IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/apstra/265593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Choice And Agricultural Labour Efficiency In Nigeria: Impact Of Icts

Author

Listed:
  • Egbe Bassey Etowa
  • Olugbenga Wilson Adejo

Abstract

Increased labour efficiency is imperative in the developing world and particularly in Nigerian Agriculture which should be in its leaping phase. The interaction between labour efficiency and ICTs is inevitable in the realisation of the nation’s agribusiness potentials. Following a vivid descriptive statistics on main occupations and access to ICTs among the Nigerian populace, this study assessed effects of ICTs on the probability that a working aged Nigerian chose agricultural occupation over non-agricultural occupations. In doing so, the study analysed the effects of access to ICTs on agricultural labour efficiency in Nigeria. Data used for the analysis were drawn from the Nigerian General Household Survey-Panel held in 2010-2011 period. Analytical framework for the study include: Logistic Regression and Multiple Regression Models. Results show that access to mobile phones, using the internet to obtain information, and using the internet to send or receive mails were significant factors of the probability that a Nigerian chose agriculture or its related activities as a main occupation. Again, access to personal computers, use of the internet for e-banking, e-learning and for reading e-newspapers had significant impact on agricultural labour efficiency in Nigeria. The study recommends that labour policies should find a place for the role of ICTs, particularly the internet.

Suggested Citation

  • Egbe Bassey Etowa & Olugbenga Wilson Adejo, 2017. "Occupational Choice And Agricultural Labour Efficiency In Nigeria: Impact Of Icts," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 11(1-2), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:apstra:265593
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.265593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/265593/files/14_APSTRACT_2017_01-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/265593/files/14_APSTRACT_2017_01-02.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.265593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorward, Andrew, 2013. "Agricultural labour productivity, food prices and sustainable development impacts and indicators," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 40-50.
    2. Eva Hagsten & Anna Sabadash, 2014. "The Impact of Highly-skilled ICT Labour on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Six European Countries," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2014-02, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Gutierrez, Luciano, 2002. "Why is Agricultural Labour Productivity higher in some countries than others?," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Signe Balina & Kristine Rozite & Inna Steinbuka, 2017. "ICT Industry's Challenge in Latvia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 802-814.
    2. Tetiana L Mostenska & Tetiana G Mostenska & Eduard Yurii & Zoltán Lakner & László Vasa, 2022. "Economic affordability of food as a component of the economic security of Ukraine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Fabian Capitanio & Giorgia Rivieccio & Felice Adinolfi, 2020. "Food Price Volatility and Asymmetries in Rural Areas of South Mediterranean Countries: A Copula-Based GARCH Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Torres Franco, Nicolás Arturo & Dávalos, Eleonora & Morales, Leonardo Fabio, 2021. "Heterogeneous Effects of Agricultural Technical Assistance in Colombia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 459-481, November.
    5. Nilsson, Pia & Bommarco, Riccardo & Hansson, Helena & Kuns, Brian & Schaak, Henning, 2022. "Farm performance and input self-sufficiency increases with functional crop diversity on Swedish farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Baležentis, Tomas & Li, Tianxiang & Chen, Xueli, 2021. "Has agricultural labor restructuring improved agricultural labor productivity in China? A decomposition approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Volkov, Artiom & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Balezentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2022. "Are agricultural sustainability and resilience complementary notions? Evidence from the North European agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Dafni Despoina Avgoustaki & George Xydis, 2020. "Indoor Vertical Farming in the Urban Nexus Context: Business Growth and Resource Savings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Vardges Hovhannisyan & Marin Bozic, 2017. "Price Endogeneity and Food Demand in Urban China," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 386-406, June.
    10. Ogunlesi, Ayodeji & Bokana, Koye & Okoye, Chidozie & Loy, Jens-Peter, 2018. "Agricultural Productivity and Food Supply Stability in Sub-Saharan Africa: LSDV and SYS-GMM Approach," MPRA Paper 90204, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Sassi, Maria, 2007. "Structural Change And Economic Convergence Across The Eu-15 Regions: Can The Agricultural Sector Play a Role?," 81st Annual Conference, April 2-4, 2007, Reading University, UK 7961, Agricultural Economics Society.
    12. Feeney, Roberto & MacClay, Pablo, 2016. "Food Security in Argentina: A Production or Distribution Problem?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-32, May.
    13. Surya Bhushan, 2021. "Labour Productivity Dynamics in Indian Agriculture: 2000–2016," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 64(2), pages 371-388, June.
    14. Baldos, Uris Lantz & Thomas Hertel, 2014. "Bursting the Bubble: A Long Run Perspective on Crop Commodity Prices," GTAP Working Papers 4574, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    15. Rios-Flores, Jose Luis & Navarrete-Molina, Cayetano, 2017. "Huella hídrica y productividad económica del agua en Nogal Pecanero (Carya illinoiensis) al sur oeste de Coahuila, México /Water Footprint and Economic Productivity of Water in Pecan (Carya Illinoiens," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 35, pages 697-716, Agosto.
    16. Ahmad Bathaei & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Hansen, Henning Otte, 2019. "The agricultural treadmill - a way out through differentiation? An empirical analysis of organic farming and the agricultural treadmill," MPRA Paper 98210, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Konrad Michalski, 2021. "Changes in Energy Consumption in Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Hassan, F., 2018. "Farm Wage and Rice Price Dynamics in Bangladesh," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277415, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:apstra:265593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.apstract.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.