IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bin/bpeajo/v23y1992i1992-3p95-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance Structure, Managerial Characteristics, and Firm Performance in the Deregulated Rail Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ann F. Friedlaender

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Ernst R. Berndt

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Gerard McCullough

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann F. Friedlaender & Ernst R. Berndt & Gerard McCullough, 1992. "Governance Structure, Managerial Characteristics, and Firm Performance in the Deregulated Rail Industry," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 23(1992 Micr), pages 95-186.
    • Handle: RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:23:y:1992:i:1992-3:p:95-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1992/01/1992_bpeamicro_friedlaender.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation Inc., 1999. "The Privatization of New Zealand Rail Part 1: Assessment of History Markets and Data," Working Paper Series 3923, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    2. Felipe Aldunate, 2018. "Firm Competition and CEO Turnover: Evidence from US Railroad Deregulation," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(2), pages 451-476, June.
    3. NZ Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation Inc, 1999. "The Privatisation of New Zealand Rail," Treasury Working Paper Series 99/10, New Zealand Treasury.
    4. Coublucq Daniel & Ivaldi Marc & McCullough Gerard, 2018. "The Static-Dynamic Efficiency Trade-off in the US Rail Freight Industry: Assessment of an Open Access Policy," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 267-301, December.
    5. Joskow, Paul L. & Rose, Nancy L. & Shepard, Andrea., 1993. "Regulatory constraints on executive compensation," Working papers 3550-93., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. James M. MacDonald & Linda C. Cavalluzzo, 1996. "Railroad Deregulation: Pricing Reforms, Shipper Responses, and the Effects on Labor," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 50(1), pages 80-91, October.
    7. Quigley, Neil & Evans, Lewis, 1998. "Common Elements in the Governance of Deregulated Electricity Markets, Telecommunications Market and Payment Systems," Working Paper Series 3938, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    8. Laura Padilla-Angulo, 2020. "The impact of board diversity on strategic change: a stakeholder perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(4), pages 927-952, December.
    9. Siew Hoon Lim & C.A. Knox Lovell, 2009. "Profit and productivity of US Class I railroads," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(7), pages 423-442.
    10. Coublucq, Daniel, 2013. "Econometric analysis of productivity with measurement error: Empirical application to the US Railroad industry," DICE Discussion Papers 95, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    11. Christopher A. Vellturo & Ernst R. Berndt & Ann F. Friedlaender & Judy Shaw‐Er Wang Chiang & Mark H. Showalter, 1992. "Deregulation, Mergers, and Cost Savingsin Class I U.S. Railroads, 1974‐1986," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 339-369, June.
    12. Guido Friebel & Gerard McCullough & Laura Padilla, 2016. "Product Market Deregulation's Winners and Losers: US Railroads between 1981 and 2001," Working Papers 2016-005, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    13. Coublucq, Daniel, 2013. "Demand estimation with selection bias: A dynamic game approach with an application to the US railroad industry," DICE Discussion Papers 94, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation Inc., 1999. "The Privatization of New Zealand Rail Part 2: Quantitative Cost Benefit Analysis," Working Paper Series 3925, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:23:y:1992:i:1992-3:p:95-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Haowen Chen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esbrous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.