IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i5p938-948.html

Institutional isomorphism in corporate Twitter discourse on citizenship and immigration in India and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Shehla Rashid Shora
  • Arshia Arya
  • Joyojeet Pal

Abstract

High net‐worth individuals (HNIs) play important roles in influencing policy through their voices. Technology‐mediated means of addressing issues, such as social media activism, have become a central part of such policy advocacy. We examined the Twitter engagement of the 50 wealthiest individuals and their ‘networks’ in India and the United States, specifically their engagement with citizens' movements and policy issues related to citizenship and immigration, with a focus on debates triggered by the enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), respectively. We quantified the level of engagement of ‘HNI networks’ with these debates through a textual analysis of their tweets using computational methods combined with manual annotation, followed by qualitative analysis and comparison of subjective meanings attached by actors to key terms. We found that American HNIs leveraged their social media presence to advocate for inclusive immigration and naturalisation policies, their model of advocacy characterised by confrontation, collective action and ownership by key actors, thus exhibiting mimetic isomorphism. Indian HNIs' tweets on CAA were few and far between, with no call for change and no evidence of either collective action or individual ownership, and a hesitation to challenge the central government, thus exhibiting coercive isomorphism.

Suggested Citation

  • Shehla Rashid Shora & Arshia Arya & Joyojeet Pal, 2023. "Institutional isomorphism in corporate Twitter discourse on citizenship and immigration in India and the United States," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 938-948, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:938-948
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Marquis & András Tilcsik, 2016. "Institutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1325-1341, October.
    2. Swati Agarwal & Sayantani Sarkar, 2022. "Topical analysis of migration coverage during lockdown in India by mainstream print media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean‐Thomas Martelli & Aasim Khan & Ralph Schroeder, 2023. "The sound, the fury and the silences: The politics of influence in digitalizing India," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 880-882, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kentaro Azuma & Nicolas M. Dahan & Jonathan Doh, 2024. "Shareholder reaction to corporate philanthropy after a natural disaster: an empirical exploration of the “signaling financial prospects” explanation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1421-1449, September.
    2. Alexander Mohr & Christian Schumacher, 2019. "The Contingent Effect of Patriotic Rhetoric on Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 94-110, June.
    3. Jeong, Nara & Kim, Nari & Arthurs, Jonathan D., 2021. "The CEO’s tenure life cycle, corporate social responsibility and the moderating role of the CEO’s political orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 464-474.
    4. Yusen Dong & Senhua Chen & Yixue Wu, 2023. "Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of investee peers corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1841-1855, July.
    5. Yang, Guang & Huang, Ruixian & Shi, Yukun & Jia, Zhehao, 2021. "Does a CEO's private reputation impede corporate governance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Licheng Yang & Shijie Song & Chunlin Liu, 2024. "Green signals: The impact of environmental protection support policies on firms' green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3258-3278, May.
    7. Jiao Luo & Aseem Kaul & Haram Seo, 2018. "Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2591-2617, October.
    8. Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2024. "Beyond profits: The linkages between local embeddedness, social legitimacy, and corporate philanthropy in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 555-565, January.
    9. Mirna Amirya, 2019. "What Drives the Institutionalization of Performance Measurement Systems in Indonesian Local Government?," GATR Journals jber166, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    10. Ye, Qin & Cai, Yue & Wang, Jingbei, 2024. "Navigating institutional complexity: How firms respond to conflicting patenting demands from competing institutional logics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Chung, Sung Hun (Brian) & Odziemkowska, Kate & Piazza, Alessandro, 2024. "Threading the Needle of Corporate Activism: How Firms Frame Their Stances on Polarizing Social Issues," OSF Preprints 2ejyp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    12. Xia Yang & Xin Gu & Xue Yang, 2023. "Listed peers' giving and corporate philanthropy: The motivations to imitate," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 108-124, January.
    13. Juelin Yin & Chunfang Cao & Fansheng Jia & Jiaxin Zhao, 2023. "Near and dear: How the politicians' home bias influences corporate philanthropy in China," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1042-1059, July.
    14. Reyes Calderón & María Ortiz De Urbina & Luis Expósito, 2023. "Follow the genuine leader: The “green imitation”," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 570-581, April.
    15. Liu, Yang & Ouyang, Zhe & He, Mujia, 2022. "Why and when firms respond accommodatively to the product-harm crisis: An institutional perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Yang, Na & Chen, Xuanyu, 2026. "Following the trend or not? How does peer pressure affect firm’s digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Heli Wang & Ming Jia & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Good Deeds Done in Silence: Stakeholder Management and Quiet Giving by Chinese Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 649-674, May.
    18. Wonsuk Cha & Ujvala Rajadhyaksha, 2021. "What do we know about corporate philanthropy? A review and research directions," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 262-286, July.
    19. Wang, Yanzhi, 2023. "Trade secrets laws and technology spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    20. Mark D. Heileman & Emmanuel T. Kodzi Jr & Timothy L. Pett, 2026. "The Choice of Customer Relationship Management Approach in the Supply Chain: Examining Small Business Performance," Vision, , vol. 30(2), pages 213-228, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:938-948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.