IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjecr/362936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Gender and Race Non-linear Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from Threshold Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Unknown

Abstract

This study employed South African data from 2008Q1 to 2021Q1 and a combination of OLS, FMOLS and threshold regression to test the validity of the existence or absence of a nonlinear Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis across race and gender, with the goal of determining whether the relationship between the unemployment rate and labour force participation rate is dependent on the unemployment regimes. The threshold regression results revealed that the relationship between unemployment and labour force participation varies by regimes. In other words, the impact of unemployment on labour force participation varies by gender and race and depends on the state of unemployment. In most cases, the discouraged worker hypothesis dominates, particularly at high unemployment rates (beyond predicted thresholds). This indicates that the relationship between the labour force participation rate and unemployment across different categories is dependent on the characteristics of the South African labour market, which is marked by structural and cyclical unemployment with structural inequities across races, sectors and groups. As a result, a persistently high unemployment rate in the South African labour market may lead to lower labour force participation, exacerbating the existing unemployment problem and eventually leading to permanent unemployment. Given our findings, the South African government should pursue substantial labour reforms that include educating and retraining existing unemployed workers, as well as creating an enabling environment conducive to job creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Unknown, 2024. "Testing Gender and Race Non-linear Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis in South Africa: Evidence from Threshold Regression," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 13(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:362936
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.362936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362936/files/ajol-file-journals_540_articles_290589_67c97698a3ac2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.362936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aysit Tansel & Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir & Emre Aksoy, 2016. "Unemployment and labour force participation in Turkey," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 184-187, February.
    2. Amaia Altuzarra & Catalina Gálvez Gálvez & Ana González Flores, 2019. "Unemployment and labour force participation in Spain," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 345-350, March.
    3. Abhijit Banerjee & Sebastian Galiani & Jim Levinsohn & Zoë McLaren & Ingrid Woolard, 2008. "Why has unemployment risen in the New South Africa?1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 16(4), pages 715-740, October.
    4. Elsby, Michael W.L. & Hobijn, Bart & Şahin, Ayşegül, 2015. "On the importance of the participation margin for labor market fluctuations," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 64-82.
    5. Francesco Nemore & Rocco Caferra & Andrea Morone, 2021. "Unemployment and labor force participation in Italy," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1440-1449, May.
    6. Sibel Cengiz & Afsin Sahin, 2014. "Modelling nonlinear behavior of labor force participation rate by STAR: An application for Turkey," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 7(1), pages 113-127, April.
    7. Bruce E. Hansen, 2000. "Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 575-604, May.
    8. Hansen, Bruce E, 1996. "Inference When a Nuisance Parameter Is Not Identified under the Null Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 413-430, March.
    9. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    10. Rowthorn, Robert, 1999. "Unemployment, Wage Bargaining and Capital-Labour Substitution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(4), pages 413-425, July.
    11. Walter Paternesi Meloni, 2024. "Is labour force participation independent of unemployment? A panel analysis for high-income countries," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(6), pages 1191-1208, February.
    12. Makoto Kakinaka & Hiroaki Miyamoto, 2012. "Unemployment and labour force participation in Japan," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(11), pages 1039-1043, July.
    13. Iman Cheratian & Saleh Goltabar & Carla Daniela Calá, 2022. "The unemployment–labor force participation linkage in Iran’s women labor market," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 218-236, March.
    14. Österholm, Pär, 2010. "Unemployment and labour-force participation in Sweden," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 205-208, March.
    15. Nombulelo Gumata & Eliphas Ndou, 2017. "Labour Market and Fiscal Policy Adjustments to Shocks," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-66520-7, March.
    16. Marika Karanassou & Dennis J. Snower, 2004. "Unemployment Invariance," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 5(3), pages 297-317, August.
    17. Congregado, Emilio & Carmona, Monica & Golpe, Antonio A. & Van Stel, André, 2014. "Unemployment, Gender and Labor Force Participation in Spain: Future Trends in Labor Market," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 53-66, March.
    18. Veli Yilanci & Onder Ozgur, 2024. "Unemployment and Labour Force Participation in South Korea: Johansen-Type Cointegration Analysis with a Fourier Approach," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(1), pages 122-141.
    19. Emerson, Jamie, 2011. "Unemployment and labor force participation in the United States," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 203-206, June.
    20. Kingdon, Geeta Gandhi & Knight, John, 2004. "Unemployment in South Africa: The Nature of the Beast," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 391-408, March.
    21. Lee, Grace H.Y. & Parasnis, Jaai, 2014. "Discouraged workers in developed countries and added workers in developing countries? Unemployment rate and labour force participation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 90-98.
    22. Layard, Richard & Nickell, Stephen & Jackman, Richard, 2005. "Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199279173.
    23. Mercy Laita Palamuleni, 2017. "The Unemployment Invariant Hypothesis: Heterogenous Panel Cointegration Evidence From U.S. State Level Data," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 414-419.
    24. Dickey, David A & Fuller, Wayne A, 1981. "Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 1057-1072, June.
    25. Maridueña-Larrea, Ángel & Martín-Román, Ángel L., 2023. "The asymmetric cyclical behaviour of female labour force participation in Latin America," MPRA Paper 117408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    26. Alan B. Krueger & Judd Cramer & David Cho, 2014. "Are the Long-Term Unemployed on the Margins of the Labor Market?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 45(1 (Spring), pages 229-299.
