IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/348257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching the Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Mixed Motive Bargaining Simulation Game

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattari, Anukul
  • Davis, George C.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattari, Anukul & Davis, George C., 2024. "Teaching the Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Mixed Motive Bargaining Simulation Game," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 6(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:348257
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348257/files/5%20Bhattari%20Full.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincent P. Crawford, 2003. "Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 133-149, March.
    2. Davis, George C. & Serrano, Elena L., 2016. "Food and Nutrition Economics: Fundamentals for Health Sciences," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199379118.
    3. Bryan W. Husted & José De Jesus Salazar, 2006. "Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 75-91, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hall, David, 2024. "Educational Materials Addressing Industry and Market Developments: Introduction to the Special Issue," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 6(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Ettinger & Philippe Jehiel, 2010. "A Theory of Deception," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    3. Konrad, Kai A. & Lohse, Tim & Qari, Salmai, 2014. "Deception choice and self-selection – The importance of being earnest," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 25-39.
    4. Timothy Shields, 2008. "Analysts, Incentives, and Exaggeration," CIRANO Working Papers 2008s-11, CIRANO.
    5. Navin Kartik, 2009. "Strategic Communication with Lying Costs," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(4), pages 1359-1395.
    6. Ana Paula Pereira dos Passos & Jeferson Lana & Rosilene Marcon, 2023. "Social and political capabilities as nonmarket activities: What are they and how do firms develop them?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2718-2730, November.
    7. Ju Liu & Bo Bengtsson & Helena Bohman & Karin Staffansson Pauli, 2020. "A System Model and An Innovation Approach toward Sustainable Housing Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Joseph Tao-yi Wang & Michael Spezio & Colin F. Camerer, 2006. "Pinocchio's Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation to Understand Truth-telling and Deception in Games," Levine's Bibliography 321307000000000042, UCLA Department of Economics.
    9. David Ettinger & Philippe Jehiel, 2021. "An experiment on deception, reputation and trust," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 821-853, September.
    10. Dirk Boehe & Luciano Barin Cruz, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 325-346, February.
    11. Vincent P. Crawford & Miguel A. Costa-Gomes & Nagore Iriberri, 2013. "Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 5-62, March.
    12. Anica Zeyen & Markus Beckmann & Stella Wolters, 2016. "Actor and Institutional Dynamics in the Development of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 341-360, May.
    13. Róbert F. Veszteg, 2015. "Linking Decisions with Standardization," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 3(1), pages 35-48, June.
    14. Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt & Dimitar Zvezdov & Jacob Hörisch & Joanne Tingey-Holyoak, 2015. "Management Roles and Sustainability Information. Exploring Corporate Practice," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(4), pages 328-345, December.
    15. repec:cte:wbrepe:wb130301 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Sanchez-Pages, Santiago & Vorsatz, Marc, 2007. "An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender-receiver game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 86-112, October.
    17. Wei Li, 2010. "Peddling Influence through Intermediaries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 1136-1162, June.
    18. Arad, Ayala, 2008. "The Tennis Coach Problem: A Game-Theoretic and Experimental Study," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275711, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Sabrina Colombo & Marco Guerci & Toloue Miandar, 2019. "What Do Unions and Employers Negotiate Under the Umbrella of Corporate Social Responsibility? Comparative Evidence from the Italian Metal and Chemical Industries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 445-462, March.
    20. Rode, Julian, 2007. "Truth and Trust in Communication: An Experimental Study of Behavior under Asymmetric Information," Ratio Working Papers 111, The Ratio Institute.
    21. Elona ÇERA & Ales GREGAR & Jana MATOSKOVA & Zuhair ABBAS, 2021. "Responsible Competitiveness Factors And Competitive Advantage: A Socially Responsible - Hrm Perspective," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 660-668, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:348257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.