IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357027.html

Economic Analysis of Maize Production and Marketing in Khammam District, Telangana

Author

Listed:
  • Srikanth, B.
  • Kausadikar, H. H.
  • Jondhale, R. N.
  • Gandhi, N.

Abstract

Maize is the most important cereal and it is mostly used as grain, feed, fodder, starch and industrial products. In the present study, an attempt was made to calculate the cost of cultivation, find out resource use efficiency, price spread and market efficiency of maize in different marketing channels and to find out constraints in production and marketing of hybrid maize in the study area. The study area selected was Chinthakani mandal of Khammam (dist.). A multi-stage sampling method involving a combination of purposive and random sampling procedures was employed in drawing up the sample block, villages and farmers for collecting primary data. Sixty farmers (23 marginal, 20 small and 17 large) were selected at random by proportional probability sampling technique. In the study Maximum likelihood Estimation (MLE) technique was used in stochastic frontier production for finding out the technical efficiency. The coefficients of stochastic regression model were used to calculate the Marginal Value Product of Variable Inputs (MVP) and its ratio R with Marginal Factor Cost (MFC) used to determine resource use efficiency (RUE). The price spread was applied to measure the degree of pricing efficiency, marketing costs; market margins to calculate Index of the marketing efficiency (MEI). Total fixed cost for marginal, small and medium farmer are Rs.7337.43, Rs.7281.84 and Rs.7261.11 respectively .The benefit cost ratio is Maximum in case of medium farmers with at 2.7:1, followed by small farm (2.5:1) and marginal farmers (1.5:1). The gross returns from a hectare land are highest in case of medium farm with Rs 89364.63, followed by small (75396.54) and marginal (64845.89). A significant difference indicates sub-optimal allocation of resource. Labour, fertilizer and machine are under-utilized in the study area. The study suggested that a well-built strong infrastructure provision with efficient use of inputs and without marketing malpractices would show the way to an economically well-built maize economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Srikanth, B. & Kausadikar, H. H. & Jondhale, R. N. & Gandhi, N., 2017. "Economic Analysis of Maize Production and Marketing in Khammam District, Telangana," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 20(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357027/files/Gandhi2042017AJAEES36324.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vo Hung Son, Tran & Coelli, Tim & Fleming, Euan, 1993. "Analysis of the technical efficiency of state rubber farms in Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 183-201, September.
    2. Battese, G E & Coelli, T J, 1995. "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 325-332.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Firna Varina & Sri Hartoyo & Nunung Kusnadi & Amzul Rifin, 2020. "The Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Oil Palm Smallholders in Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 89-93.
    2. Rouven E. Haschka, 2024. "Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models with 'wrong' skewness: copula approach without external instruments," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(3), pages 807-826, July.
    3. Tim J. Coelli, 1995. "Recent Developments In Frontier Modelling And Efficiency Measurement," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(3), pages 219-245, December.
    4. Ofori-Bah, Adeline & Asafu-Adjaye, John, 2011. "Scope economies and technical efficiency of cocoa agroforesty systems in Ghana," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1508-1518, June.
    5. Dhungana, Basanta R. & Nuthall, Peter L. & Nartea, Gilbert V., 2004. "Measuring the economic inefficiency of Nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(2), pages 1-23.
    6. Hai-Dang Nguyen & Thanh Ngo & Tu DQ Le & Huong Ho & Hai T.H. Nguyen, 2019. "The Role of Knowledge in Sustainable Agriculture: Evidence from Rice Farms’ Technical Efficiency in Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, April.
    7. Krasachat, Wirat, "undated". "Technical Inefficiency of Chili Farms in Thailand," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258655, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Tijani, A.A., 2006. "Analysis of the technical efficiency of rice farms in Ijesha Land of Osun State, Nigeria," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 45(2), pages 1-10, June.
    9. Rouven E. Haschka, 2024. "“Wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors in stochastic frontier models: an instrument-free copula approach with an application to estimate firm efficiency in Vietnam," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 71-90, August.
    10. repec:aen:journl:ej34-2-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Satya Paul & Sriram Shankar, 2020. "Estimating efficiency effects in a panel data stochastic frontier model," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 163-180, April.
    12. repec:ags:cfcp15:344277 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Barra, Cristian & Lagravinese, Raffaele & Zotti, Roberto, 2015. "Explaining (in)efficiency in higher education: a comparison of parametric and non-parametric analyses to rank universities," MPRA Paper 67119, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Khush Bukhat Zahid, 2023. "Household Market Participation, Access, and Farm Productivity in AJK: Evidence from Farm Household Data," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 375-394.
    15. Rahman, Sanzidur, 2003. "Profit efficiency among Bangladeshi rice farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5-6), pages 487-503.
    16. Imori, Denise & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Postali, Fernando Antonio Slaibe, 2012. "Production efficiency of family farms and business farms in the Brazilian regions," MPRA Paper 46995, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Roberto Balado‐Naves & María A. García‐Valiñas & David Roibás Alonso, 2025. "Assessing the efficiency of residential water demand: The role of information," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 556-585, May.
    18. Massimo Filippini & William Greene, 2016. "Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 187-196, April.
    19. Lelethu Mdoda & Ajuruchukwu Obi & Zoleka Ncoyini-Manciya & Mzuyanda Christian & Anele Mayekiso, 2022. "Assessment of Profit Efficiency for Spinach Production under Small-Scale Irrigated Agriculture in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Maria Raimondo & Francesco Caracciolo & Concetta Nazzaro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2021. "Organic Farming Increases the Technical Efficiency of Olive Farms in Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    21. Trigo Gamarra, Lucinda, 2008. "The effects of liberalization and deregulation on the performance of financial institutions: The case of the German life insurance market," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 93, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    22. Danuse Nerudova & Marian Dobranschi, 2019. "Alternative method to measure the VAT gap in the EU: Stochastic tax frontier model approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-38, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.