IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v11y2020is2p56-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boosting China’s Film Production: An Assessment of the Subsidies for China’s ‘Mainstream Films’

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolan Zhou

Abstract

Since 1991, the Chinese government has implemented a number of film policies which have sought to provide subsidies in order to promote this industry. Specifically, it is seeking to boost the so‐called ‘mainstream films’ which serve the purpose of distributing the state’s ideology and beliefs. However, these policies, such as tax relief and seat tax, have not helped to boost the production of this particular type of film. By drawing upon comparisons with subsidy policies in France and Korea, this paper provides explanations for why, after twenty years of market‐based reform in the film industry, China’s subsidies have not achieved the same results as these countries. In fact, they have deteriorated the quality and quantity of these mainstream films rather than helping them to become internationally more competitive. In this respect, this paper assesses the state of the mainstream film sector through the prism of Porter’s diamond model on competitiveness. This approach provides evidence of the real competitiveness of Chinese‐produced films, which could have crucial implications for the consistent application of ongoing subsidy policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolan Zhou, 2020. "Boosting China’s Film Production: An Assessment of the Subsidies for China’s ‘Mainstream Films’," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S2), pages 56-64, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s2:p:56-64
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard Hoekman, 2016. "Subsidies, Spillovers and WTO Rules in a Value-chain World," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(3), pages 351-359, September.
    2. Rodrik, Dani, 1996. "Coordination failures and government policy: A model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-2), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Dunning, John H., 1994. "Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 67-88, January.
    4. Chang Moon, H. & Rugman, Alan M. & Verbeke, Alain, 1998. "A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 135-150, April.
    5. Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Jörg Wuttke, 2017. "The Dark Side of China's Economic Rise," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s4), pages 62-70, June.
    6. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:62-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabyasachi Kar & Debajit Jha, 2021. "Divergent Policies for Convergence Clubs: A Study of PostReform Indian States," IEG Working Papers 449, Institute of Economic Growth.
    2. Azariadis, Costas & Stachurski, John, 2005. "Poverty Traps," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, Elsevier.
    3. Anwar, Sajid, 2005. "Variable labour supply, specialisation-based external economies, and capital inflow," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 427-437.
    4. Sanjaya Lall, "undated". "The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-1998," QEH Working Papers qehwps44, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    5. Zhang, Feng & Jiang, Guohua & Cantwell, John A., 2015. "Subsidiary exploration and the innovative performance of large multinational corporations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 224-234.
    6. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    7. Ki Han Song & Solsaem Choi & Ik Hyun Han, 2020. "Competitiveness Evaluation Methodology for Aviation Industry Sustainability Using Network DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Aerni, Philipp, 2012. "Applying New Growth Theory To International Trade," Papers 415, World Trade Institute.
    9. Marcela Miozzo & Lori DiVito & Panos Desyllas, 2011. "Cross-border acquisitions of science-based firms: Their effect on innovation in the acquired firm and the local science," DRUID Working Papers 11-17, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Zander, Ivo, 1998. "The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational corporation--dispersion, duplication and potential advantages from multinationality," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 17-35, May.
    11. Vella, Eugenia & Dioikitopoulos, Evangelos V. & Kalyvitis, Sarantis, 2015. "Green Spending Reforms, Growth, And Welfare With Endogenous Subjective Discounting," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1240-1260, September.
    12. Coyle, Diane & Muhtar, Adam, 2023. "Assessing policy co-ordination in government: Text and network analysis of the UK's economic strategies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Belderbos, Rene, 2001. "Overseas innovations by Japanese firms: an analysis of patent and subsidiary data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 313-332, February.
    14. Juan José García Ochoa & Juan de Dios León Lara & José Pablo Nuño de la Parra, 2017. "Propuesta de un modelo de medición de la competitividad mediante análisis factorial," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 775-791, Julio-Sep.
    15. Joseph F. Francois & Douglas Nelson, 2002. "A Geometry Of Specialisation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(481), pages 649-678, July.
    16. Rodriguez-Clare, Andres, 2007. "Clusters and comparative advantage: Implications for industrial policy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 43-57, January.
    17. Fred Block & Matthew R. Keller & Marian Negoita, 2020. "Network Failure and the Evolution of the US Innovation System," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 235-247, June.
    18. D P Angel & L A Savage, 1996. "Global Localization? Japanese Research and Development Laboratories in the USA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(5), pages 819-833, May.
    19. Corinna Doegl, & Dirk Holtbruegge, 2010. "Competitive advantage of German renewable energy firms in Russsia – An empirical study based on Porter’s diamond," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 34-58.
    20. Murphree, Michael & Petersen, Bui & Warrian, Peter & Gosine, Ray, 2022. "Scope and scale of technology challenge and MNE subsidiary knowledge sourcing in host countries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:11:y:2020:i:s2:p:56-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.