IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjecr/362936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Gender and Race Non-linear Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from Threshold Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Unknown

Abstract

This study employed South African data from 2008Q1 to 2021Q1 and a combination of OLS, FMOLS and threshold regression to test the validity of the existence or absence of a nonlinear Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis across race and gender, with the goal of determining whether the relationship between the unemployment rate and labour force participation rate is dependent on the unemployment regimes. The threshold regression results revealed that the relationship between unemployment and labour force participation varies by regimes. In other words, the impact of unemployment on labour force participation varies by gender and race and depends on the state of unemployment. In most cases, the discouraged worker hypothesis dominates, particularly at high unemployment rates (beyond predicted thresholds). This indicates that the relationship between the labour force participation rate and unemployment across different categories is dependent on the characteristics of the South African labour market, which is marked by structural and cyclical unemployment with structural inequities across races, sectors and groups. As a result, a persistently high unemployment rate in the South African labour market may lead to lower labour force participation, exacerbating the existing unemployment problem and eventually leading to permanent unemployment. Given our findings, the South African government should pursue substantial labour reforms that include educating and retraining existing unemployed workers, as well as creating an enabling environment conducive to job creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Unknown, 2024. "Testing Gender and Race Non-linear Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from Threshold Regression," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 13(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:362936
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.362936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362936/files/ajol-file-journals_540_articles_290589_67c97698a3ac2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.362936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:362936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.