IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v56y2025i2p303-321.html

Food manufacturers’ compliance with the FDA's trans fat ban: Evidence from scanner data

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Rojas
  • Augusto Espín
  • Edward C. Jaenicke
  • Elina T. Page

Abstract

We use barcode‐level data in the US between 2012 and 2020 to document the evolution of trans fat content in manufactured food products before and after the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) 2015 determination that trans fats are not safe for human consumption (effectively a “trans fat ban”). First, we document how the number of products containing trans fat has declined over time. Second, using detailed information on household food purchases in retail stores, we quantify the corresponding reduction in total trans fat purchases. We find that although the number of trans fat products on the market has declined over time, products with a positive trans fat content continued to exist beyond the FDA's deadline for trans fat removal. We find a larger presence of trans fat products in small‐scale retailers (Dollar and Convenience stores) than in larger outlets (mass merchandisers and warehouse clubs). Similarly, trans fat products are relatively more prevalent in private label products and in products with a local presence. While trans fat purchases have declined over time, lower income households purchase product baskets with significantly larger amounts of trans fat. The findings can be used to guide more effective and efficient enforcement efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Rojas & Augusto Espín & Edward C. Jaenicke & Elina T. Page, 2025. "Food manufacturers’ compliance with the FDA's trans fat ban: Evidence from scanner data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(2), pages 303-321, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:56:y:2025:i:2:p:303-321
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.12877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12877
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.12877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt Allcott & Rebecca Diamond & Jean-Pierre Dubé & Jessie Handbury & Ilya Rahkovsky & Molly Schnell, 2019. "Food Deserts and the Causes of Nutritional Inequality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(4), pages 1793-1844.
    2. Cengiz, Ezgi & Rojas, Christian, 2024. "What drives the reduction in sodium intake? Evidence from scanner data," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    3. Aaron Adalja & Jūra Liaukonytė & Emily Wang & Xinrong Zhu, 2023. "GMO and Non-GMO Labeling Effects: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 233-250, March.
    4. Restrepo, Brandon J. & Rieger, Matthias, 2016. "Trans fat and cardiovascular disease mortality: Evidence from bans in restaurants in New York," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 176-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ezgi Cengiz & Christian Rojas, 2024. "Are food manufacturers reducing sugar content? Evidence from scanner data," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 571-595, July.
    2. Dichev, Ilia D. & Qian, Jingyi, 2022. "The benefits of transaction-level data: The case of NielsenIQ scanner data," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1).
    3. Feng, Junlong & Lee, Sokbae, 2025. "Individual welfare analysis: Random quasilinear utility, independence, and confidence bounds," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Martin O'Connell & Pierre Dubois & Rachel Griffith, 2022. "The Use of Scanner Data for Economics Research," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 723-745, August.
    5. Noriko Amano, 2018. "Nutrition Inequality: The Role of Prices, Income, and Preferences," 2018 Meeting Papers 453, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    6. Giuntella, Osea & Rieger, Matthias & Rotunno, Lorenzo, 2020. "Weight gains from trade in foods: Evidence from Mexico," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Huang, Wei & Xiang, Keyan & Yu, Xi & Zou, Hong, 2025. "Polluted air, healthier diets: Household food consumption patterns in response to air quality in China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. Bonnet, Céline & Détang-Dessendre, Cécile & Orozco, Valérie & Rouvière, Elodie, 2022. "Spatial spillovers, living environment and obesity in France: Evidence from a spatial econometric framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Margaryan, Shushanik, 2021. "Low emission zones and population health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Fernández Guerrico, Sofía, 2021. "The effects of trade-induced worker displacement on health and mortality in Mexico," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Ng, Marie & Gakidou, Emmanuela & Lo, Justin & Abate, Yohannes Habtegiorgis & Abbafati, Cristiana & Abbas, Nasir & Abbasian, Mohammadreza & Abd ElHafeez, Samar & Abdel-Rahman, Wael M & Abd-Elsalam, She, 2025. "Global, regional, and national prevalence of adult overweight and obesity, 1990–2021, with forecasts to 2050: a forecasting study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 318258, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    12. repec:osf:osfxxx:5xerm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Muriuki, James & Lawani, Abdelaziz, 2025. "Regional Disparities and Determinants of SNAP Store Retention in the U.S.: A Survival Analysis and Machine Learning Approach," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360881, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Hut, Stefan, 2020. "Determinants of Dietary Choice in the US: Evidence from Consumer Migration," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Yang, Bixuan & Asche, Frank & Li, Tao, 2021. "Food Price Inflation and Demand Shocks: Evidence from Chinese Cities during the Covid-19 Epidemic," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314067, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Bruno Larue, 2020. "Labor issues and COVID‐19," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 68(2), pages 231-237, June.
    17. Cody Cook & Rebecca Diamond & Jonathan V Hall & John A List & Paul Oyer, 2021. "The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2210-2238.
    18. repec:ags:aaea22:343976 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Huseynov, Samir & Palma, Marco A. & Ahmad, Ghufran, 2021. "Does the magnitude of relative calorie distance affect food consumption?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 530-551.
    20. Nano Barahona & Cristóbal Otero & Sebastián Otero, 2023. "Equilibrium Effects of Food Labeling Policies," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 839-868, May.
    21. Abe Dunn & Mahsa Gholizadeh, 2025. "The Geography of Consumption and Local Economic Shocks: The Case of the Great Recession," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 206-244, April.
    22. Brancatelli, Calogero & Inderst, Roman, 2021. "Income and Consumption over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Matched Administrative Data," EconStor Preprints 253665, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:56:y:2025:i:2:p:303-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.