IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/30009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Socioeconomic Analysis Of Marketing Information Usage Among Ohio Fruit Producers

Author

Listed:
  • Jones, Eugene
  • Batte, Marvin T.
  • Schnitkey, Gary D.

Abstract

Farm producers attempt to mitigate risk and uncertainty by utilizing accurate and reliable information. This research attempts to identify sources of information used by Ohio fruit producers and then determine which of these sources are best meeting their information needs. Results are based on a logit analysis of Ohio fruit producers and several factors are shown to influence producers' evaluation of the "adequacy" of their marketing information. Among these factors are age, business size, education, type of enterprise, and types of information sources. Reported findings have implications for marketing efficiency, particularly if producers' evaluation of information as adequate is positively related to its efficient use.

Suggested Citation

  • Jones, Eugene & Batte, Marvin T. & Schnitkey, Gary D., 1990. "A Socioeconomic Analysis Of Marketing Information Usage Among Ohio Fruit Producers," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:30009
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30009/files/22020099.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.30009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oral Capps & Randall A. Kramer, 1985. "Analysis of Food Stamp Participation Using Qualitative Choice Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(1), pages 49-59.
    2. Kihlstrom, Richard E, 1974. "A Bayesian Model of Demand for Information About Product Quality," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 15(1), pages 99-118, February.
    3. French, Ben C., 1977. "The Analysis of Productive Efficiency in Agricultural Marketing: Models, Methods, and Progress," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. French, Ben C., 1987. "Farm Price Estimation When There Is Bargaining: The Case Of Processed Fruit And Vegetables," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Bullock, J. Bruce & Ray, Daryll E. & Thabet, Boubaker, 1982. "Valuation Of Crop And Livestock Reports: Methodological Issues And Questions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-7, July.
    6. Bullock, J. Bruce & Ray, Daryll & Thabet, Boubaker, 1982. "Valuation of Crop and Livestock Reports: Methodological Issues and Questions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 13-19, July.
    7. Henry C. Lucas, Jr., 1975. "Performance and the Use of an Information System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(8), pages 908-919, April.
    8. Jon R. Miller & Michael J. Hay, 1981. "Determinants of Hunter Participation: Duck Hunting in the Mississippi Flyway," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 677-684.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caffey, Rex H. & Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr., 1994. "Factors Influencing Technology Adoption In A Louisiana Aquaculture System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Foltz, John & Lanclos, Kent & Guenthner, Joseph & Makus, Larry & Sanchez, William, 1994. "The Market For Information Services In Idaho Agriculture," A.E. Research Series 305128, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    3. Gerald F. Ortmann & George F. Patrick & Wesley N. Musser & D. Howard Doster, 1993. "Use of private consultants and other sources of information by large cornbelt farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 391-402.
    4. O'Brien, Phil & Morse, George W., 2006. "Minnesota Extension's Mixed Regional/County Model: Greater Impacts Follows Changes in Structure," Staff Papers 13614, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Amponsah, William A., 1995. "Computer Adoption And Use Of Information Services By North Carolina Commercial Farmers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-12, December.
    6. John Foltz & Kent Lanclos & Joseph Guenthner & Larry Makus & William Sanchez, 1996. "The market for information and consultants in Idaho agriculture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(6), pages 569-581.
    7. Hildebrand, Q. L. & Ortmann, G. F., 1994. "Use Of Information And Computers By Eastern Cape Dairy Farmers," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 33(2), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugene Jones & Marvin T. Batte & Gary D. Schnitkey, 1989. "The impact of economic and socioeconomic factors on the demand for information: A case study of Ohio commercial farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(6), pages 557-571.
    2. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Garcia, Philip & Hudson, Michael A. & Waller, Mark L., 1988. "The Pricing Efficiency of Agricultural Futures Markets: An Analysis of Previous Research Results," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 119-130, July.
    4. Martin, Larry & Richards, Robert R. & Usborne, W.R., 1979. "An Economic Comparison of Alternative Selling Methods for Slaughter Cattle in Ontario," Working Papers 245001, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Wang, H. Holly & Young, Douglas L. & Camara, Oumou M., 2000. "The Role Of Environmental Education In Predicting Adoption Of Wind Erosion Control Practices," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Spielman, Kimberly & Whipple, Glen & McLemore, Dan, 1982. "Estimation Of A Long Run Average Cost Curve Using A Frontier Function: An Application To The Tennessee Livestock Auction Market Industry," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279185, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Pang, Arwin, 2017. "Incorporating the effect of successfully bagging big game into recreational hunting: An examination of deer, moose and elk hunting," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 12-17.
    8. Lesser, William H. & Greene, W. H., 1980. "Economies Of Size And Operating Efficiency Of Livestock Markets: A Frontier Function Approach," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4, April.
    9. Iovanna, R. & Ando, A & Swinton, S. & Kagan, J. & Hellerstein, D. & Mushet, D. & Otto, C., 2017. "Assessing Pollinator Habitat Services to Optimize Conservation Programs," C-FARE Reports 260678, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).
    10. R. M. Wasantha Rathnayake, "undated". "Estimating Demand for Turtle Conservation at the Rekawa Sanctuary in Sri Lanka," Working papers 92, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    11. Huang, Ying, 2012. "an econometric study of the impact of economic variables on adult obesity and food assistance program participation in the NLSY panel," ISU General Staff Papers 201201010800003717, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Emerson M. Babb, 1986. "Production and operations management," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 421-429.
    13. McAleer, Michael, 1995. "The significance of testing empirical non-nested models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 149-171, May.
    14. Keppo, Jussi & Moscarini, Giuseppe & Smith, Lones, 2008. "The demand for information: More heat than light," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 21-50, January.
    15. Charles E. French & Randall E. Westgren, 1986. "Working with other disciplines: The role of agricultural economists in interdisciplinary agribusiness research," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 491-500.
    16. Caffey, Rex H. & Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr., 1994. "Factors Influencing Technology Adoption In A Louisiana Aquaculture System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-11, July.
    17. Yohan Pelosse, 2024. "Sequential Contest when the Precision of Observation is Endogenous," Working Papers 2024-02, Swansea University, School of Management.
    18. repec:dgr:uvatin:20100091 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Lillywhite, Jay M. & Simonsen, J., 2008. "Understanding Factors That Influence Breeders to Sell Bulls at Performance Tests," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Colacicco, Daniel & Langner, Linda L. & Piper, Steven & Schaible, Glenn D., 1990. "Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308085, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    21. Gertz, Christopher, 2016. "Quality Uncertainty with Imperfect Information Acquisition," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 487, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:30009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.