IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p1111-1119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Structural Relationship Between Organisational-Information System Related Support, Technology Self-Efficacy, And End-User Satisfaction With E-HRM

Author

Listed:
  • Hadziroh Ibrahim*

    (School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Faridahwati Mohd Shamsuddin

    (Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Yusliza Mohd Yusoff

    (School of Maritime Business and Management, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia)

  • Md. Lazim Mohd Zin

    (School of Business Management, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia)

Abstract

The study investigated the structural relationships between organisational information system (IS)-related support and end-user satisfaction with electronic human resource management (E-HRM) in government agencies in Malaysia, called human resource management information system (HRMIS). The moderating effect of technology self-efficacy on the relationships was also examined. A purposive sampling technique specifically judgment sampling was used to recruit participants in 14 state governments and ministries. To collect data, 990 questionnaires were distributed, of which 490 were used for data analysis. The results showed that of four dimensions of organisational IS-related support, only literacy support, technical support, and technology involvement support had significant and positive relationships with end-user satisfaction with HRMIS. Innovation support did not show any significant contribution. Unexpectedly, technology self-efficacy did not demonstrate any moderating effect, suggesting that organisational IS-related support is more crucial than prior computer skill to ensure the effective implementation of HRMIS in government agencies in Malaysia. The theoretical and managerial implications of the results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadziroh Ibrahim* & Faridahwati Mohd Shamsuddin & Yusliza Mohd Yusoff & Md. Lazim Mohd Zin, 2018. "The Structural Relationship Between Organisational-Information System Related Support, Technology Self-Efficacy, And End-User Satisfaction With E-HRM," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 1111-1119:6.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1111-1119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi6.11.1111.1119.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/6/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    2. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    3. Jose Sanchez & Mariano Aguayo, 2007. "An approach to the satisfaction of Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS): analysis and empirical contrast," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 177-214.
    4. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    5. Huub Ru‰l & Tanya Bondarouk & Jan Kees Looise, 2004. "E-HRM: Innovation or Irritation. An Explorative Empirical Study in Five Large Companies on Web-based HRM," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(3), pages 364-380.
    6. Sanchez-Franco, Manuel J., 2009. "The Moderating Effects of Involvement on the Relationships Between Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment in e-Banking," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 247-258.
    7. Huub Ru‰l & Tanya Bondarouk & Jan Kees Looise, 2004. "E-HRM: Innovation or Irritation. An Explorative Empirical Study in Five Large Companies on Web-based HRM," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(3), pages 364-380.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadziroh Ibrahim & Nur Zahiyah Othman, 2014. "The Influence of Techno stress and Organizational-Is Related Support on User Satisfaction in Government Organizations: A Proposed Model and Literature Review," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 63-71.
    2. Kamilah Kamaludin & Kamil Zaki Kamaludin, 2017. "User Acceptance of the Human Resource Information System: A Study of a Private Hospital in Malaysia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 207-217.
    3. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski & Mesut Atasever, 2022. "Internet Users’ Approach to HRM Portals in the Context of Sustainable Development—A Comparative Analysis of Poland and Türkiye," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Pavla Vrabcová & Hana Urbancová, 2021. "Use of human resources information system in agricultural companies in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(5), pages 173-180.
    6. Zia Ullah & Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Bilal Ahmed & Ilyas Ahmad & Muhammad Usman, 2021. "Perceived Accuracy of Electronic Performance Appraisal Systems: The Case of a Non-for-Profit Organization from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Jinjing Yang & Cong Cao & Chensang Ye & Yangyan Shi, 2022. "Effects of Interface Design and Live Atmosphere on Consumers’ Impulse-Buying Behaviour from the Perspective of Human–Computer Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Ascensión Barroso & Óscar R. González-López & Ramón Sanguino & María Buenadicha-Mateos, 2018. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Largest 500 Family Firms’ Websites through PLS-SEM Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Aurel TOTOLICI & Sofia TOTOLICI & Constanta POPESCU, 2013. "Successful Models of Implementation of e-HRM Systems in the Private Sector in Romania," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 71-78.
    10. Christof Miska & Günter K. Stahl & Matthias Fuchs, 2018. "The Moderating Role of Context in Determining Unethical Managerial Behavior: A Case Survey," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 793-812, December.
    11. Iustin IVLEV & Monica TRICULESCU, 2020. "E-Hrm €“ A Mean To Increase Hrm Role In Organizations €“ A Comprehensive Literature Review," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 789-799, November.
    12. Aurélie Girard & Bernard Fallery, 2011. "E-recruitement : From Transaction-Based Practices to Relationship-Based Approaches," Post-Print hal-00777779, HAL.
    13. Ahmet Alkan Çelik & Mert Kılıç & Erkut Altındağ & Volkan Öngel & Ayşe Günsel, 2021. "Does the Reflection of Foci of Commitment in Job Performance Weaken as Generations Get Younger? A Comparison between Gen X and Gen Y Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Natale Carlo Lauro & Maria Gabriella Grassia & Rosanna Cataldo, 2018. "Model Based Composite Indicators: New Developments in Partial Least Squares-Path Modeling for the Building of Different Types of Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 421-455, January.
    15. Basco, Rodrigo & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2022. "Advancing family business research through modeling nonlinear relationships: Comparing PLS-SEM and multiple regression," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3).
    16. Mercedes Rubio‐Andrés & María del Mar Ramos‐González & Miguel Ángel Sastre‐Castillo & Ignacio Danvila‐del‐Valle, 2020. "Exploring sustainability, good governance, and social responsibility in small and medium enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 852-869, March.
    17. Aurélie Girard & Bernard Fallery & Florence Rodhain, 2015. "Intégrer les médias sociaux dans les pratiques d’e-GRH ? Usages et enjeux pour les cabinets de recrutement," Post-Print hal-02060400, HAL.
    18. Yusliza Mohd.Yusoff Author_Email: yusliza@usm.my & T. Ramayah, 2011. "Factors Influencing Attitude Towards Using Electronic Hrm," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-274, Conference Master Resources.
    19. Ismael Barros-Contreras & Héctor Pérez-Fernández & Natalia Martín-Cruz & Juan Hernangómez B., 2023. "Can we make family social capital flourish? The moderating role of generational involvement," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 655-673, September.
    20. del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina & Blanco-González, Alicia & Hernández-Perlines, Felipe, 2022. "The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:1111-1119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.