    27. Neftci, Salih N, 1984. "Are Economic Time Series Asymmetric over the Business Cycle?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(2), pages 307-328, April.
    28. Phuong Nguyen Van, 2016. "Examining the Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis: The Case of Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 49(1), pages 54-58, March.
    29. Emilio Congregado & Ewa Gałecka-Burdziak & Antonio Golpe & Robert Pater, 2020. "Asymmetry and Non-linearity in Discouraged and Added Worker Effects," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 221-241, May.
    30. Ibrahim Arisoy, 2018. "An Empirical Examination of Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis, Discouraged and Added Worker Effects in Turkey," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 11-14.
    31. Liu, De-Chih, 2014. "The link between unemployment and labor force participation rates in Japan: A regional perspective," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 52-58.
    32. Isiaka Akande Raifu & Oluwafemi Mathew Adeboje, 2022. "Labour force participation and unemployment rate: does discouraged worker effect hypothesis or unemployment invariance hypothesis hold in Africa?," African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 284-305, March.
    33. Aysit Tansel & Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir, 2018. "Unemployment invariance hypothesis, added and discouraged worker effects in Canada," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 929-936, October.
    34. Magejo, Prudence & Benhura, Miracle & Mudiriza, Gibson, 2020. "Former Homeland Areas and Unemployment in South Africa: A Decomposition Approach," IZA Discussion Papers 12941, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    35. Alan B. Krueger & Judd Cramer & David Cho, 2014. "Are the Long-Term Unemployed on the Margins of the Labor Market?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(1 (Spring), pages 229-299.
    36. Lee, Cheng-Feng, 2010. "Testing for unemployment hysteresis in nonlinear heterogeneous panels: International evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1097-1102, September.
    37. Chen, Sheng-Tung & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2005. "Government size and economic growth in Taiwan: A threshold regression approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 1051-1066, December.
    38. Emilio Congregado & Ewa Galecka-Burdziak & Antonio A. Golpe & Robert Pater, 2021. "Separating aggregate discouraged and added worker effects: the case of a former transition country," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(3), pages 729-760, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maridueña-Larrea, Ángel & Martín-Román, Ángel L., 2025. "Unemployment invariance hypothesis and labor supply: a test for 31 American countries," MPRA Paper 125831, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Muhammad zaheer Khan & Rusmawati Said & Sadaf Amjad, 2024. "Relationship between labor force participation and unemployment in Pakistan," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(1), pages 264-272.
    3. Martín-Román, Ángel L., 2022. "Beyond the added-worker and the discouraged-worker effects: the entitled-worker effect," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Josh Beverly & Shamar L. Stewart & Clinton L. Neill, 2025. "The Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis in West Virginia: A Tale of Two Indicators," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 1287-1314, September.
    5. Maridueña-Larrea, Ángel & Martín-Román, Ángel L., 2023. "The unemployment invariance hypothesis and the implications of added and discouraged worker effects in Latin America," MPRA Paper 115966, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Nicholas Apergis & Ibrahim Arisoy, 2017. "Unemployment and labor force participation across the US States: new evidence from panel data," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(4), pages 45-84, October-D.
    7. Congregado, Emilio & Gałecka-Burdziak, Ewa & Golpe, Antonio A. & Pater, Robert, 2021. "Unemployment invariance hypothesis and structural breaks in Poland," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    8. Aysit Tansel & Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir, 2018. "Unemployment invariance hypothesis, added and discouraged worker effects in Canada," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 929-936, October.
    9. Aysit Tansel & Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir, 2016. "Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis, Added and Discouraged Worker Effects in Canada?," ERC Working Papers 1717, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Dec 2017.
    10. Jamie Emerson, 2023. "Education, employment, and labor force participation in the United States," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 43(3), pages 1377-1388.
    11. Paternesi Meloni, Walter & Romaniello, Davide & Stirati, Antonella, 2022. "Inflation and the NAIRU: assessing the role of long-term unemployment as a cause of hysteresis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Marika Karanassou & Hector Sala, 2010. "Labour Market Dynamics in Australia: What Drives Unemployment?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 86(273), pages 185-209, June.
    13. Walter Paternesi Meloni & Antonella Stirati, 2023. "The decoupling between labour compensation and productivity in high‐income countries: Why is the nexus broken?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 425-463, June.
    14. Ibrahim Arisoy, 2018. "An Empirical Examination of Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis, Discouraged and Added Worker Effects in Turkey," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 11-14.
    15. Şule Akkoyunlu, 2024. "Testing Okun’s Law for Turkey (1923-2019)," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 113-132, April.
    16. Tansel, Aysit & Ozdemir, Zeynel Abidin & Aksoy, Emre, 2016. "Does Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis Hold for Canada?," MPRA Paper 72869, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Liu, De-Chih, 2014. "The link between unemployment and labor force participation rates in Japan: A regional perspective," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 52-58.
    18. Aysit Tansel & Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir & Emre Aksoy, 2016. "Does Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis Hold for Canada?," Working Papers 2016/3, Turkish Economic Association.
    19. Liu, De-chih, 2021. "The Unemployment Invariance Hypothesis: Does the Gender Matter?," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 62(2), pages 178-199, December.
    20. Emilio Congregado & Ewa Galecka-Burdziak & Antonio A. Golpe & Robert Pater, 2021. "Separating aggregate discouraged and added worker effects: the case of a former transition country," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(3), pages 729-760, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:362936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.