IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/155140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Theory of Managing Wicked Problems through Multi-Stakeholder Engagements: Evidence from the Agribusiness Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Dentoni, Domenico
  • Ross, R. Brent

Abstract

Part Two of our Special Issue on wicked problems in agribusiness, “Towards a Theory of Managing Wicked Problems through Multi-Stakeholder Engagements: Evidence from the Agribusiness Sector,” will contribute to four open questions in the broader fields of management and policy: why, when, which and how multi-stakeholder engagements (MSEs) are effective actions for managers and policy-makers to deal with wicked problems. MSEs across private, public and non-profit sectors have been considered the collaborative paradigm of the 21st century to move beyond market and state failures (Austin 2000). Moreover, the agricultural and food arena provides a unique context to analyze managerial and policy decisions to undertake (or not undertake) MSEs. This is because agricultural and food chains face the highest number of urgent, interlinked wicked-problem issues that are scientifically uncertain, change over time and determine value conflict among stakeholders (Dentoni et al. 2012). Such issues include food security, climate change, deforestation, obesity, the use of technology in food production, violation of human rights and animal welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Dentoni, Domenico & Ross, R. Brent, 2013. "Towards a Theory of Managing Wicked Problems through Multi-Stakeholder Engagements: Evidence from the Agribusiness Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-10, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:155140
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.155140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155140/files/_1_%20Intro.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.155140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamilton, Hal, 2013. "Sustainable Food Lab Learning Systems for Inclusive Business Models Worldwide," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-6.
    2. Maria Seitanidi & Adam Lindgreen, 2010. "Editorial: Cross-Sector Social Interactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 1-7, July.
    3. Cavicchi, Alessio & Rinaldi, Chiara & Corsi, Michele, 2013. "Higher Education Institutions as Managers of Wicked Problems: Place Branding and Rural Development in Marche Region, Italy," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-18.
    4. Pesqueira, Luli & Verburg, Johan, 2012. "NGO-Business Interaction for Social Change: Insights from Oxfam’s Private Sector Programme," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Dentoni, Domenico & Hospes, Otto & Ross, R. Brent, 2012. "Managing Wicked Problems in Agribusiness: The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Engagements in Value Creation," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Pieters, Reinder & Glockner, Hans-Heinrich & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno) & Weijers, Stef, 2012. "Dutch Logistics Service Providers and Sustainable Physical Distribution: Searching for Focus," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Blok, Vincent & Sjauw-Koen-Fa, August & Omta, Onno, 2013. "Effective Stakeholder Involvement at the Base of the Pyramid: The Case of Rabobank," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-6.
    8. Dentoni, Domenico & Veldhuizen, Margreeth, 2012. "Building Capabilities for Multi-Stakeholder Interactions at Global and Local Levels: The case of Unilever," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Waddock, Sandra, 2012. "More than Coping: Thriving in a World of Wicked Problems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-6, December.
    10. Julia Roloff, 2008. "Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 233-250, September.
    11. Peterson, H. Christopher, 2013. "Fundamental Principles of Managing Multi-Stakeholder Engagement," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-12.
    12. Bos, Jacqueline M. & Blok, Vincent & Tulder, Rob van, 2013. "From Confrontation to Partnerships: The Role of a Dutch Non-Governmental Organization in Co-Creating a Market to Address the Issue of Animal Welfare," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-7.
    13. Wubben, Emiel F.M. & Nuhoff-Isakhanyan, Gohar, 2013. "The Wicked Problem of Promoting Sustainability by Means of Enhanced Biomass Utilization," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-6.
    14. Schouten, Greetje & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "Private Multi-stakeholder Governance in the Agricultural Market Place: An Analysis of Legitimization Processes of the Roundtables on Sustainable Palm Oil and Responsible Soy," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Connolly, Aidan J. & Phillips-Connolly, Kate, 2012. "Can Agribusiness Feed 3 Billion New People…and Save the Planet? A GLIMPSE into the Future," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Allan P. O. Williams, 2006. "Leadership in Change," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Rise of Cass Business School, chapter 15, pages 200-220, Palgrave Macmillan.
    17. Waddell, Steve & McLachlan, Milla & Dentoni, Domenico, 2013. "Learning & Transformative Networks to Address Wicked Problems: A GOLDEN Invitation," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-10.
