IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-3p2352-2367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Smart Manufacturing Readiness: A Maturity Model Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Yahya Hammad

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah)

  • Syed Radzi Bin Rahmaddulla

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah)

  • Puteri Fadzline Muhammad Tamyez

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah)

  • Ahmad Nazif Noor Kamar

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah)

  • Azim Azuan Bin Osman

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia.)

Abstract

The emergence of Industry 4.0 has transformed the manufacturing sector, necessitating established frameworks to appraise digital preparedness. To fill in the gaps in current models that ignore the particular obstacles faced by small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) and urban manufacturing firms, this study suggests a customized Urban Smart Factory (USF) maturity model. The approach incorporates essential elements, including sustainability, resilience, digitalization, and workforce competencies, providing a thorough assessment of smart manufacturing preparedness. Key research trends were diagnosed by bibliometric analysis, and case studies from several manufacturing sectors were used to validate the suggested model. According to the findings, a large number of firms inadequately use the instruments necessary to evaluate workforce and technology readiness, which leads to irregular attempts at digital transformation. By offering an organized framework for distinguishing technology gaps, assessing organizational adaptability, and facilitating the creation of strategic roadmaps for Industry 4.0 adoption, the USF maturity model fills this gap. By highlighting the connections between technology, human capital, and administrative processes, the study advances our acquiesce of digital transformation in the urban manufacturing framework and adds to the theoretical conversation. The recognition of the model provides useful information for businesses perceiving to advance their digital maturity while negotiating the challenges of smart manufacturing. Future studies should concentrate on incorporating cutting-edge technology like blockchain and artificial intelligence while broadening the model’s application through many businesses and geographical areas. Conclusively, our research creates the groundwork for manufacturing ecosystems that are robust, sustainable, and technologically sophisticated, spurring long-term growth and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Yahya Hammad & Syed Radzi Bin Rahmaddulla & Puteri Fadzline Muhammad Tamyez & Ahmad Nazif Noor Kamar & Azim Azuan Bin Osman, 2025. "Evaluating Smart Manufacturing Readiness: A Maturity Model Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 2352-2367, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3:p:2352-2367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-3/2352-2367.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/evaluating-smart-manufacturing-readiness-a-maturity-model-perspective/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling-Chu Lee & Yi-Yang Lee & Yi-Ching Liaw, 2012. "Bibliometric analysis for development of research strategies in agricultural technology: the case of Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 813-830, December.
    2. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    3. Imed Boughzala & Gert-Jan de Vreede, 2015. "Evaluating team collaboration quality : the development and field application of Collaboration Maturity Model," Post-Print hal-01245385, HAL.
    4. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Social Expectations and Market Changes in the Context of Developing the Industry 4.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Gavião, Luiz Octávio & Ivson, Paulo & Nascimento, Daniel Luiz de Mattos & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, 2021. "A fuzzy rule-based industry 4.0 maturity model for operations and supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Alexandre Moeuf & Samir Lamouri & Robert Pellerin & Simon Tamayo-Giraldo & Estefania Tobon-Valencia & Romain Eburdy, 2020. "Identification of critical success factors, risks and opportunities of Industry 4.0 in SMEs," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 1384-1400, March.
    7. Imed Boughzala & Gert-Jan de Vreede, 2015. "Evaluating team collaboration quality : the development and field application of Collaboration Maturity Model," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01245385, HAL.
    8. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2022. "Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Celina M. Olszak & Maria Mach-Król, 2018. "A Conceptual Framework for Assessing an Organization’s Readiness to Adopt Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-31, October.
    11. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Gozacan-Chase, Nazlican & Lafci, Cisem & Batista, Luciano, 2022. "Assessing smart circular supply chain readiness and maturity level of small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 375-392.
    12. Rohan Bennett & Todd Miller & Mark Pickering & Al-Karim Kara, 2021. "Hybrid Approaches for Smart Contracts in Land Administration: Lessons from Three Blockchain Proofs-of-Concept," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amran Bin Zakaria & Mohd Rashid Bin Ab Hamid & Imaduddin Bin Abidin, 2025. "Cultural Variations in Ethical Leadership: Insights into Governance, Integrity, and Organizational Practices," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(5), pages 2219-2232, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:761-782 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hala Hmamed & Anass Cherrafi & Asmaa Benghabrit & Sunil Tiwari & Pankaj Sharma, 2024. "The adoption of I4.0 technologies for a sustainable and circular supply chain: an industry‐based SEM analysis from the textile sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2949-2968, May.
    3. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Davis, Fred D. & Zhu, Yaping, 2022. "A cultural contingency model of knowledge sharing and job performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 202-219.
    4. Kumar, Anil & Agrawal, Rohit & Wankhede, Vishal A & Sharma, Manu & Mulat-weldemeskel, Eyob, 2022. "A framework for assessing social acceptability of industry 4.0 technologies for the development of digital manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Market Orientation and FIRMS' Environmental Innovation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Attitude," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 117-127, January.
    6. Rimalini Gadekar & Bijan Sarkar & Ashish Gadekar, 2022. "Key performance indicator based dynamic decision-making framework for sustainable Industry 4.0 implementation risks evaluation: reference to the Indian manufacturing industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 189-249, November.
    7. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Jajja, Shakeel Sadiq & Cao, Dongmei & Ma, Xiao, 2024. "Unpacking Digital Transformation: Identifying key enablers, transition stages and digital archetypes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. David E. Mills & Iman Izadgoshasb & Steven G. Pudney, 2021. "Smart City Collaboration: A Review and an Agenda for Establishing Sustainable Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Claudiu Cicea & Carmen Țurlea & Corina Marinescu & Nicolae Pintilie, 2022. "Organizational Culture: A Concept Captive between Determinants and Its Own Power of Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Spulbar Cristi & Cinciulescu Dumitru, 2025. "Advancing Knowledge In Financial Risk Management: A Bibliometric Approach," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 23-53, February.
    11. Jan Wiers & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research 2009–2019," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 441-464, December.
    12. Ana Filipa Fonseca & Fabíola Polita & Lívia Madureira, 2024. "How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Feyzollahi, Maryam & Rafizadeh, Nima, 2025. "The adoption of Large Language Models in economics research," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. Katherin Carrera-Silva & Olga Maritza Rodríguez Ulcuango & Paula Abdo-Peralta & Ángel Gerardo Castelo Salazar & Carmen Amelia Samaniego Erazo & Diego Haro Ávalos, 2024. "Beyond the Financial Horizon: A Critical Review of Social Responsibility in Latin American Credit Unions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    15. Ágnes Szukits, 2022. "The illusion of data-driven decision making – The mediating effect of digital orientation and controllers’ added value in explaining organizational implications of advanced analytics," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 403-446, September.
    16. José Carlos Vázquez-Parra & Marco Cruz-Sandoval & Martina Carlos-Arroyo, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship and Complex Thinking: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    19. Cinzia Colapinto & Issam Mejri, 2025. "The relevance of goal programming for financial portfolio management: a bibliometric and systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 917-943, March.
    20. Ahmad Saiful Azlin Puteh Salin & Suryani Abdul Raman & Nik Nurul Aswani Nik Kamarudin & Siti Nabilah Mohd Shaari, 2024. "Examining Islamic Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Current and Future Research– A Bibliometric Analysis," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 899-912.
    21. Xuejian Huang & Zhibin Wu & Gensheng Wang & Zhipeng Li & Yuansheng Luo & Xiaofang Wu, 2024. "ResGAT: an improved graph neural network based on multi-head attention mechanism and residual network for paper classification," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(2), pages 1015-1036, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3:p:2352-2367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.