IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i68p214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility Decision-Making Considering Multiple Factors in a Duopoly Model

Author

Listed:
  • He Liang

    (Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China)

  • Xiaomin Sun

    (Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China)

  • Yanli Guo

    (Liaoning University, Shenyang, China)

Abstract

This study constructs a duopoly model considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), examines the results of different CSR decisions, and analyzes how factors like CSR level, tax rates, externalities, and consumer sensitivity affect results. The findings show that these factors have complex impacts and that the implementation of CSR can create a win-win situation under certain conditions. Firms should consider the CSR actions of their competitors and pay careful attention to taxes, externalities, and consumer sensitivity when making CSR decisions. Implementing CSR benefits firms when CSR levels and tax rates are within a specific range. When consumer sensitivity is high or negative externalities are large, it is conducive to promoting a more active implementation of CSR, thus helping firms obtain higher returns or reduce negative externalities.

Suggested Citation

  • He Liang & Xiaomin Sun & Yanli Guo, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility Decision-Making Considering Multiple Factors in a Duopoly Model," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(68), pages 214-214, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3394.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao, Xiaoli & Wen, Shufang & Li, Ke & Wu, Junwei & Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu, 2023. "Environmental governance, executive incentive, and enterprise performance: Evidence from Chinese mineral enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Chen, Tao & Dong, Hui & Lin, Chen, 2020. "Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 483-504.
    3. Hasan, Iftekhar & (Stan) Hoi, Chun-Keung & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2020. "Is social capital associated with corporate innovation? Evidence from publicly listed firms in the U.S," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Luciano Fanti & Domenico Buccella, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility in a game-theoretic context," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 371-390, September.
    5. Wu, Dejun & Lin, Chen & Liu, Sibo, 2016. "Does community environment matter to corporate social responsibility?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 127-135.
    6. Chun Keung Hoi & Qiang Wu & Hao Zhang, 2018. "Community Social Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 647-665, October.
    7. Bablu Kumar Dhar & Sabrina Maria Sarkar & Foster K. Ayittey, 2022. "Impact of social responsibility disclosure between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development: A study on heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 71-78, January.
    8. Zhe Ouyang & Ruixue Lv & Yang Liu, 2023. "Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during corporate environmental violation events?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1942-1952, July.
    9. Jhunru Zhang & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Terri Trireksani, 2019. "Corporate sustainability disclosure’s importance in China: financial analysts’ perception," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(8), pages 1169-1189, August.
    10. Bian, Junsong & Li, Kevin W. & Guo, Xiaolei, 2016. "A strategic analysis of incorporating CSR into managerial incentive design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 83-93.
    11. Junlong Chen & Xiaomeng Wang & Jiali Liu, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and capacity sharing in a duopoly model," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 512-517, March.
    12. Mingqing Xing & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2023. "Non‐cooperative and cooperative environmental R&D under environmental corporate social responsibility with green managerial coordination," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(5), pages 2684-2696, July.
    13. Karl V. Lins & Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2017. "Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1785-1824, August.
    14. Deng, Xin & Kang, Jun-koo & Low, Buen Sin, 2013. "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 87-109.
    15. Pu‐yan Nie & Chan Wang & Yan Meng, 2019. "An analysis of environmental corporate social responsibility," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 384-393, June.
    16. Marwa Samet & Khaireddine Mouakhar & Anis Jarboui, 2018. "Exploring the relationship between CSR performance and financial constraints: empirical evidence from European firms," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 480-508, October.
    17. Borghesi, Richard & Houston, Joel F. & Naranjo, Andy, 2014. "Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 164-181.
    18. Ajay Sharma, 2018. "A note on Stackelberg equilibrium in duopoly: Strategic use of corporate social responsibility," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(4), pages 1720-1726.
    19. Richard A. Bettis & Constance E. Helfat & J. Myles Shaver & Xiaoping Zhao & Audrey J. Murrell, 2016. "Revisiting the corporate social performance-financial performance link: A replication of Waddock and Graves," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(11), pages 2378-2388, November.
    20. Michael Kopel, 2015. "Price and Quantity Contracts in a Mixed Duopoly with a Socially Concerned Firm," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(8), pages 559-566, December.
    21. Pushpika Vishwanathan & Hans (J.) van Oosterhout & Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens & