IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i1ne12816.html

The (un)targeted gendered vulnerabilities in Norwegian development aid—a corpus‐assisted discourse analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hilde Ousland Vandeskog
  • Jan Buts
  • Kristin Margrethe Heggen
  • Eivind Engebretsen

Abstract

Motivation Gender is a central concept and a buzzword in the development aid discourse. Like many buzzwords, its meaning is malleable. If aid efforts really are to “leave no one behind,” as the Sustainable Development Goals proclaim, we must critically interrogate how the discursive articulation of buzzwords such as gender can both make visible and hide from view vulnerabilities that should be salient for aid programming. In this article, we focus on the extent to which the mobilization of “gender” by Norwegian development aid non‐governmental organizations' is able to bring vulnerabilities related to sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression (SOGIE) to the fore. Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine a corpus of Norwegian NGO development aid policy and planning documents to analyse whether and how gender is articulated differently across different types of documents, and what this means in terms of which gendered vulnerabilities become visible. Approach and methods We draw on methods from corpus‐assisted discourse studies (CADS) to examine a purpose‐built corpus of 88 files pulled from framework funding applications submitted by four Norwegian aid NGOs to the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD). We analyse the results drawing on Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory to examine how conceptual translation between policy and programme‐level documents opens up space for the concept to be assigned changing meanings. Findings While the NGOs at policy level articulate a broad notion of gendered vulnerabilities that include recognition of SOGIE vulnerabilities, this is not translated into practical programme plans. At the programme plan level, gender is articulated as a subject field overwhelmingly concerned with women and firmly attached to a traditional binary sex‐gender construct. Policy implications Although SOGIE gendered vulnerabilities are increasingly acknowledged in NGO articulations of their priorities and values, this is not reflected in actual programme plans. We argue that this can lead to a misplaced expectation that these concerns are being addressed in the NGOs' activities, obscuring the neglect of SOGIE vulnerabilities in many development aid gender programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilde Ousland Vandeskog & Jan Buts & Kristin Margrethe Heggen & Eivind Engebretsen, 2025. "The (un)targeted gendered vulnerabilities in Norwegian development aid—a corpus‐assisted discourse analysis," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(1), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:1:n:e12816
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12816
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chimaraoke Izugbara & Meroji Sebany & Frederick Wekesah & Boniface Ushie, 2022. "“The SDGs are not God”: Policy‐makers and the queering of the Sustainable Development Goals in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(2), March.
    2. Allison Schnable & Anthony DeMattee & Rachel Sullivan Robinson & Jennifer N. Brass, 2021. "International Development Buzzwords: Understanding Their Use Among Donors, NGOs, and Academics," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 26-44, January.
    3. Susie Jolly, 2023. "Is development work still so straight? Heteronormativity in the development sector over a decade on," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 463-474, May.
    4. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    5. Kirsty Milward & Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay & Franz F. Wong, 2015. "Gender Mainstreaming Critiques: Signposts or Dead Ends?," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(4), pages 75-81, July.
    6. Susie Jolly, 2011. "Why is development work so straight? Heteronormativity in the international development industry," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 18-28, February.
    7. Abdelnour, Samer & Hasselbladh, Hans & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2017. "Agency and institutions in organization studies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86361, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Ruth Smith & Anna Mdee & Susannah Sallu, 2023. "How gender mainstreaming plays out in Tanzania's climate‐smart agricultural policy: Isomorphic mimicry of international discourse," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(6), November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Brown, 2024. "When development cooperation principles clash: Country ownership and LGBTQI+ inclusion in hostile environments," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(7), pages 2790-2804, October.
    2. Balazs Bodo & Primavera de Filippi, 2025. "Trust in context: The impact of regulation on blockchain and DeFi," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 740-760, July.
    3. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    5. Mariana Chudnovsky & Diana Martínez Medina & Agustín Filippo, 2026. "Parity in Public Administration as a Moving Target: The Role of Women Policy Agencies in Mexico," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 60-76, February.
    6. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    7. Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea & Pegdéwendé Nestor Sawadogo, 2019. "Assessing the effects of combating illicit financial flows on domestic tax revenue mobilization in developing countries," CERDI Working papers halshs-02019073, HAL.
    8. Ezeukwu, Ijeoma, 2026. "Closing The Domestic Peace Gap Applying the Domestic Peace Deficit Framework to SDG 5, SDG 16, and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda," SocArXiv 9f4js_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Pal, Narayan Das & Kumar, Nandan & Saxena, Abhishek & Harender, & Kumari, Khushboo & Singh, Desh Bandhu, 2026. "Annual overall energy, exergy and efficiency analyses for conical solar still consisting of flat plate collectors with/without PVT: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    10. Samed Yasin Öztürk & Gonca Yangın Ekşi, 2025. "Fostering Intercultural Competence through Telecollaboration on SDGs: A Multinational Study With Student Teachers," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    11. Marta Marson & Donatella Saccone & Elena Vallino, 2023. "Total trade, cereals trade and undernourishment: new empirical evidence for developing countries," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(2), pages 299-332, May.
    12. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    13. Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi & Md Mizanur Rahman & Lawrence Monah Ndam & Masahiro Hashizume, 2025. "A subnational socioeconomic assessment of family planning levels, projections, and disparities among married women of reproductive age in Cameroon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    15. R. Ebrahimi & S. Choobchian & H. Farhadian & I. Goli & E. Farmandeh & H. Azadi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Lampros Lamprinidis, 2025. "Socially Responsible Public Procurement and the Social Economy: European and Global Institutional Approaches," Journal of Public Policy and Administration, IPRJB, vol. 10(1), pages 46-62.
    17. Takala, Tuomo & Brockhaus, Maria & Hujala, Teppo & Tanskanen, Minna & Lehtinen, Ari & Tikkanen, Jukka & Toppinen, Anne, 2022. "Discursive barriers to voluntary biodiversity conservation: The case of Finnish forest owners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Ruiz-Valero, L. & Arceo, A. & Kesik, T. & Touchie, M. & O'Brien, W., 2025. "Life cycle assessment of housing and neighbourhoods: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Matteo Ferrazzi & Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Wen Li & Federica Costa & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2025. "From People to Performance: Leveraging Soft Lean Practices for Environmental Sustainability in Large-Scale Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Edema Odeworitse Meshach, 2025. "Determinants of Health Inequity in Sub-Saharan Africa Health Economics," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 3460-3474, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:1:n:e12816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.