IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v69y2025i2p330-343.html

Can Community‐Based Payments Contribute to a More Equitable Distribution of Farm Income?

Author

Listed:
  • Atomu Nitta

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of community‐based payments on farm income inequality and the distribution of these across farm sizes, compared to individual‐based payments, using Gini decomposition by income source and the pseudo‐Gini coefficient. It uses a sample of Japanese paddy farms, which is suitable for an empirical comparison of the distribution and the distributional impact of community‐based and individual‐based payments. The empirical results show that the community‐based payments do not favour farms with higher farm incomes compared to individual‐based payments and are equally distributed across farm sizes. The findings suggest that the community‐based payment scheme can contribute to a more equitable distribution of farm income by ensuring a more equitable distribution of direct payments across farm sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Atomu Nitta, 2025. "Can Community‐Based Payments Contribute to a More Equitable Distribution of Farm Income?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(2), pages 330-343, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:2:p:330-343
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8489.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayes, Tanya & Murtinho, Felipe, 2018. "Communal governance, equity and payment for ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 123-136.
    2. Laurent Piet & Yann Desjeux, 2021. "New perspectives on the distribution of farm incomes and the redistributive impact of CAP payments," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(2), pages 385-414.
    3. Nitta, Atomu & Yamamoto, Yasutaka & Kondo, Katsunobu & Sawauchi, Daisuke, 2020. "Direct payments to Japanese farmers: Do they reduce rice income inequality? Lessons for other Asian countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 968-981.
    4. Severini, Simone & Tantari, Antonella, 2013. "The effect of the EU farm payments policy and its recent reform on farm income inequality," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 212-227.
    5. Läpple, Doris & Rensburg, Tom Van, 2011. "Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1406-1414, May.
    6. John C. H. Fei & Gustav Ranis & Shirley W. Y. Kuo, 1978. "Growth and the Family Distribution of Income by Factor Components," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 92(1), pages 17-53.
    7. Ito, Junichi & Feuer, Hart N. & Kitano, Shinichi & Komiyama, Midori, 2018. "A Policy Evaluation of the Direct Payment Scheme for Collective Stewardship of Common Property Resources in Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 141-151.
    8. Aaron Hanson, 2021. "Assessing the redistributive impact of the 2013 CAP reforms: an EU-wide panel study," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(2), pages 338-361.
    9. Kaditi, Eleni A. & Nitsi, Elisavet I., 2011. "Vertical and horizontal decomposition of farm income in equality in Greece," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(01).
    10. Mary Keeney, 2000. "The Distributional Impact of Direct Payments on Irish Farm Incomes," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 252-265, May.
    11. El Benni, Nadja & Finger, Robert, 2013. "The effect of agricultural policy reforms on income inequality in Swiss agriculture - An analysis for valley, hill and mountain regions," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 638-651.
    12. Severini, Simone & Tantari, Antonella, 2015. "The distributional impact of agricultural policy tools on Italian farm household incomes," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 124-135.
    13. Taisuke Takayama & Noboru Hashizume & Tomoaki Nakatani, 2020. "Impact of direct payments on agricultural land use in less-favoured areas: evidence from Japan [Effects of differing farm policies on farm structure and dynamics]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 157-177.
    14. Ito, Junichi & Feuer, Hart N. & Kitano, Shinichi & Asahi, Haruka, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of Japan's community-based direct payment scheme for hilly and mountainous areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 62-75.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nitta, Atomu & Yamamoto, Yasutaka & Kondo, Katsunobu & Sawauchi, Daisuke, 2020. "Direct payments to Japanese farmers: Do they reduce rice income inequality? Lessons for other Asian countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 968-981.
    2. Ciliberti, Stefano & Frascarelli, Angelo, "undated". "The role of CAP in enhancing farm incomes: the redistributive effect of direct payments in Italy," 147th Seminar, October 7-8, 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria 212244, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Atomu Nitta & Yasutaka Yamamoto & Simone Severini & Katsunobu Kondo & Daisuke Sawauchi, 2022. "Effects of direct payments on rice income variability in Japan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(1), pages 118-135, January.
    4. Severini, Simone & Tantari, Antonella, 2014. "The contribution of different off-farm income sources and government payments to regional income inequality among farm households in Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Laurent Piet & M Benoit & V Chatellier & K. Hervé Dakpo & N Delame & Yann Desjeux & P Dupraz & M Gillot & Philippe Jeanneaux & C Laroche-Dupraz & A Ridier & E Samson & P Veysset & P Avril & C Beaudoui, 2020. "Hétérogénéité, déterminants et trajectoires du revenu des agriculteurs français," Working Papers hal-02877320, HAL.
    6. Robert Finger & Nadja El Benni, 2021. "Farm income in European agriculture: new perspectives on measurement and implications for policy evaluation," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(2), pages 253-265.
    7. Deppermann, Andre & Offermann, Frank & Grethe, Harald, 2016. "Redistributive effects of CAP liberalisation: From the sectoral level to the single farm," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 26-43.
    8. Sadłowski, Adrian & Beluhova-Uzunova, Rositsa & Popp, József & Atanasov, Dimo & Ivanova, Boryana & Shishkova, Mariyana & Hristov, Krum, . "Direct Payments Distribution Between Farmers in Selected New EU Member States," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4).
    9. Severini, Simone & Tantari, Antonella, 2015. "The distributional impact of agricultural policy tools on Italian farm household incomes," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 124-135.
    10. Fabio Pierangeli & Luigi Biagini & Maria Rosaria Pupo D’Andrea & Simone Severini & Alessandro Sorrentino, 2025. "The CAP direct payments reform 2023–2027 in Italy: A path to fairer redistribution?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Ito, Junichi, 2022. "Program design and heterogeneous treatment effects of payments for environmental services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Shinichi Kitano, 2021. "Estimation of Determinants of Farmland Abandonment and Its Data Problems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Ollier, Maxime & De Cara, Stéphane, 2024. "Give and take: An analysis of the distributional consequences of emission tax-and-rebate schemes with an application to greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    14. Gabriela Trnková & Zdeňka Malá, 2013. "Analysis of inequality of gross added value of conventional and organic farms in selected EU countries," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(7), pages 2883-2891.
    15. Shinichi Kitano, 2020. "Formation Factors and Effects on Common Property Resource Conservation of Community Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Nadja El Benni & Robert Finger & Stefan Mann & Bernard Lehmann, 2012. "The distributional effects of agricultural policy reforms in Switzerland," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(11), pages 497-509.
    17. Severini, Simone & Tantari, Antonella, 2013. "The effect of the EU farm payments policy and its recent reform on farm income inequality," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 212-227.
    18. Zdeňka Malá & Gabriela Trnková, 2013. "Analysis of Unequal Distribution of Gross Value Added in Plant Production Business [Analýza nerovnoměrnosti rozdělení hrubé přidané hodnoty podniků polní výroby]," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 16(2), pages 169-183.
    19. Ebadi,Ebad & Russ,Jason Daniel & Zaveri,Esha Dilip, 2023. "Fit for (re)purpose ? A New Look at the Spatial Distribution of AgriculturalSubsidies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10414, The World Bank.
    20. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Qu, Jingjing & Li, Aijun & Liu, Xiaohong, 2021. "A new approach for evaluating technology inequality and diffusion barriers: The concept of efficiency Gini coefficient and its application in Chinese provinces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:2:p:330-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.