IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2018i3p91-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

M&A and Crediting: the Hybrid Growth Strategy Seems to Be the Best for the Banks in Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Shustova
  • Vesselin Blagoev

Abstract

The development of the banking sector in Kazakhstan after 2015 raises a number of questions regarding the growth strategies that should be applied to overcome the problems with its sustainable development in a business environment, influenced by low prices of crude oil and an underdeveloped real sector. The state policy for bank consolidation and the active support of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan in solving liquidity problems of particular banks, namely Qazkom and Halyk Bank, has not led to the expected results. This analysis shows that a combination of external factors with organic growth strategy through intensive innovation of the crediting process as well as training of the personnel to minimize the influence of biases in the decision-making process, should be applied as well. Based on our overall analysis it is suggested, that hybrid strategy, which combines the benefits of external and organic growth strategies, would be more suitable under the specific conditions of Kazakhstan, and probably in any other country with similar market environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Shustova & Vesselin Blagoev, 2018. "M&A and Crediting: the Hybrid Growth Strategy Seems to Be the Best for the Banks in Kazakhstan," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 91-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2018:i:3:p:91-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=695661
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2007. "Disagreement, tastes, and asset prices," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 667-689, March.
    2. Menkhoff, Lukas & Nikiforow, Marina, 2009. "Professionals' endorsement of behavioral finance: Does it impact their perception of markets and themselves?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 318-329, August.
    3. Nelson Maina Waweru & Evelyne Munyoki & Enrico Uliana, 2008. "The effects of behavioural factors in investment decision-making: a survey of institutional investors operating at the Nairobi Stock Exchange," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 24-41.
    4. Bruno Biais & Martin Weber, 2009. "Hindsight Bias, Risk Perception, and Investment Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1018-1029, June.
    5. Michael Minkov & Vesselin Blagoev, 2014. "Is there a distinct Asian management culture?," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 209-215, April.
    6. Verma, Rahul & Soydemir, Gökçe, 2009. "The impact of individual and institutional investor sentiment on the market price of risk," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 1129-1145, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Shustova & Vesselin Blagoev, 2018. "Risk Management in the Internet Banking. The Case of Kazakhstan," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 135-146.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zamri Ahmad & Haslindar Ibrahim & Jasman Tuyon, 2017. "Institutional investor behavioral biases: syntheses of theory and evidence," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 578-603, May.
    2. Egan, Daniel & Merkle, Christoph & Weber, Martin, 2014. "Second-order beliefs and the individual investor," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PB), pages 652-666.
    3. Yevgeny Mugerman & Moran Ofir & Zvi Wiener, 2016. "How Do Homeowners Choose Between Fixed and Adjustable Rate Mortgages?," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(04), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Zamri Ahmad & Haslindar Ibrahim & Jasman Tuyon, 2017. "Behavior of fund managers in Malaysian investment management industry," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 205-239, August.
    5. Suresh G., 2024. "Impact of Financial Literacy and Behavioural Biases on Investment Decision-making," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 13(1), pages 72-86, January.
    6. Aneta Tomescu & Cezar Laurentiu Tomescu & Rodica Sîrbu, 2020. "Inovative Surgical Treatment for Intratubal Administration of Methotrexate," European Journal of Medicine and Natural Scinces Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, July -Dec.
    7. David Danz & Dorothea Kübler & Lydia Mechtenberg & Julia Schmid, 2015. "On the Failure of Hindsight-Biased Principals to Delegate Optimally," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1938-1958, August.
    8. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Joshua Zoen Git Hiew & Xin Huang & Hao Mou & Duan Li & Qi Wu & Yabo Xu, 2019. "BERT-based Financial Sentiment Index and LSTM-based Stock Return Predictability," Papers 1906.09024, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    10. Andrea M. Buffa & Dimitri Vayanos & Paul Woolley, 2022. "Asset Management Contracts and Equilibrium Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(12), pages 3146-3201.
    11. Das, Willy & Das, Satyasiba, 2018. "Role of Heuristic Principles On Crowd-Funder's Investment Decision Making," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 443-452, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    12. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    13. Gao, Bin & Liu, Xihua, 2020. "Intraday sentiment and market returns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 48-62.
    14. Gric, Zuzana & Ehrenbergerova, Dominika & Hodula, Martin, 2022. "The power of sentiment: Irrational beliefs of households and consumer loan dynamics," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Volker Thoma & Elliott White & Asha Panigrahi & Vanessa Strowger & Irina Anderson, 2015. "Good Thinking or Gut Feeling? Cognitive Reflection and Intuition in Traders, Bankers and Financial Non-Experts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Döttling, Robin & Lam, Adrian, 2023. "Does Monetary Policy Shape the Path to Carbon Neutrality?," OSF Preprints kqdar, Center for Open Science.
    17. Cauthorn, Thomas & Dumrose, Maurice & Eckert, Julia & Klein, Christian & Zwergel, Bernhard, 2023. "Rating changes revisited: New evidence on short-term ESG momentum," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    18. Larcker, David F. & Watts, Edward M., 2020. "Where's the greenium?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    19. Kleimeier, Stefanie & Viehs, Michael, 2021. "Pricing carbon risk: Investor preferences or risk mitigation?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    20. Xingchen Lv & Weijun Lin & Jun Meng & Linan Mo, 2024. "Spillover Effect of Network Public Opinion on Market Prices of Small-Scale Agricultural Products," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2018:i:3:p:91-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.