IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v38y2026i2p438-445.html

Partial Verifiability Induced Contests and Inefficient Policy‐Making

Author

Listed:
  • Octavian Strîmbu

Abstract

First‐price menu auctions (i.e., common agency) and all‐pay auctions are two of the main tools used to formalize and understand political behavior. In this paper, I propose a common agency model in which the interest groups are only able to partially verify and condition the transfers. This model turns out to be a form of all‐pay contest, since the interest groups play using mixed strategies. Surprisingly, an interest group equipped with better verification technology may actually bid less. Since the probability of winning is not always monotonic with respect to a verification technology, social welfare may decrease even as verification technologies improve. I argue that this is due both to the official's incentive constraint and to the flexibility of the interest groups' incentive schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Octavian Strîmbu, 2026. "Partial Verifiability Induced Contests and Inefficient Policy‐Making," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 438-445, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:438-445
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:438-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.