IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sorghum Farmers’ Access to Agricultural Information Related to Water Stress Adaptation Strategies through ICTs in the Semi-arid Region of Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Abou, S.
  • Madi, A.
  • Njomaha, C.
  • Wakponou, A.
  • Mcopiyo, L.
  • Thu, T. B. Thi
  • Espiritu, F. U.

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of farmers' access to agricultural information through Information and Communication Technologies (radio, telephone, agricultural magazines). The purpose of this research work is to assess sorghum farmers' access to ICTs, and ICTs’ contribution to the diffusion of agricultural information related to water stress adaptation strategies. The study was conducted in the Diamaré division from September 2011 to December 2014. The choice of the study area and sites was influenced by both ICTs’ access and sorghum production basins. In all six hundred farms’ household heads from twenty villages were randomly selected and submitted a questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (W Kendall test of agreement, chi-square test). It appears that radio is the farmers’ most used and most preferred ICT, while agricultural magazines are perceived as the most effective ICT in terms of dissemination of information related to water stress adaptation strategies. The phone is the ICT that has mostly contributed to the effective diffusion of the water stress adaptation strategies currently in use by farmers. The ICTs’ features that attract farmers include diversity of broadcast languages, diversity of agricultural information disseminated, and ability to facilitate direct communication between actors. To promote broad dissemination of agricultural innovations through ICTs, agricultural stakeholders must consider all the above results, while integrating farmers and journalists in all phases of the process. The integration of the agricultural innovations’ diffusion through ICTs in the agricultural policies and the ITCs’ operators’ agendas is a priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Abou, S. & Madi, A. & Njomaha, C. & Wakponou, A. & Mcopiyo, L. & Thu, T. B. Thi & Espiritu, F. U., 2016. "Sorghum Farmers’ Access to Agricultural Information Related to Water Stress Adaptation Strategies through ICTs in the Semi-arid Region of Cameroon," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 12(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357236/files/Abou1232015AJAEES17195.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behrman, Julia & Beintema, Nienke & Biermayr-Jenzano, Patricia & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Noordeloos, Marco & Quisumbing, Agnes & Ragasa, Catherine & Wilde, Vicki, 2011. "Engendering agricultural research, development, and extension," Research reports ruthmeinzen-dick, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin & Oreoluwa Ola & Hannes Lang & Gertrud Buchenrieder, 2021. "Public-private cooperation and agricultural development in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of Nigerian growth enhancement scheme and e-voucher program," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(1), pages 129-140, February.
    2. Hannah Gichungi & Beatrice Muriithi & Patrick Irungu & Gracious Diiro & John Busienei, 2021. "Effect of Technological Innovation on Gender Roles: The Case of Fruit Fly IPM Adoption on Women’s Decision-Making in Mango Production and Marketing in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 407-426, June.
    3. Mamta Mehar & Takashi Yamano & Architesh Panda, 2017. "The Role of Gender, Risk, and Time Preferences in Farmers' Rice Variety Selection in Eastern India," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 14(1), pages 17-36, June.
    4. Rickards, Chima & Marenya, Paswel & Chiduwa, Mazvita & Eitzinger, Anton & Fisher, Monica & Snapp, Sieglinde, 2025. "Enhancing farmers' agency is a more effective extension paradigm: The case of soil health management in Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Mahbub Hossain & M. Niaz Asadullah & Uma Kambhampati, 2021. "Women’s empowerment and gender-differentiated food allocation in Bangladesh," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 739-767, September.
    6. Jayson N. Olayta & Roscefe B. Dy, 2025. "Modalities, Effectiveness and Accessibility of Extension Services Delivered to the Clienteles in the Municipality of Guinobatan, Province of Albay," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 2524-2533, September.
    7. Khed, Vijayalaxmi D. & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2023. "Agency and time poverty: Linking decision-making powers and leisure time of male and female farmers of Central India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    8. repec:ags:afgend:362655 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sarah Lyon & Tad Mutersbaugh & Holly Worthen, 2017. "The triple burden: the impact of time poverty on women’s participation in coffee producer organizational governance in Mexico," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 317-331, June.
    10. Mangheni, Margaret Najjingo & Musiimenta, Peace & Boonabaana, Brenda & Tufan, Hale Ann, . "Tracking the gender responsiveness of agricultural research across the research cycle: a monitoring and evaluation framework tested in Uganda and Rwanda," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 6(02).
    11. Tambo, Justice & Matimelo, Mathews & Ndhlovu, Mathias & Mbugua, Fredrick & Phiri, Noah, 2021. "Who Benefits? the Gender-Differentiated Impacts of Plant Clinics in Zambia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315871, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. repec:ags:aaea21:338775 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lemlem Aregu & Afrina Choudhury & Surendran Rajaratnam & Catherine Locke & Cynthia McDougall, 2018. "Gender Norms and Agricultural Innovation: Insights from Six Villages in Bangladesh," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 270-270, July.
    14. Elizabeth Waithanji & Nadhem Mtimet & Pauline Muindi, 2019. "Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia Vaccine Delivery and Adoption by Women and Men in North-Eastern Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(3), pages 364-387, July.
    15. Mbongeni Maziya & Maxwell Mudhara & Joyce Chitja, 2017. "What factors determine household food security among smallholder farmers? Insights from Msinga, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 40-52, January.
    16. Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Els Lecoutere & Alessandra Galiè & Bjorn Van Campenhout & Marlène Elias & Markus Ihalainen & Lara Roeven & Preeti Bharati & Ana Maria Paez Valencia & Mary Crossland & Barbara, 2023. "Methodologies for Researching Feminization of Agriculture: What Do They Tell Us?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(3), pages 294-316, July.
    17. Cees Leeuwis & Birgit K. Boogaard & Kwesi Atta-Krah, 2021. "How food systems change (or not): governance implications for system transformation processes," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(4), pages 761-780, August.
    18. Hannah Gichungi & Beatrice Muriithi & Patrick Irungu & Gracious Diiro & John Busienei, 0. "Effect of Technological Innovation on Gender Roles: The Case of Fruit Fly IPM Adoption on Women’s Decision-Making in Mango Production and Marketing in Kenya," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    19. Gouse, Marnus & Sengupta, Debdatta & Zambrano, Patricia & Zepeda, José Falck, 2016. "Genetically Modified Maize: Less Drudgery for Her, More Maize for Him? Evidence from Smallholder Maize Farmers in South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 27-38.
    20. Sarah Lyon & Tad Mutersbaugh & Holly Worthen, 2019. "Constructing the female coffee farmer: Do corporate smart‐economic initiatives promote gender equity within agricultural value chains?," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 34-47, January.
    21. repec:ags:afgend:362666 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Losira Nasirumbi Sanya & Reuben Tendo Ssali & Mary Gorreth Namuddu & Miriam Kyotalimye & Pricilla Marimo & Sarah Mayanja, 2023. "Why Gender Matters in Breeding: Lessons from Cooking Bananas in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    23. Mukhebi, Dorothy & de Villiers, Santie & Okoth, Sheila & Wilde, Vicki & Nkwake, Apollo M., . "Building science skills to improve the contributions of women to agricultural research and development in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 2(01).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.