IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/308173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Barriers To The Development Of Organic Farming In Poland

Author

Listed:
  • ŁUCZKA, WŁADYSŁAWA

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe institutional barriers to the development of organic farming in Poland. As a secondary objective, this paper seeks feedback from organic farmers on measures taken by the institutional environment to promote the development of organic farming. This paper is based on literature reviews and selected findings from empirical research carried out in 2019 with 262 organic farms. The sample used in this study was representative of the general population of certified organic farms. The survey was a CAWI. The study found that organic farming faces many barriers, with frequent amendments to regulations being of key importance. This destabilizes and adds uncertainty to the functioning of organic farms. Another significant barrier are the high standards of organic production and low levels of financial and non-financial support. To a certain extent, these barriers result from the inefficiency of institutions surrounding organic farming. As a consequence, they are considered to poorly contribute to organic farming development.

Suggested Citation

  • Łuczka, Władysława, 2020. "Institutional Barriers To The Development Of Organic Farming In Poland," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:308173
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308173/files/1168295.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kata, Ryszard, 2008. "Potrzeby rolników w zakresie wsparcia ze strony otoczenia instytucjonalnego w warunkach członkostwa Polski w Unii Europejskiej," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 4(18), pages 1-11, May.
    2. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    3. Sterrett, Susan B. & Groover, Gordon E. & Taylor, Daniel B. & Mundy, Karen, 2005. "Describing Organic Agricultural Production In Virginia: Results Of The 2004 Farm Survey," Report Papers 14844, Virginia Tech, Rural Economic Analysis Program (REAP).
    4. Douglas H. Constance & Jin Young Choi, 2010. "Overcoming the Barriers to Organic Adoption in the United States: A Look at Pragmatic Conventional Producers in Texas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingyi Yang & Xiaopei Dai & Yijing Zhang, 2024. "The Government Subsidy Policies for Organic Agriculture Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans & Dagmara Stangierska & Monika Świątkowska & Agnieszka Bobola & Julita Szlachciuk & Maksymilian Czeczotko & Karol Krajewski & Ewa Świstak, 2021. "Factors Limiting the Development of the Organic Food Sector—Perspective of Processors, Distributors, and Retailers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Fanqi Zou & Tinghui Li, 2022. "The Impact of Agricultural Ecological Capital Investment on the Development of Green Circular Economy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Mariusz Malinowski, 2021. "An Attempt to Apply Canonical Analysis to Investigate the Dependencies between the Level of Organic Farming Development in Poland and the Chosen Environmental Determinants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Jr. Florendo Aala & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2021. "Farmer Decision-Making on the Concept of Coexistence: A Comparative Analysis between Organic and Biotech Farmers in the Philippines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Philippos Karipidis & Sotiria Karypidou, 2021. "Factors that Impact Farmers’ Organic Conversion Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Dominika Kuberska & Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezinska & Agnieszka Brelik, 2020. "Shaping Competitiveness Through Policy: The Case of the Organic Food Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1334-1354.
    8. Aleksandra Kowalska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Milena Bieniek & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning, 2023. "Declared non-buyers of organic food: A study of young British and Polish consumer profiles," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 28-50.
    9. Emilia Mary Balan & Cristina Georgiana Zeldea, 2023. "Bioeconomy in Romania: Investigating Farmers’ Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Xiaohong Zhou & Donghong Ding, 2022. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Willingness and Behaviors in Organic Agriculture Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data of Farmers in Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Magdalena Śmiglak-Krajewska & Stanislav Rojík & Pavlína Rojík Fulnečková, 2023. "Prices of Organic Food—The Gap between Willingness to Pay and Price Premiums in the Organic Food Market in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Elżbieta Antczak, 2021. "Analyzing Spatiotemporal Development of Organic Farming in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Władysława Łuczka & Sławomir Kalinowski & Nadiia Shmygol, 2021. "Organic Farming Support Policy in a Sustainable Development Context: A Polish Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Blum & Matthias Strebel, 2015. "Max Weber and the First World War: Protestant and Catholic living standards in Germany, 1915-1919," Economics Working Papers 15-04, Queen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast.
    2. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    3. Adam P. Balcerzak, 2011. "Institutional integration in the European Union. Suggestion for measurement," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(1), pages 17-34, December.
    4. Axel Dreher & Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Friedrich Schneider, 2014. "The devil is in the shadow: Do institutions affect income and productivity or only official income and official productivity?," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 158(1-2), pages 121-141, January.
    5. Chikán, Attila & Molnár, Boglárka & Szabó, Erika, 2018. "A nemzeti versenyképesség fogalma és támogató intézményi rendszere [The concept of national competitiveness and the institutional system to support it]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1205-1224.
    6. Marianne Rubinstein, 2001. "Gouvernement d’entreprise et innovation," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 63(3), pages 211-229.
    7. Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik, 2010. "Entrepreneurship and its Determinants in a Cross-Country Setting," Springer Books, in: Andreas Freytag & Roy Thurik (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Culture, chapter 0, pages 157-170, Springer.
    8. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    9. Wandel, Jürgen, 2009. "Agroholdings and clusters in Kazakhstan's agro-food sector [Agroholdings und Clusters in Kasachstan’s Agrar- und Ernährungssektor]," IAMO Discussion Papers 126, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Jacques Fontanel, 2000. "L’Etat, garant de l’intérêt général ou de certains intérêts particuliers," Post-Print hal-02880886, HAL.
    11. Josef Christl, 2006. "Regional currency arrangements: insights from Europe," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 209-219, December.
    12. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2014. "Monetary transmission mechanism analysis in a small, open economy: the case of Vietnam," OSF Preprints ybc8p, Center for Open Science.
    13. Carlos Esteban Posada, 1998. "Los mercados de instituciones y las instituciones endogenas," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 48, pages 149-168, Enero Jun.
    14. Ugur, Mehmet, 2010. "Institutions and economic performance: a review of the theory and evidence," MPRA Paper 25909, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2010.
    15. Engelbrecht, Hans-Jurgen, 1998. "A communication perspective on the international information and knowledge system," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 359-367, September.
    16. Michael Stuetzer & David B. Audretsch & Martin Obschonka & Samuel D. Gosling & Peter J. Rentfrow & Jeff Potter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 608-618, May.
    17. repec:zbw:iamodp:91766 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Damien Talbot, 2018. "Proximités et contrôles," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 1099-1119.
    19. Alan D. Morrison, 2010. "Knowledge Codification, Institutions And Financial Markets," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 78(s1), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Clarisse Cazals & A. Rivaud, 2014. "Sectoral heritage and performances of aquaculture [Patrimoine sectoriel et performances le cas de l'aquaculture]," Post-Print hal-01581325, HAL.
    21. Allan Drazen & Nuno Limão, 2018. "A Bargaining Theory Of Inefficient Redistribution Policies," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Policy Externalities and International Trade Agreements, chapter 7, pages 199-235, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:308173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.