IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357145.html

Perception of Arable Crop Farmers on Usage of Organic Fertilizer in Maize Production in Ido Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adeniran, A. A.
  • Fato, B. F.
  • Abegunrin, O. O.
  • Oyewole, M. B.

Abstract

One major problem facing maize production can be attributed to the fertility status of most Nigerian soils which is considerably low. The study was conducted to examine arable crop farmers’ perception of the use of organic fertilizer in maize production in Ido Local Government Area of Oyo State. A total of one hundred and twenty respondents were randomly selected for the study from 10 villages. Primary data were collected using a well-structured questionnaire and interview guide. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentages and mean. Chi-square was used to test the hypothesis of the study. Poultry manure (90.0%) was the major source of organic fertilizer and constitutes the most frequently used (70.8%). It was found that bulkiness of organic fertilizer was the most severe constraint that affect its usage (x=2.43). However, there was an unfavourable perception on use of organic fertilizer in maize production. Test of hypothesis revealed that age (χ2= 4.46, df= 1) and educational level (χ2= 8.54, df = 3) were found significantly related with the perception of respondents on usage of organic fertilizer (p = 0.05). Advocacy should be intensified on usage of organic fertilizer in crop production.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeniran, A. A. & Fato, B. F. & Abegunrin, O. O. & Oyewole, M. B., 2017. "Perception of Arable Crop Farmers on Usage of Organic Fertilizer in Maize Production in Ido Local Government Area of Oyo State, Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 16(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357145/files/Adeniran1632016AJAEES29934.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wheeler, Sarah Ann, 2008. "What influences agricultural professionals' views towards organic agriculture?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 145-154, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    2. Jinxia Wang & Yunfeng Tan & Qiong Hu & Huarong Cheng & Fang Gao, 2024. "Research on talent cultivation for rural revitalization based on three-party evolutionary game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Marsy Asindu & Emily Ouma & Gabriel Elepu & Diego Naziri, 2020. "Farmer Demand and Willingness-To-Pay for Sweetpotato Silage-Based Diet as Pig Feed in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Mercedes Beltrán-Esteve & Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo & Ernest Reig-Martínez, 2012. "What makes a citrus farmer go organic? Empirical evidence from Spanish citrus farming," Working Papers 1205, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    5. Federica Caffaro & Eugenio Cavallo, 2019. "The Effects of Individual Variables, Farming System Characteristics and Perceived Barriers on Actual Use of Smart Farming Technologies: Evidence from the Piedmont Region, Northwestern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Arpaphan Pattanapant & Ganesh P. Shivakoti, 2009. "Opportunities and constraints of organic agriculture in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 16(1), pages 115-147, June.
    7. Kristin Jürkenbeck & Achim Spiller, 2020. "Consumers’ Evaluation of Stockfree-Organic Agriculture—A Segmentation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Karin Schiller & James Montgomery & Marcus Randall & Andrew Lewis & Muhammad Shahinur Alam, 2025. "Optimising Long-Range Agricultural Land Use Under Climate Uncertainty," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Małgorzata Pink & Michał Niewiadomski & Katarzyna Grochola & Anna Gorczyca, 2024. "Producers’ Perception of the Benefits of Farm Certification: The Case of the National Good Agricultural Practices Programme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Geoff Kaine & Vic Wright, 2025. "Farm Context and Farmers’ Perceptions of the Compatibility, Complexity and Relative Advantage of Innovations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Anastasiadis, Foivos & Kolympari, Petroula, 2019. "Sustainable or conventional production? The influence of farmer demographic characteristics," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 2).
    12. Yaghoubi, Jafar & Yazdanpanah, Masoud & Komendantova, Nadejda, 2019. "Iranian agriculture advisors' perception and intention toward biofuel: Green way toward energy security, rural development and climate change mitigation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 452-459.
    13. Ralph De Witte & Dirk Janssen & Samir Sayadi Gmada & Carmen García-García, 2023. "Best Practices for Training in Sustainable Greenhouse Horticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Shepherd, Dean A. & Kuskova, Valya & Patzelt, Holger, 2009. "Measuring the values that underlie sustainable development: The development of a valid scale," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 246-256, April.
    15. Araba, Narjiss, 2022. "Organic markets: a safe haven from volatility," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321209, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    16. Aeberhard, Andrea & Rist, Stephan, 2009. "Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1171-1181, February.
    17. Pechrova, M., . "Determinants of the Farmers’ Conversion to Organic and Biodynamic Agriculture," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(4), pages 1-8.
    18. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Classifying carbon credit buyers according to their attitudes towards and involvement in CDM sustainability labels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6271-6279, October.
    19. Daniel López-García & Laura Calvet-Mir & Marina Masso & Josep Espluga, 2019. "Multi-actor networks and innovation niches: university training for local Agroecological Dynamization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(3), pages 567-579, September.
    20. Taheri, Fatemeh & D'Haese, Marijke & Fiems, Dieter & Azadi, Hossein, 2022. "The intentions of agricultural professionals towards diffusing wireless sensor networks: Application of technology acceptance model in Southwest Iran," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.