    18. Hospes, Otto & Valk, Olga van der & Mheen-Sluijer, Jennie van der, 2012. "Parallel Development of Five Partnerships to Promote Sustainable Soy in Brazil: Solution or Part of Wicked Problems?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Bitzer, Verena, 2012. "Partnering for Change in Chains: the Capacity of Partnerships to Promote Sustainable Change in Global Agrifood Chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Schouten, Greetje & Leroy, Pieter & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ross, R. Brent & Pandey, Vivek & Ross, Kara L., 2015. "Sustainability and Strategy in U.S. Agri-Food Firms: An Assessment of Current Practices," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(01), pages 1-32, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dentoni, Domenico & Hospes, Otto & Ross, R. Brent, 2012. "Managing Wicked Problems in Agribusiness: The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Engagements in Value Creation," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    3. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Stefano Pascucci, 2016. "Cross-Sector Partnerships and the Co-creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    4. Bos, Jacqueline M. & Blok, Vincent & Tulder, Rob van, 2013. "From Confrontation to Partnerships: The Role of a Dutch Non-Governmental Organization in Co-Creating a Market to Address the Issue of Animal Welfare," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-7.
    5. Schouten, Greetje & Bitzer, Verena, 2015. "The emergence of Southern standards in agricultural value chains: A new trend in sustainability governance?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 175-184.
    6. Keith D. Harris & Harvey S. James, 2016. "The Production of Food and Fiber: An Adaptation of CoP Features for Sustainable Water Use in Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Hidayat, Kurniawati Nia & Glasbergen, Pieter & Offermans, Astrid, 2015. "Sustainability Certification and Palm Oil Smallholders’ Livelihood: A Comparison between Scheme Smallholders and Independent Smallholders in Indonesia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Gauly, Sarah & Müller, Andreas & Spiller, Achim, 2017. "Uncovering strategies of hidden intention in multi-stakeholder initiatives: the case of pasture-raised milk," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260768, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    9. Giacomo Blasi & Angelo Caruso & Elena Vigan?, 2016. "Progettazione partecipata di una mensa scolastica sostenibile mediante lo sviluppo di un Business Model Canvas," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 18(3), pages 319-344.
    10. Greetje Schouten & Otto Hospes, 2018. "Public and Private Governance in Interaction: Changing Interpretations of Sovereignty in the Field of Sustainable Palm Oil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Sjauw-Koen-Fa, August R. & Blok, Vincent & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2016. "Critical Success Factors for Smallholder Inclusion in High Value-Adding Supply Chains by Food & Agribusiness Multinational Enterprise," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(01), pages 1-30, February.
    12. Paul T. M. Ingenbleek & Domenico Dentoni, 2016. "Learning from Stakeholder Pressure and Embeddedness: The Roles of Absorptive Capacity in the Corporate Social Responsibility of Dutch Agribusinesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Bennett, Elizabeth A., 2017. "Who Governs Socially-Oriented Voluntary Sustainability Standards? Not the Producers of Certified Products," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 53-69.
    14. Janina Grabs & Graeme Auld & Benjamin Cashore, 2021. "Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1183-1208, October.
    15. Glasbergen, Pieter, 2018. "Smallholders do not Eat Certificates," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 243-252.
    16. Anica Zeyen & Markus Beckmann & Stella Wolters, 2016. "Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 341-360, May.
    17. Otto Hospes, 2014. "Marking the success or end of global multi-stakeholder governance? The rise of national sustainability standards in Indonesia and Brazil for palm oil and soy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 31(3), pages 425-437, September.
    18. Wubben, Emiel F.M. & Nuhoff-Isakhanyan, Gohar, 2013. "The Wicked Problem of Promoting Sustainability by Means of Enhanced Biomass Utilization," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-6.
    19. Sarah L. Stattman & Aarti Gupta & Lena Partzsch & Peter Oosterveer, 2018. "Toward Sustainable Biofuels in the European Union? Lessons from a Decade of Hybrid Biofuel Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Cordula Hinkes, 2020. "Adding (bio)fuel to the fire: discourses on palm oil sustainability in the context of European policy development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7661-7682, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:155140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.