IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v70y2026i1p239-254.html

Calorie Labelling of Delivered Meals for Healthier Consumer Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Wang
  • Wuyang Hu
  • Jian Li
  • Ping Qing

Abstract

Calorie information is often absent for delivered meals. We use a discrete choice experiment to examine how three calorie label strategies affect consumer choices for delivered meals: a numeric calorie label, a numeric plus traffic light calorie label and a physical activity calorie equivalent label. Relative to no label, all three strategies increase preferences for low‐calorie delivered meals. Consumers prefer medium‐calorie delivered meals more under the numeric and the numeric plus traffic light labels than under the physical activity calorie equivalent label. Conversely, the physical activity calorie equivalent label outperforms the numeric label in enhancing the market share of low‐calorie delivered meals. The numeric plus traffic light label is more effective than the numeric label in reducing the market share of high‐calorie delivered meals while increasing consumer willingness to pay for low‐calorie delivered meals. Furthermore, effects vary across meal categories and product characteristics. These findings underscore that flexible calorie labelling on delivery platforms can promote healthier choices and provide actionable guidance for industry stakeholders and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Wang & Wuyang Hu & Jian Li & Ping Qing, 2026. "Calorie Labelling of Delivered Meals for Healthier Consumer Choices," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 70(1), pages 239-254, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:1:p:239-254
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8489.70071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:1:p:239-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.