IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i08p472-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Taxation on Economic Growth in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulmalik Omar

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Mulandi Victor Musyoki

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Musyoki Irene Muliwa

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Race Muthoni Wangechi

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Dennis Mbuthia

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Sammy Mbolu

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Dr. Robert Ombati

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

Abstract

The study was motivated by the increasing levels of taxation in Kenya as a result of the Increasing size of the Public Budget between over the years. The Study Period was between the years 2011 and 2020. The choice for the period was guided by the availability of Data and the increasing size of Kenya’s public budget which has made it necessary to increase the level of Taxation to counter the Budget deficit. The government of Kenya uses taxes as a means to generate revenue for its development objectives and provision of public goods like security and education. The main problem was that while the government uses taxes as a means to generate revenue they in turn generate both positive and negative impacts to the economy. In addition, money collected as a result of charging taxes always fall short of government expenditure necessitating the need for the government to borrow money. Various reforms have been made on tax policies in Kenya such as the recent Finance act 2021that was gazetted on 1st July 2021 which has broadened the coverage VAT tax increasing the prices of commodities therefore raising the standard of living. The general objective of the study was to investigate the effect of taxation on economic growth in Kenya while the specific objectives were to investigate the effect of income tax on economic growth in Kenya, to investigate the effect of VAT on economic growth in Kenya, To establish the effect of import duty on economic growth in Kenya and to investigate the effect of Excise duty on Economic growth as they are the four main forms of taxes the government of Kenya charges. The research aimed at answering the following research questions: Does income tax affect Economic growth in kenya? What is the effect of VAT on economic growth in Kenya and what is the effect of import duty on economic growth in Kenya? The study adopted the benefit theory, diffusion theory of tax incidence and endogenous growth theory and various previous researches like Nguluu (2017), Maingi (2010) and Murithii (2013) to show how economic growth in Kenya is impacted when Income tax, VAT, import duty and Excise duty are levied. Quantitative research design was applied with secondary data collected from C.B.K, K.N.B.S and K.R.A from the period 2011-2020 u. A Time series ARIMA regression model was then used to identify the relationship between the dependent and the independent variable and how the variables relate among themselves using STATA and SPSS. The estimated results showed that a 1% increase in Income tax leads to an increase in GDP by 0.678% holding all the other variables constant. A 1% increase in VAT leads to an increase in GDP by 1.480% holding all the other variables constant. A 1% increase in import duty leads to a decrease in GDP by 0.663% holding all the other variables constant and a 1% increase in Excise Duty leads to an increase in GDP by 2.783% holding all the other variables constant.The study concluded that that total Tax has a statisticaly significant relationship with economic growth with a P-value of 0.00. The study recommended that policy makers in the country should induce optimal and enabling tax policies that promote Economic growth and at the same time reduce leakages that happen in the tax system through evasions and avoidance by enacting tough laws against evaders and embracing an Online tax system for all tax payers.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulmalik Omar & Mulandi Victor Musyoki & Musyoki Irene Muliwa & Race Muthoni Wangechi & Dennis Mbuthia & Sammy Mbolu & Dr. Robert Ombati, 2021. "Effect of Taxation on Economic Growth in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(08), pages 472-487, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:08:p:472-487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-5-issue-8/472-487.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/effect-of-taxation-on-economic-growth-in-kenya/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Desislava Stoilova, 2017. "Tax structure and economic growth: Evidence from the European Union," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 1041-1057, Julio-Sep.
    2. Francisco L. Rivera-Batiz & Luis A. Rivera-Batiz, 2018. "Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Francisco L Rivera-Batiz & Luis A Rivera-Batiz (ed.), International Trade, Capital Flows and Economic Development, chapter 1, pages 3-32, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Ouma, Duncan O., 2019. "Revenue Effects of Tax Reforms, Economic Growth and Political Environment in Kenya," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 7(01), January.
    4. Bergstrom, Theodore & Blume, Lawrence & Varian, Hal, 1986. "On the private provision of public goods," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 25-49, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2016. "Unions, innovation and cross-country wage inequality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 104-118.
    2. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    3. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Iryna Topolyan, 2013. "The Attack-and-Defence Group Contests," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 049, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    4. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    5. Arthur C. Brooks, 2001. "Private Philanthropy and the Economics of Public Radio," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 41, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    6. Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Pichler, Stefan, 2012. "What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger? The Impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic on Economic Performance in Sweden," Working Paper Series 911, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    7. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    8. Cornes Richard & Sandler Todd, 2000. "Pareto-Improving Redistribution and Pure Public Goods," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 169-186, May.
    9. Andreas Löschel & Dirk Rübbelke, 2014. "On the Voluntary Provision of International Public Goods," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(322), pages 195-204, April.
    10. Wrede Matthias, 2003. "The Income Splitting Method: Is it Good for Both Marriage Partners?," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 203-216, May.
    11. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    12. Chen, Shuo & Li, Jianan & Yao, Qin, 2024. "Canal and trade: Transportation infrastructure and market integration in China, 1780–1911," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 793-812.
    13. Delgado, Michael S. & Khanna, Neha, 2015. "Voluntary Pollution Abatement and Regulation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Jochimsen, Beate, 2019. "Christmas lights in Berlin: New empirical evidence for the private provision of a public good," FiFo Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 19-04, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    15. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2001. "Productivity Differences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 563-606.
    16. Bartels, Lara & Kesternich, Martin, 2022. "Motivate the crowd or crowd- them out? The impact of local government spending on the voluntary provision of a green public good," ZEW Discussion Papers 22-040, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Guangfan Sun & Xin Lin & Junyi Chen & Nuo Xu & Ping Xiong & Hanqi Li, 2023. "Cultural inclusion and corporate sustainability: evidence from food culture and corporate total factor productivity in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Boadway, Robin & Song, Zhen & Tremblay, Jean-François, 2013. "Non-cooperative pollution control in an inter-jurisdictional setting," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 783-796.
    19. James Andreoni, 1998. "Toward a Theory of Charitable Fund-Raising," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(6), pages 1186-1213, December.
    20. Allouch, Nizar, 2017. "The cost of segregation in (social) networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 329-342.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:08:p:472-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.