IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v84y2025i1p103-134.html

Charting the course: America's energy crossroads and the quest for a sustainable future

Author

Listed:
  • Simona‐Vasilica Oprea
  • Adela Bâra

Abstract

Energy and environment views of over 10,000 American respondents are captured in a complex survey created by the Pew Research Center (PRC). This paper is based on data collected during a panel wave that took place in May 2022. The survey aims to capture the nuanced perspectives of a nationally representative group of U.S. adults, with particular attention to ensuring participation from traditionally underrepresented or hard‐to‐reach demographics. To analyze the responses, we cluster raw and encoded data and identify the main groups of respondents and their characteristics. Three main clusters are identified using K‐means (silhouette score of .78) with a larger cluster “Mainstream Respondents” that shows moderate views on energy and environmental issues. The second cluster “Outliers or Niche Group” is the smallest cluster representing respondents with unique or extreme views, high income or education levels or specific demographic attributes that set them apart from the majority. The third cluster “Specific Interest Group” has moderate size and characteristics that are distinct but not as extreme as the second cluster. On the other hand, two more balanced clusters (4265/6017) are obtained with K‐modes (Davies–Bouldin Index 2.61) using the unencoded data: “Traditional Energy Advocates” highlights the cluster's preference for traditional energy sources over alternative or renewable energy sources (RES), and “Sustainable Future Supporters” emphasizes the cluster's support for environmental sustainability and RES. These names aim to succinctly capture the essence of each cluster's predominant attitudes toward energy and environmental issues, reflecting their preferences and priorities. The results are significant for understanding trends within the U.S. population, informing policymakers and contributing to academic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona‐Vasilica Oprea & Adela Bâra, 2025. "Charting the course: America's energy crossroads and the quest for a sustainable future," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(1), pages 103-134, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:84:y:2025:i:1:p:103-134
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12576
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albitar, Khaldoon & Al-Shaer, Habiba & Liu, Yang Stephanie, 2023. "Corporate commitment to climate change: The effect of eco-innovation and climate governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    2. Chien-Chi Lin & Chih-Ming Dong, 2023. "Exploring Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior, Perceived Value Theory, and Environmental Awareness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Lia Marchi & Licia Felicioni & Francesca Sabatini & Lidia Errante, 2023. "Exploring Energy Literacy in Italian Social Housing: A Survey of Inhabitants Preparing the Ground for Climate Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Thomas, Melanee & DeCillia, Brooks & Santos, John B. & Thorlakson, Lori, 2022. "Great expectations: Public opinion about energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Ugarte Lucas, Paula & Gamborg, Christian & Lund, Thomas Bøker, 2022. "Sustainability concerns are key to understanding public attitudes toward woody biomass for energy: A survey of Danish citizens," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 181-194.
    6. József Kádár & Martina Pilloni & Tareq Abu Hamed, 2023. "A Survey of Renewable Energy, Climate Change, and Policy Awareness in Israel: The Long Path for Citizen Participation in the National Renewable Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Paweł Bartoszczuk & Uma Shankar Singh & Małgorzata Rutkowska, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of Renewable Energy Contributions Considering Green Consumer Values—A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Santos, Georgina, 2022. "Climate change policy and carbon pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Ping Han & Zepeng Tong & Yan Sun & Xuefeng Chen, 2022. "Impact of Climate Change Beliefs on Youths’ Engagement in Energy-Conservation Behavior: The Mediating Mechanism of Environmental Concerns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorteau, Steve & Muzzerall, Parker & Deneault, Audrey-Ann & Kennedy, Emily Huddart & Rocque, Rhéa & Racine, Nicole & Bureau, Jean-François, 2024. "Do climate concerns and worries predict energy preferences? A meta-analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. van Dijk, Mathilde & Goedegebure, Robert & Nap, Jan-Peter, 2024. "Public acceptance of biomass for bioenergy: The need for feedstock differentiation and communicating a waste utilization frame," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Andrey Artemenkov & Olga E. Medvedeva & Alexander N. Pavlov & Omonjon Ganiev, 2025. "The Issues of Carbon Pricing in the Russian Federation: The Local and International Perspectives Under the Cost Approach and the Role of Afforestation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Yang, Ju-Ying, 2025. "Pathways to a sustainable energy future: A comparative case study of four Texas municipalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    5. Jinzhi Zou & Khairul Manami Kamarudin & Jing Liu & Jiaqi Zhang, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Mobility: Determinants of Intention to Purchase Used Electric Vehicles in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. He, Feng & Ren, Xingzi & Wang, Yueren & Lei, Xingfan, 2025. "Climate risk and corporate bond credit spreads," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. J. Hidalgo-Crespo & Andreas Riel, 2025. "Consumer Acceptance of Product as a Service Leasing Model for Home Appliances Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior in Ecuador," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 5749-5772, November.
    8. Ghaemi Asl, Mahdi & Ben Jabeur, Sami & Ben Zaied, Younes, 2024. "Analyzing the interplay between eco-friendly and Islamic digital currencies and green investments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Da Gao & Xiaotian Zhou & Xiaowei Liu, 2024. "The Bright Side of Uncertainty: The Impact of Climate Policy Uncertainty on Urban Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Huang, Zhehao & Dong, Hao & Liu, Zhaofei & Albitar, Khaldoon, 2025. "Unleashing the empowered effect of data resource on inclusive green growth: Based on double machine learning," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1270-1290.
    11. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    12. Li, Haitong & Lu, Lanting & Lin, Ziang & Meng, Tianze, 2024. "Digital innovation and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from firms' digital patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. Zhao, Shikuan & Abbassi, Wajih & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Zhang, Han, 2024. "How do government R&D subsidies affect corporate green innovation choices? Perspectives from strategic and substantive innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1378-1396.
    14. Zheng, Huanyu & Cai, Jinyang, 2024. "Driving Force or Barrier? The impact of climate change on the progress of green technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Shantanu Ashok Raut & Lia Marchi & Jacopo Gaspari, 2025. "A System Thinking Approach to Circular-Based Strategies for Deep Energy Renovation: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-27, May.
    16. Zhou, Zhifang & Yang, Zhuoxuan & Li, Huijia & Liu, Jinhao, 2025. "Regional climate change action and corporate ESG performance - Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Li, Fangmin & Goodell, John W. & Du, Anna Min & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "Ecological risk management: Effects of carbon risk on firm innovation investment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    18. Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Kesra Nermend, 2022. "Energy Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Tools—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-5, July.
    19. Habiba Al‐Shaer & Yang Stephanie Liu & Khaldoon Albitar, 2024. "Driving businesses towards a better climate: Macro and micro mechanisms to protect the planet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1810-1833, March.
    20. Małgorzata Tarczynska-Luniewska & Iwona Bak & Uma Shankar Singh & Guru Ashish Singh, 2022. "Economic Crisis Impact Assessment and Risk Exposure Evaluation of Selected Energy Sector Companies from Bombay Stock Exchange," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-25, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:84:y:2025:i:1:p:103-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.