IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aye/journl/v10y2024i1p54-71.html

Redefining Organizational Culture for the Digital Age: A Model Proposal for Digital Organizational Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Merve GERÇEK

    (Department of Management and Organization, Hereke Omer Ismet Uzunyol Vocational School, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye)

  • Cem Güney ÖZVEREN

    (Institute for Aviation Psychology Research, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Abstract

As technology breakthroughs and digital innovations continue to transform business environ-ments, traditional organizational cultures are frequently found insufficient in promoting the innovative thinking, agility, and resilience needed for long-term success. This article presents a comprehensive framework for rethinking organizational culture in the digital age. The pro-posed model is designed to help organizations navigate the complexity and take advantage of the digitalized economy’s opportunities. Based on Schein’s organizational culture model, this study thoroughly examines existing literature to identify the essential elements of a digital culture framework. The suggested model prioritizes incorporating digital tools and mindsets at all levels of the organization, creating an atmosphere that promotes experimentation, coop-eration, and a proactive approach to survive in the digital era. Furthermore, the study explores the crucial elements in promoting and integrating digital values, the function of human re-source practices in facilitating the growth of digital skills, and the influence of digital culture on achieving a competitive advantage in the digitalized economy. By highlighting the crucial interaction between technology, people, and organizational processes, this study seeks to as-sist organizations in redefining their culture to thrive in the digital era by offering practical insights and a structured framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Merve GERÇEK & Cem Güney ÖZVEREN, 2024. "Redefining Organizational Culture for the Digital Age: A Model Proposal for Digital Organizational Culture," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 10(1), pages 54-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:10:y:2024:i:1:p:54-71
    DOI: 10.51803/yssr.1455398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://yssr.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1719570491-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.51803/yssr.1455398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George A. Marcoulides & Ronald H. Heck, 1993. "Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 209-225, May.
    2. Charles C. Snow & Øystein Devik Fjeldstad & Arthur M. Langer, 2017. "Designing the digital organization," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Schein, Edgar H., 1983. "The role of the founder in the creation of organizational culture," Working papers 1407-83., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    4. Nalan Yetim & Unsal Yetim, 2006. "The Cultural Orientations of Entrepreneurs and Employees’ Job Satisfaction: The Turkish Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Case," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 257-286, June.
    5. Junting Lu & Zhe Zhang & Ming Jia, 2019. "Does Servant Leadership Affect Employees’ Emotional Labor? A Social Information-Processing Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 507-518, October.
    6. Ioana BORCAN, 2021. "The Role Of Dynamic Capabilities, Business Model And Organizational Culture In The Digital Transformation Of A Traditional Organization," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 108-124, May.
    7. Hogan, Suellen J. & Coote, Leonard V., 2014. "Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1609-1621.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leslie A. Laam & George Godlewski & Wayne Psek, 2023. "A description and mathematization of an adaptation-based culture mechanism," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 363-390, June.
    2. O’Reilly, Charles & Cao, Xubo & Sull, Donald, 2024. "Organizational culture archetypes and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Rao Indu, 2009. "The Behavioral Equivalence of Organizational Culture," IIMA Working Papers WP2009-07-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    4. Mamatha S.V. & Geetanjali P., 2020. "Founder Leaders and Organization Culture: A Comparative Study on Indian and American Founder Leaders Based on Schein’s Model of Organizational Culture," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 23-33, January.
    5. Shepherd, Dean A. & Breugst, Nicola & Patzelt, Holger, 2023. "A founding-team model of creating a venture's culture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2).
    6. Roberto A. Weber & Colin F. Camerer, 2003. "Cultural Conflict and Merger Failure: An Experimental Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 400-415, April.
    7. Wilderom, C.P.M. & van den Berg, P., 2000. "Firm Culture and Leadership as Firm Performance Predictors : a Resource-Based Perspective," Other publications TiSEM fab301fd-cfea-4116-8cc6-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Wilderom, C.P.M. & van den Berg, P., 2000. "Firm Culture and Leadership as Firm Performance Predictors : a Resource-Based Perspective," Discussion Paper 2000-03, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    9. Aksoy, Hasan, 2017. "How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 133-141.
    10. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    11. Groza, Mark D. & Groza, Mya Pronschinske, 2018. "Salesperson regulatory knowledge and sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 37-46.
    12. Reuschl, Andreas J. & Deist, Maximilian K. & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Digital transformation during a pandemic: Stretching the organizational elasticity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1320-1332.
    13. Samuel Ogbeibu & Abdelhak Senadjki & Jude Emelifeonwu & Paramjeet Singh Vohra, 2020. "Inspiring Creativity in Diverse Organizational Cultures: An Expatriate Integrity Dilemma," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 28-41, March.
    14. Sung Ook Park & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim & Hyung Jong Na, 2021. "The Relationship between Corporate Culture and Value at Different Life Cycle Stages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Mariavittoria Cicellin & Donata Mussolino & Riccardo Viganò, 2015. "Gender diversity and father-daughter relationships: understanding the role of paternalistic leadership in family firm succession," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 97-118.
    16. Lynn E. Miller & Karen A. Simmons, 1992. "Differences in Management Practices of Founding and Nonfounding Chief Executives of Human Service Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(4), pages 31-40, July.
    17. Marius-Costel EÅžI, 2016. "A Theoretical Analysis of the Mission Statement Based on the Axiological Approach," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(4), pages 553-570, December.
    18. Sergii Bogachov & Aleksy Kwilinski & Boris Miethlich & Viera Bartosova & Aleksandr Gurnak, 2020. "Artificial intelligence components and fuzzy regulators in entrepreneurship development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 487-499, December.
    19. Pernille Gjerløv-Juel & Michael S. Dahl, 2012. "Spin-off Growth and Job Creation: Evidence on Denmark," Chapters, in: Guido Buenstorf (ed.), Evolution, Organization and Economic Behavior, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Lynn Sheridan & Dennis Alonzo & Hoa Thi Mai Nguyen & Xuesong Andy Gao & Tracy L. Durksen, 2025. "Teachers’ job engagement: the personal and job resources that matter," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General
    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aye:journl:v:10:y:2024:i:1:p:54-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Murat DONDURAN (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibytutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.