IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32125.html

Price Versus Stock Effect Policies For Reducing Excess Milk Production

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiser, Harry M.
  • Streeter, Deborah H.
  • Liu, Donald J.

Abstract

This article presents a comparative dynamic analysis of the market impact of alternative U.S. policies designed to reduce excess capacity in milk production. Two policy options are examined based on an econometric model of the dairy industry and a dynamic simulation of the system. The stock effect policy relies on voluntary reductions in cow numbers to reduce milk supplies, while the price effect policy makes use of reductions in the support price levels to achieve the same goal. The simulation results are used to evaluate equilibrium prices and quantities for the farm and retail markets, government costs, and consumer and producer surpluses from 1986 to 1995 for each policy alternative. The analysis shows that farmers are better off under a voluntary supply control program, while consumers are better off under a support price reduction policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiser, Harry M. & Streeter, Deborah H. & Liu, Donald J., 1988. "Price Versus Stock Effect Policies For Reducing Excess Milk Production," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-8, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32125
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32125/files/13020277.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Harry de Gorter, 1985. "Regulation in a Dynamic Market: The U.S. Dairy Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 821-832.
    2. Beach, Charles M & MacKinnon, James G, 1978. "A Maximum Likelihood Procedure for Regression with Autocorrelated Errors," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 51-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Forker, Olan D. & Liu, Donald J., 1989. "Generic Dairy Promotion Economic Research: Past, Present, and Future," Staff Papers 197587, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Judson, D.H., 1991. "An Assessment Of Deficiency Payments To Milk Producers In Japan," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(01), pages 1-13, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahman, Shahidur & King, Maxwell L., 1997. "Marginal-likelihood score-based tests of regression disturbances in the presence of nuisance parameters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 81-106.
    2. Aronsson, Thomas & Blomquist, Soren & Sacklen, Hans, 1999. "Identifying Interdependent Behaviour in an Empirical Model of Labour Supply," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 607-626, Nov.-Dec..
    3. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    4. R S Bivand, 1986. "The Evaluation of Norwegian Regional Policy: Parameter Variation in Regional Shift Models," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 4(1), pages 71-90, March.
    5. Chouinard, Hayley H. & Davis, David E. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 2005. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt82q751hf, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    6. Barry T. Hirsch, 1985. "Poverty, Transfers, and Economic Growth," Public Finance Review, , vol. 13(1), pages 81-98, January.
    7. Robert Mulligan, 1996. "Export-import endogeneity in the context of the Thirlwall- Hussain model: an application of the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test incorporating a Monte Carlo experiment," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 275-279.
    8. Epperson, James E. & Huang, Wan-Tran, 1992. "The Potential For Intraseasonal Market Flow Management Of Southeastern Sweet Potatoes," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 1-8, June.
    9. repec:rmk:rmkbae:v:9:y:mics:i:2:p:9(2 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "Bovine Somatotropin and Milk Production: Potential Impacts for the U.S," Staff Papers 121538, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Liu, Donald J. & Kaiser, Harry M. & Mount, Timothy D. & Forker, Olan D., 1991. "Modeling The U.S. Dairy Sector With Government Intervention," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Anders, Sven M. & Caswell, Julie A., 2006. "Assessing the Impact of Stricter Food Safety Standards on Trade: HACCP in U.S. Seafood Trade with the Developing World," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21338, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Neil R. Ericsson & Jaime Marquez, 1998. "A framework for economic forecasting," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 1(Conferenc), pages 228-266.
    14. G L Clark & M Gertler, 1985. "An Adjustment Model of Regional Production," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(2), pages 231-251, February.
    15. Uri, Noel D., 1995. "Estimating the U.S. demand for sugar in the presence of measurement error in the data," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 59-83, February.
    16. Beattie, Bruce R. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T., 2005. "The law of demand versus diminishing marginal utility," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0dv2v8xx, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    17. Tauer, Loren W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "Optimal Agricultural Policy with Biotechnology: Bovine Somatotropin and the Dairy Sector," Staff Papers 121536, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    18. Hayley H. Chouinard & David E. Davis & Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Jeffrey M. Perloff, 2010. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 59-76.
    19. Eswaramoorthy, K., 1991. "U.S. livestock production and factor demand: a multiproduct dynamic dual approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Shapiro, Daniel & Globerman, Steven, 2003. "Foreign investment policies and capital flows in Canada: a sectoral analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(10), pages 779-790, October.
    21. Wansbeek, Tom & Kapteyn, Arie, 1985. "Estimation in a Linear Model with Serially Correlated Errors When Observations Are Missing," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 26(2), pages 469-490, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.