IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v16y2007i8p554-570.html

Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours – a conceptual framework for employee motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine A. Ramus
  • Annette B. C. Killmer

Abstract

Scholars in environmental management have called for better grounding of research on corporate greening within established organizational theories. We propose a conceptual framework (including suggestions for operationalizing it) that embeds empirical research within behavioural intent models and the concept of value‐creating prosocial behaviours. We argue that conceiving of corporate greening as a prosocial behaviour in this manner provides an improved understanding of the dominant factors that motivate employees to engage in ecoinitiatives. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine A. Ramus & Annette B. C. Killmer, 2007. "Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours – a conceptual framework for employee motivation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(8), pages 554-570, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:16:y:2007:i:8:p:554-570
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orts, Eric W. & Strudler, Alan, 2002. "The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 215-233, April.
    2. Annette B.C. Killmer & Catherine A. Ramus, 2004. "Motivation Theory Revisited: A Theoretical Framework for Peripheral Tasks," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 94(1), pages 101-132, January-F.
    3. Boas Shamir & Robert J. House & Michael B. Arthur, 1993. "The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 577-594, November.
    4. Buchholz, Rogene A., 1991. "Corporate responsibility and the good society: From economics to ecology," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 19-31.
    5. S. Antonio Ruiz‐Quintanilla & John Bunge & Adrienne Freeman‐Gallant & Ed Cohen‐Rosenthal, 1996. "Employee Participation In Pollution Reduction: A Socio‐Technical Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 137-144, September.
    6. Ramus, Catherine A., 2002. "Encouraging innovative environmental actions: what companies and managers must do," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 151-164, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burcu Ozgul, 2021. "The Influence of Green-Transformational Leadership Style on Corporate Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Propositions for Future Studies," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(90), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 379-388.
    3. Gaganis, Chrysovalantis & Leledakis, George N. & Pasiouras, Fotios & Pyrgiotakis, Emmanouil G., 2024. "Heroes or Villains? Culturally endorsed charismatic leadership style and stock price crash risk," MPRA Paper 122898, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Mai Chi Vu & Nicholas Burton, 2022. "Bring Your Non-self to Work? The Interaction Between Self-decentralization and Moral Reasoning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 427-449, November.
    5. Jérôme Ballet & Damien Bazin, 2004. "Prendre au sérieux les enjeux environnementaux," Post-Print halshs-01070785, HAL.
    6. Zhenjiao Chen & Yaqing Liu, 2020. "The Effects of Leadership and Reward Policy on Employees’ Electricity Saving Behaviors: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Weihua He & Naveed Mushtaq & Laraeb Jan, 2024. "Unlocking the dual black box of GHRMP & EGOC for sustainable environmental performance in developing economies: can green workplace behavior and green passion transmit the real change?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 16025-16055, June.
    8. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    10. Matthias Graf & Sebastian Schuh & Niels Quaquebeke & Rolf Dick, 2012. "The Relationship Between Leaders’ Group-Oriented Values and Follower Identification with and Endorsement of Leaders: The Moderating Role of Leaders’ Group Membership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 301-311, March.
    11. Hira Khan & Maryam Rehmat & Tahira Hassan Butt & Saira Farooqi & Javaria Asim, 2020. "Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: a mediation model," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Sunu Widianto & Celeste P. M. Wilderom, 2023. "Followers’ PsyCap and Job Performance: A Longitudinal COR Approach to Transformational Leadership as a Key Resource," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    13. Svanberg, Jan & Öhman, Peter & Neidermeyer, Presha E., 2019. "Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 121-131.
    14. Richter, Nicole Franziska & Hauff, Sven, 2022. "Necessary conditions in international business research–Advancing the field with a new perspective on causality and data analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    15. Yanhan Zhu & Jiang Wu, 2023. "Does charismatic leadership encourage or suppress follower voice? The moderating role of challenge–hindrance stressors," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(2), pages 595-620, April.
    16. Bazin, Damien, 2009. "What exactly is corporate responsibility towards nature?: Ecological responsibility or management of nature?: A pluri-disciplinary standpoint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 634-642, January.
    17. Nasir Javed Awan, 2024. "Unveiling Charismatic Leadership: Catalysts of Positive Work Attitude, Job Involvement, and Work Engagement," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 532-545.
    18. Gayoung Kim & Woo Jin Lee, 2021. "The Venture Firm’s Ambidexterity: Do Transformational Leaders Boost Organizational Learning for Venture Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Nadir Kolachi, 2015. "Effective Factors of Diversified HR and Relationship Management: A Qualitative Case Study on TokyaTech, NY," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 242-242, December.
    20. Kwok Leung & Tingting Chen & Guoquan Chen, 2014. "Learning goal orientation and creative performance: The differential mediating roles of challenge and enjoyment intrinsic motivations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 811-834, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:16:y:2007:i:8:p:554-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.