustment potential. If the cap is adjusted to reflect these policies and if phased-out coal capacities are fully substituted through renewable energy, emissions in ETS sectors could decline by 57% through to 2030. This approximates our cost-effective scenario and translates into a linear reduction factor (LRF) for the cap of 3.6% for the period 2021–2030.Key policy insights Paris Agreement-compatible emission budgets can serve as a guideline to define the minimum requirement for emission reductions in the EU ETS.The globally cost-effective emissions budget for EU ETS sectors in line with limiting global warming to 1.5°C is about 30 Gt CO2e for 2016–2050.During the next decade the annual emissions cap must decrease much faster than currently planned to meet the cost-effective budget.Achieving a globally cost-effective emissions path requires that the linear reduction factor (LRF) of the EU ETS cap for 2021–2030 is raised from currently 2.2% to at least 4%.Incorporating EU targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency, as well as national coal phase-outs, enables an increase of the LRF for 2021–2030 to 3.6% without an additional abatement burden on EU ETS installations.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandar Zaklan & Jakob Wachsmuth & Vicki Duscha, 2021. "The EU ETS to 2030 and beyond: adjusting the cap in light of the 1.5°C target and current energy policies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 778-791, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:6:p:778-791
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1878999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2021.1878999
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2021.1878999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Songyi & Fan, Qianqian, 2025. "Can market-based environmental regulation promote corporate intelligent transformation: Evidence from the carbon emission trading system," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Ping Li & Lijing Xu & Xuesong Gu & Yiduo Chen, 2025. "Emission Reduction Effect of Carbon Trading Policy Based on Multi-Period DID and Synergy Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-29, May.
    3. repec:osf:socarx:etu9g_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Beccarello, Massimo & Di Foggia, Giacomo, 2023. "Meeting decarbonization targets: Techno-economic insights from the Italian scenario," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2.
    5. Tan, Xiujie & Sun, Qian & Wang, Meiji & Se Cheong, Tsun & Yan Shum, Wai & Huang, Jinpeng, 2022. "Assessing the effects of emissions trading systems on energy consumption and energy mix," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    6. Felix Ekardt & Marie Bärenwaldt, 2023. "The German Climate Verdict, Human Rights, Paris Target, and EU Climate Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Lilit Popoyan & Alessandro Sapio, 2025. "Prevention first vs. cap-and-trade policies in an agent-based integrated assessment model with GHG emissions permits," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 309-354, April.
    8. Huang, Wenyang & Wang, Yizhi, 2024. "Identifying price bubbles in global carbon markets: Evidence from the SADF test, GSADF test and LPPLS method," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Aleksandra Kozłowska-Woszczycka & Katarzyna Pactwa, 2022. "Social License for Closure—A Participatory Approach to the Management of the Mine Closure Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Lamentillo, Anna Mae Yu, 2024. "A price tag on pollution: the case on carbon pricing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122913, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Massimo Beccarello & Giacomo Di Foggia, 2023. "Review and Perspectives of Key Decarbonization Drivers to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Vlad-Cosmin Bulai & Alexandra Horobet & Oana Cristina Popovici & Lucian Belascu & Sofia Adriana Dumitrescu, 2021. "A VaR-Based Methodology for Assessing Carbon Price Risk across European Union Economic Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:21:y:2021:i:6:p:778-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.