IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/348182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological differences in South African sheep production: a stochastic meta-frontier analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Matthews, Nicolette
  • Conradie, Beatrice
  • Piesse, Jenifer

Abstract

This study compared four South African sheep producing districts relative to each other and a common metafrontier to analyse within and between group efficiency and explored what could be learnt from this technique compared to simple frontiers. A sample was compiled from sources that were previously successfully used in local benchmarking exercises, and despite very modest sample sizes at the group level and minimal information on how groups differ, the group models performed adequately while the meta-model performed very well. The results revealed that while within group performances were comparable across districts, there were huge differences in between group performance. These differences are partly attributable to natural resource endowments, but institutional arrangements also contribute significantly to local success. This suggests that to achieve rural regeneration public–private partnerships are necessary to address this issue. State support is insufficient and producer organisations have a major role in promoting institutional innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthews, Nicolette & Conradie, Beatrice & Piesse, Jenifer, 2023. "Technological differences in South African sheep production: a stochastic meta-frontier analysis," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 62(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:348182
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348182/files/Technological%20differences%20in%20South%20African%20sheep%20production%20%20a%20stochastic%20meta-frontier%20analysis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:348182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.