IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i2p607-619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opportunities and Barriers to the Development of Organic Farming from the Perspective of Conventional Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Wladyslawa Luczka
  • Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska
  • Julia Wojciechowska-Solis

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the motives that guide farmers in running a farm, their intentions, and to assess the policy of developing organic farming. The aim of the study was to answer the following questions: what is the significance of environmental motives among conventional farms, to what extent are conventional farms interested in switching to organic farming methods, and what are the main reasons for the decision not to adopt an organic production system. Design/Methodology/Approach: The study applied a diagnostic survey method using a survey questionnaire conducted directly among 164 farmers running conventional farms. The survey questionnaire distinguished two types of conventional farmers, assuming the preferred motives and goals of choosing a farming system as the division criterion. The research results underwent statistical analysis. Findings: As a result of the research conducted, the most important motives for running a farm as well as the differences and similarities in assigning specific meaning to them, were determined. The research shows that the group of pragmatic farmers differs only slightly from the pragmatic-committed group in motives, as well as in the assessment of agricultural policy and the identification of the most important barriers to the development of organic farming. In the decision-making process regarding the choice of management method, the studied groups of conventional farmers are driven mainly by economic motives and, to a small extent, by environmental and social motives. In this respect, they are a uniform group. In identifying barriers to the development of organic farming, it is worth noting the great importance assigned by pragmatic farmers to the burdensome bureaucracy and control related to organic farming and frequent changes in legal regulations in this area. Practical Implications: The results of the study may be useful for developing a more effective policy for the development of organic farming by public administration entities involved in its implementation. In the future, this policy should be directed more towards stimulating the pro-environmental orientation of conventional farmers, which may increase the chances of converting some farms to the principles of organic farming. Originality/Value: The research provided new knowledge about the reasons for the low interest in organic farming among conventional farms. It may provide valuable information about the possibilities of increasing the number of organic farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Wladyslawa Luczka & Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2024. "Opportunities and Barriers to the Development of Organic Farming from the Perspective of Conventional Farms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 607-619.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:607-619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3862/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Fairweather, 1999. "Understanding how farmers choose between organic and conventional production: Results from New Zealand and policy implications," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 16(1), pages 51-63, March.
    2. Ziętara, Wojciech & Mirkowska, Zofia, "undated". "The Green Deal: Towards Organic Farming or Greening of Agriculture?," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 319704, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    3. Eva-Marie Meemken & Matin Qaim, 2018. "Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 39-63, October.
    4. Alon Tal, 2018. "Making Conventional Agriculture Environmentally Friendly: Moving beyond the Glorification of Organic Agriculture and the Demonization of Conventional Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Władysława Łuczka & Sławomir Kalinowski, 2020. "Barriers to the Development of Organic Farming: A Polish Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Shiksha Kushwah & Amandeep Dhir & Mahim Sagar & Bhumika Gupta, 2019. "Determinants of organic food consumption. A systematic literature review on motives and barriers," Post-Print hal-02559373, HAL.
    7. Łuczka, Władysława, 2020. "Institutional Barriers to the Development of Organic Farming in Poland," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kowalska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Milena Bieniek & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning, 2023. "Declared non-buyers of organic food: A study of young British and Polish consumer profiles," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 28-50.
    2. Luczka, Wladyslawa, 2023. "Problemy Rozwoju Rolnictwa Ekologicznego w Opinii Rolników," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    3. Xingyi Yang & Xiaopei Dai & Yijing Zhang, 2024. "The Government Subsidy Policies for Organic Agriculture Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Qian Forrest Zhang, 2024. "From Sustainable Agriculture to Sustainable Agrifood Systems: A Comparative Review of Alternative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Philippos Karipidis & Sotiria Karypidou, 2021. "Factors that Impact Farmers’ Organic Conversion Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Fanqi Zou & Tinghui Li, 2022. "The Impact of Agricultural Ecological Capital Investment on the Development of Green Circular Economy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Małgorzata Kobylińska, 2021. "Spatial Diversity of Organic Farming in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Xiaohong Zhou & Donghong Ding, 2022. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Willingness and Behaviors in Organic Agriculture Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data of Farmers in Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Jr. Florendo Aala & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2021. "Farmer Decision-Making on the Concept of Coexistence: A Comparative Analysis between Organic and Biotech Farmers in the Philippines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Aleksandra Kowalska & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning & Milena Bieniek & Radosław Mącik, 2021. "“Young and Green” a Study of Consumers’ Perceptions and Reported Purchasing Behaviour towards Organic Food in Poland and the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Maria Zuba-Ciszewska & Aleksandra Kowalska & Aneta Brodziak & Louise Manning, 2023. "Organic Milk Production Sector in Poland: Driving the Potential to Meet Future Market, Societal and Environmental Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Dr. Katarzyna Andruszkiewicz & Dr. Tomasz Wierzejski, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Generation Z Consumer Behavior in Poland and Germany: Implications for the Organic Food Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 181-202.
    13. Mariusz Malinowski & Luboš Smutka & Arkadiusz Sadowski, 2024. "Organic Farming as a Driver of Environmental Benefits or the Other Way Around? Environmental Conditions vs. Organic Farming Development in the EU with Particular Focus on Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, October.
    14. repec:ags:ijag24:344718 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Mariusz Malinowski, 2021. "An Attempt to Apply Canonical Analysis to Investigate the Dependencies between the Level of Organic Farming Development in Poland and the Chosen Environmental Determinants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Magdalena Śmiglak-Krajewska & Stanislav Rojík & Pavlína Rojík Fulnečková, 2023. "Prices of Organic Food—The Gap between Willingness to Pay and Price Premiums in the Organic Food Market in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Anna Mazurek-Kusiak & Bogusław Sawicki & Agata Kobyłka, 2021. "Contemporary Challenges to the Organic Farming: A Polish and Hungarian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Zielinski, Marek, 2022. "Organic farming in Poland as a source of public goods in areas particularly suited to its development," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 193(4), April.
    19. Władysława Łuczka & Sławomir Kalinowski & Nadiia Shmygol, 2021. "Organic Farming Support Policy in a Sustainable Development Context: A Polish Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Emilia Mary Balan & Cristina Georgiana Zeldea, 2023. "Bioeconomy in Romania: Investigating Farmers’ Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    21. Hanna Górska-Warsewicz & Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans & Dagmara Stangierska & Monika Świątkowska & Agnieszka Bobola & Julita Szlachciuk & Maksymilian Czeczotko & Karol Krajewski & Ewa Świstak, 2021. "Factors Limiting the Development of the Organic Food Sector—Perspective of Processors, Distributors, and Retailers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:2:p:607-619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.