IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v53y2022i4p336-367.html

Job demands and well‐being in universities in the pandemic: A longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Wood

Abstract

Concerns about work intensification within universities have been an issue over the past decade and the Covid‐19 pandemic may have accelerated any trend toward excessive job demands associated with work‐related stress. This paper reports a longitudinal study conducted in two English universities based on observations at 11 time points from March 2020 to February 2021, covering academic and nonacademic workers. The results show that four measures of job demands increased during the period and that blended learning has contributed to these increases. Various measures of well‐being are negatively associated with work intensity, while work–nonwork conflict is positively related to it and mediates the demands–well‐being relationship. The study also shows that the use of a variety of methods of accommodating the increased demands—increasing total hours, working at weekends, extending the work day and forsaking breaks, normal holidays and exercise—are associated with increased work intensity. The policy implications of the study are that interventions aimed at employee well‐being should be focused on the causes of stress and, particularly, job demands, rather than coping with stress and that future decisions about homeworking should take account of these causes and not simply the satisfaction or performance levels of homeworkers.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Wood, 2022. "Job demands and well‐being in universities in the pandemic: A longitudinal study," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 336-367, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:53:y:2022:i:4:p:336-367
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tham, Tse Leng & Holland, Peter, 2018. "What do business school academics want? Reflections from the national survey on workplace climate and well-being: Australia and New Zealand," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 492-499, July.
    2. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aplin-Houtz Matthew J. & Ajaiyeoba Ifeyimika O. & Merrit Stephanie, 2025. "Love Under Duress: How Burnout Mediates the Relationship Between Partner Stress and the Perception of Romantic Partner Support," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 3-26.
    2. Massimo Magni & Manju K. Ahuja & Chiara Trombini, 2023. "Excessive Mobile Use and Family-Work Conflict: A Resource Drain Theory Approach to Examine Their Effects on Productivity and Well-Being," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 253-274, March.
    3. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Nathalie Greenan & Jean-Claude Sardas & Pascal Ughetto, 2020. "Organising the disconnection? Intense work and articulation of times and spaces in the design activities of an automotive company [Organiser la déconnexion ? Travail intense et articulation des tem," Post-Print halshs-03145158, HAL.
    5. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2023. "Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 795-814.
    6. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    7. Nurmi, Niina & Koroma, Johanna, 2020. "The emotional benefits and performance costs of building a psychologically safe language climate in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    8. Gajendran, Ravi S. & Loewenstein, Jeffrey & Choi, Hyeran & Ozgen, Sibel, 2022. "Hidden costs of text-based electronic communication on complex reasoning tasks: Motivation maintenance and impaired downstream performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    10. Killian Mullan & Judy Wajcman, 2019. "Have Mobile Devices Changed Working Patterns in the 21st Century? A Time-diary Analysis of Work Extension in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(1), pages 3-20, February.
    11. Anja-Kristin Abendroth & Antje Schwarz, 2023. "Digital Communication and Work–Life Supportive Supervisor Behaviors in Europe," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 198-210.
    12. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    13. Ruthanne Huising, 2014. "The Erosion of Expert Control Through Censure Episodes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1633-1661, December.
    14. Magdalena Smyk & Lucas van der Velde & Joanna Tyrowicz, 2025. "Paying for Ideal Discretion: A Framed Field Experiment on Working Time Arrangements," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 1-28.
    15. Christian P Theurer & Andranik Tumasjan & Isabell M Welpe, 2018. "Contextual work design and employee innovative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-35, October.
    16. Dumitru Miron & Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia David-Sobolevschi & Radu Cezar Cojocariu, 2021. "A Muldimensional Approach of the Relationship Between Teleworking and Employees Well-Being – Romania During the Pandemic Generated by the Sars-Cov-2 Virus," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 586-586, August.
    17. Jens Thoemmes, 2024. "Negotiating Telework in France: Collective Bargaining Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic," Post-Print hal-04619772, HAL.
    18. Haixia Wang & Pei Liu & Xiaoying Zhao & Aimei Li & Chenjie Xiao, 2022. "Work-Related Use of Information and Communication Technologies After Hours (W_ICTs) and Work-Family Conflict: A Moderated Mediation Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    19. Rainoldi, Mattia & Ladkin, Adele & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2025. "Digital nomads' work-leisure management practices," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Andrea Salvatori & Seetha Menon & Wouter Zwysen, 2018. "The effect of computer use on job quality: Evidence from Europe," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 200, OECD Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:53:y:2022:i:4:p:336-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.