IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A subnational socioeconomic assessment of family planning levels, projections, and disparities among married women of reproductive age in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi
  • Md Mizanur Rahman
  • Lawrence Monah Ndam
  • Masahiro Hashizume

Abstract

Background: Local-level socioeconomic gradients significantly influence access to reproductive health services in developing countries. This study examines disparities in family planning use among married women of reproductive age across Cameroon’s subnational territories, highlighting inequities often overlooked in national analyses. Furthermore, it incorporates HIV status (a key yet frequently omitted covariate) into the assessment of family planning determinants. Methods: A Bayesian hierarchical model incorporated with Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey cross-sectional data (between 1991 and 2018) was employed to generate estimates of family planning indicators per residence, wealth, and education categories within each region. Slope index of inequality was used to quantify disparities. The determinants analysis involved Bayesian logistic regression. Results: Estimates for 2023 revealed that the Centre region’s urban and rural areas had the highest modern contraceptive prevalence rate overall, with 49.0% (24.9–73.8) and 28.2% (12.4–52.3), respectively. The rural Far North had the least estimate [3.9% (1.5–10.5)]. Demand satisfied with modern methods was highest among Adamawa region’s richest quintile [82.9% (58.1 to 94.4)] and higher educated [85.9% (69.5 to 94.2)], and lowest among the East region’s poorest [5.3% (1.5 to 16.5)] and Far North’s none-educated [8.6% (3.3 to 20.4)]. Unmet need for modern methods was lowest among the West region’s richest [5.1% (1.8 to 13.5)] and highest among the Littoral’s poorest [23.1% (9.4 to 47.4)]. 2030 projections show the widest wealth- and education-based gaps for demand satisfied with modern methods in the Adamawa [27.0 percentage points (%p) (2.3 to 51.6) and 79.3%p (73.9 to 84.7), respectively]. Age ≥ 20 years, higher education level, practising Catholic/Christian religion, having ≥ one living child(ren), and higher household wealth quintile, were associated with increased odds of modern contraceptive use. Conclusion: Increased focus is essential on rural, poorer, and less educated populations, particularly in the Northern regions, to effectively address family planning inequities across Cameroon.

Suggested Citation

  • Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi & Md Mizanur Rahman & Lawrence Monah Ndam & Masahiro Hashizume, 2025. "A subnational socioeconomic assessment of family planning levels, projections, and disparities among married women of reproductive age in Cameroon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318650
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318650
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318650&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.