IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i5p1098-1103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Real Options Valuation Vs. Traditional NPV in Capital Budgeting Decisions: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Apurva Bhatnagar

    (SAGE University, Bhopal)

  • Dr. Rajeev Jain

    (SAGE University, Bhopal)

  • Dr. Santosh Mishra

    (SAGE University, Bhopal)

Abstract

Capital budgeting decisions are critical to a firm’s long-term strategic success. Traditionally, the Net Present Value (NPV) method has been the cornerstone of investment appraisal, offering a static assessment of expected future cash flows discounted at a risk-adjusted rate. However, the NPV approach does not adequately account for managerial flexibility under uncertainty. Real Options Valuation (ROV), derived from financial option theory, addresses this limitation by valuing the strategic choices embedded in investment projects. This paper explores both methodologies in depth, compares their strengths and limitations, and provides empirical and theoretical insights into when and how real options can enhance decision-making in capital budgeting.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Apurva Bhatnagar & Dr. Rajeev Jain & Dr. Santosh Mishra, 2025. "A Study on Real Options Valuation Vs. Traditional NPV in Capital Budgeting Decisions: A Comparative Study," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(5), pages 1098-1103, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:5:p:1098-1103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-12-issue-5/1098-1103.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/a-study-on-real-options-valuation-vs-traditional-npv-in-capital-budgeting-decisions-a-comparative-study/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:5:p:1098-1103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.