IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/journl/v1y2015i4p608-617.html

Improving the quality of the industrial enterprise management based on the network-centric approach

Author

Listed:
  • Fedoseev, S. A.
  • Stolbov, V. Yu.
  • Gitman, M. B.
  • Pustovoyt, K. S.

Abstract

The article examines the network-centric approach to the industrial enterprise management to improve the ef ciency and effectiveness in the implementation of production plans and maximize responsiveness to customers. A network-centric management means the decentralized enterprise group management. A group means a set of enterprise divisions, which should solve by joint efforts a certain case that occurs in the production process. The network-centric management involves more delegation of authority to the lower elements of the enterprise’s organizational structure. The industrial enterprise is considered as a large complex system (production system) functioning and controlled amidst various types of uncertainty: information support uncertainty and goal uncertainty or multicriteria uncertainty. The information support uncertainty occurs because the complex system functioning always takes place in the context of incomplete and fuzzy information. Goal uncertainty or multicriteria uncertainty caused by a great number of goalsestablished for the production system. The network-centric management task de nition by the production system is formulated. The authors offer a mathematical model for optimal planning of consumers’ orders production with the participation of the main enterprise divisions. The methods of formalization of various types of uncertainty in production planning tasks are considered on the basis of the application of the fuzzy sets theory. An enterprise command center is offered as an effective tool for making management decisions by divisions. The article demonstrates that decentralized group management methods can improve the ef ciency and effectiveness of the implementation of production plans through the self-organization mechanisms of enterprise divisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fedoseev, S. A. & Stolbov, V. Yu. & Gitman, M. B. & Pustovoyt, K. S., 2015. "Improving the quality of the industrial enterprise management based on the network-centric approach," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(4), pages 608-617.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:4:p:608-617
    DOI: 10.15826/recon.2015.4.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/47440
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/recon.2015.4.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sah, Raaj Kumar & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1988. "Committees, Hierarchies and Polyarchies," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(391), pages 451-470, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan, 2017. "Is diversity in capabilities desirable when adding decision makers?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 395-402, March.
    3. Timothy Perri, 2018. "Economics of evaluation (with special reference to promotion and tenure committees)," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Stiglitz, Joseph E., . "Informacja i zmiana paradygmatu w ekonomii," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2004(3).
    5. repec:hbs:wpaper:21-131 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Tia Michelle McDonald & Maria I. Marshall & Michael S. Delgado, 2017. "Is Working with Your Spouse Good for Business? The Effect of Working with Your Spouse on Profit for Rural Businesses," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 477-493, December.
    7. Seh Hyun Yoo, 2026. "Technological regimes and R&D response to COVID-19," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-32, April.
    8. Gans, Joshua S., 1996. "On the impossibility of rational choice under incomplete information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 287-309, March.
    9. George W. J. Hendrikse, 1998. "Screening, Competition and the Choice of the Cooperative as an Organisational Form," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 202-217, June.
    10. Mateos-Garcia, Juan, 2017. "To Err is Algorithm: Algorithmic fallibility and economic organisation," SocArXiv xuvf9, Center for Open Science.
    11. Ioannides, Yannis M., 2012. "Complexity and organizational architecture," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 193-202.
    12. Ying Bao & Mengze Shi & Ajay Kalra, 2022. "Designing Product Development Contracts in the Presence of Managerial Lobbying," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6797-6818, September.
    13. KUFO Andromahi & SHTEMBARI Eriona, 2023. "How Board Size and Board Independence Affect Insurance Companies’ Performance," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    14. Myong-Hun Chang & Joseph E. Harrington, 1998. "Organizational Structure and Firm Innovation in a Retail Chain," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 267-288, December.
    15. Yurun Ge & Lucas Bottcher & Tom Chou & Maria R. D'Orsogna, 2024. "A knapsack for collective decision-making," Papers 2409.13236, arXiv.org.
    16. Luca Gius, 2025. "Disagreement Predicts Startup Success: Evidence from Venture Competitions," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 93-108, June.
    17. Aghion, Philippe & David, Paul A. & Foray, Dominique, 2009. "Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: Linking policy research and practice in 'STIG Systems'," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 681-693, May.
    18. Karagiannidis, Iordanis, 2010. "Management team structure and mutual fund performance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 197-211, April.
    19. Baharad, Eyal & Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Patal, Tal, 2020. "On the merit of non-specialization in the context of majority voting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 128-133.
    20. Alexander Lundberg, 2020. "The importance of expertise in group decisions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(3), pages 495-521, October.
    21. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:4:p:608-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Turgel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.