IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v15y2025i5p23-49.html

Factors influencing pneumatic precision corn planter adoption in the Philippines: An empirical study using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)

Author

Listed:
  • Duan P. Mary Rose

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

  • Gonzales G. Gamaliel

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

  • Papaya Iway Harold Jay

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

  • Buot Pisao Amadito Jr.

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

  • Montebon Defensor Vincet Rhey

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

  • Moya S. Emmanuel

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

  • Mata Dumanacal Marlon

    (Cebu Technological University-Danao Campus, Danao City, PH)

Abstract

This study applies the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to evaluate the factors influencing the adoption of pneumatic precision planters in corn farming in the Philippines. Da-ta from 393 farmers were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine the relationships between Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), Behavioral Intention (BI), and three extended TAM constructs: Compatibility (CO), Observability (OB), and Personal Innovativeness (PI). The model was validated for reliability and discriminant validity, with the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) ranging from 0.664 to 0.823. Statistical significance was observed in ten out of twelve hypothesized relationships, indicating a high likelihood of adoption. This study extends TAM by incorporating external factors such as CO, OB, and PI, offering a deeper understanding of how these variables influence farmers’ perceptions of the technology’s usefulness and ease of use. The findings suggest that, for successful adoption, policymakers should focus on enhancing the visibility of the technology’s benefits, ensuring compatibility with existing farming practices, and promoting openness to innovation through targeted education and support. The results highlight the need for practical interventions, such as educational programs and demonstration projects, which could significantly improve technology adoption, productivity, and sustainability in Philippine agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan P. Mary Rose & Gonzales G. Gamaliel & Papaya Iway Harold Jay & Buot Pisao Amadito Jr. & Montebon Defensor Vincet Rhey & Moya S. Emmanuel & Mata Dumanacal Marlon, 2025. "Factors influencing pneumatic precision corn planter adoption in the Philippines: An empirical study using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 15(5), pages 23-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:23-49
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.5.3964.2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/3964/2456
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.15.5.3964.2025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    3. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2022. "Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt a technological innovation from a developing country context: The case of mobile augmented reality games," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Ilyoo Barry Hong, 2018. "Social and Personal Dimensions as Predictors of Sustainable Intention to Use Facebook in Korea: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Christopher R. Plouffe & John S. Hulland & Mark Vandenbosch, 2001. "Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions—Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 208-222, June.
    4. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    6. San Martín, Héctor & Herrero, Ángel, 2012. "Influence of the user’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 341-350.
    7. Bölen, Mehmet Cem, 2020. "From traditional wristwatch to smartwatch: Understanding the relationship between innovation attributes, switching costs and consumers' switching intention," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    9. Setyo Ferry Wibowo & Gatot Nazir Ahmad & Solekhah, 2020. "Perceived Value of Green Residence: The Role of Perceived Newness and Perceived Relative Advantage," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 443-456.
    10. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    11. Kulviwat, Songpol & Bruner II, Gordon C. & Al-Shuridah, Obaid, 2009. "The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 706-712, July.
    12. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    13. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    14. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. WeiYu Ji & Edwin H. W. Chan, 2019. "Critical Factors Influencing the Adoption of Smart Home Energy Technology in China: A Guangdong Province Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Hong-Wen Lin & Ya-Cing Jhan & Yuan Tseng, 2019. "Behavioral intention of using one-stop mobile application: evidence from department stores," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(12), pages 401-412, December.
    17. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Tang, Jia-Wei & Ou, Mei-Ling, 2024. "Applying the extended UTAUT-2 to assess the factors contributing to consumers’ usage intention towards over-the-top video streaming platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Spanjers, R., 2012. "Be patient : A longitudinal study on adoption and diffusion of information technology innovation in Dutch healthcare," Other publications TiSEM 594c1680-fb6d-4396-aaf6-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Escobar-Rodríguez, T. & Carvajal-Trujillo, E., 2014. "Online purchasing tickets for low cost carriers: An application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 70-88.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:23-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.