IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v7y2020i5p45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Motivation Factors on the Job Performance: A Case Study of Dangote Cement and Lafarge Cement Companies in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Eko Oluwajuwon Toheeb

    (Department of Management, Al-Madina International University, Kualalumpur-Malaysia)

  • Abdoul Rahman Mhd Al Jounaidi

    (Department of Management, Al-Madina International University, Kualalumpur-Malaysia)

  • Maged Mustafa Al-Dubai

    (Department of Management, Al-Madina International University, Kualalumpur-Malaysia)

Abstract

Human resources that are the backbone of catering for staff in an organization are needed by motivating the organization to prepare for a sustainable competitive advantage. Due to the highly dynamic and competitive business climate in which organizations, they need to establish strategies for recruiting and retaining the required staff, thereby motivating their employee. The development of strategies then makes the motivation to be the critical factor that is needed to create an enabling environment that aids optimal job performance of an employee in an organization. A productive workforce is the cornerstone of any organization, facilitating in a competitive environment the achievement of regulatory targets. Such methods or motivating factors are used by managers to increase employee productivity. Therefore, this research seeks to compare some of these motivation factors which include compensation, incentive, benefits, and reward on job performance in some organizations in Nigeria which are Lafarge and Dangote cement which are the most popular cement companies in Nigeria. This is study tries to determine the difference in the effect of factors (benefit, incentive, reward, compensation) on the job performance at Dangote cement and Lafarge cement. In this study, the analysis of the collected data is carried out using the Social Sciences Statistics System (SPSS). As descriptive statistics, simple statistical measures like the mean, standard deviation and average are used. The findings follow an inductive approach based on sample data. The study result shows the positive relationship between factors (benefit, incentive, reward, compensation) and job performance. The study concluded that Management should motivate consistent behaviour that adheres to motivation factors, to keep the employees working for the organization. for that purpose, motivation factors can be used to mediate the conversation among management and employees regarding the importance of the organizational problems. The study also recommended the organization should be responsible to keep pace whether their employees are performing organizational and societal duties effectively or not. it provides a way to monitor the ethical practices of employees, both within and outside the organization. further, the implementation of ethical practices should be motivated by leaders to improve employee performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eko Oluwajuwon Toheeb & Abdoul Rahman Mhd Al Jounaidi & Maged Mustafa Al-Dubai, 2020. "The Effect of Motivation Factors on the Job Performance: A Case Study of Dangote Cement and Lafarge Cement Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(5), pages 45-54, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:5:p:45-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-7-issue-5/45-54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/the-effect-of-motivation-factors-on-the-job-performance-a-case-study-of-dangote-cement-and-lafarge-cement-companies-in-nigeria8493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dr. Olivia Anku-Tsede & Ernestina Kutin, 2013. "Total Reward Concept: A Key Motivational Tool For Corporate Ghana," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 173-182, December.
    2. Gallagher, William E, Jr & Einhorn, Hillel J, 1976. "Motivation Theory and Job Design," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(3), pages 358-373, July.
    3. Abbott, M. & Doucouliagos, C., 2003. "The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 89-97, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dapeng Huang & Renhe Zhang & Zhiguo Huo & Fei Mao & Youhao E & Wei Zheng, 2012. "An assessment of multidimensional flood vulnerability at the provincial scale in China based on the DEA method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1575-1586, November.
    2. Alexandr Gedranovich & Mykhaylo Salnykov, 2012. "Productivity analysis of Belarusian higher education system," BEROC Working Paper Series 16, Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC).
    3. Horne, Jocelyn & Hu, Baiding, 2008. "Estimation of cost efficiency of Australian universities," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 266-275.
    4. Valentinas Navickas & Adriana Grenčíková & Karol Krajčo, 2021. "DEA model and efficiency of universities - case study in Slovak Republic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 348-362, September.
    5. David L. Anderson & John Tressler, 2009. "The Excellence in Research for Australia Scheme: An Evaluation of the Draft Journal Weights for Economics," Working Papers in Economics 09/07, University of Waikato.
    6. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    7. Oleg V. Leshukov & Daria P. Platonova & Dmitry S. Semyonov, 2015. "Does Competition Matter? The Efficiency of Regional Higher Education Systems and Competition: The Case of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 29/EDU/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    8. Johnes, Jill & Yu, Li, 2008. "Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 679-696, December.
    9. Valadkhani, Abbas & Ville, Simon, 2008. "Identifying the Most Research Intensive Faculties of Business in Australia: A Multidimensional Approach," Economics Working Papers wp08-03, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    10. Tyagi, Preeti & Yadav, Shiv Prasad & Singh, S.P., 2009. "Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 168-177, May.
    11. Mario Coccia & Greta Falavigna & Alessandro Manello, 2015. "The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 151-168, January.
    12. Xianmei Wang & Hanhui Hu, 2017. "Sustainability in Chinese Higher Educational Institutions’ Social Science Research: A Performance Interface toward Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Richard Heaney & Terry Evans & Peter Macauley & Margot Pearson, 2013. "The impact of Australian higher education policy changes on the production of PhDs in the field of accounting and finance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(3), pages 691-710, September.
    14. Ray, Subhash C. & Jeon, Yongil, 2008. "Reputation and efficiency: A non-parametric assessment of America's top-rated MBA programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 245-268, August.
    15. José Manuel Pastor & Lorenzo Serrano, 2016. "The determinants of the research output of universities: specialization, quality and inefficiencies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 1255-1281, November.
    16. Sun, Yu & Yang, Feng & Wang, Dawei & Ang, Sheng, 2023. "Efficiency evaluation for higher education institutions in China considering unbalanced regional development: A meta-frontier Super-SBM model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Cristian Barra & Roberto Zotti, 2016. "Measuring Efficiency in Higher Education: An Empirical Study Using a Bootstrapped Data Envelopment Analysis," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 22(1), pages 11-33, February.
    18. Gerhard Kempkes & Carsten Pohl, 2010. "The efficiency of German universities-some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(16), pages 2063-2079.
    19. George E. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes & Stavros A. Kourtzidis, 2010. "An application of statistical interference in DEA models: An analysis of public owned university departments' efficiency," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2010_17, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    20. Zhang, Daqun & Banker, Rajiv D. & Li, Xiaoxuan & Liu, Wenbin, 2011. "Performance impact of research policy at the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 875-885, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:5:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.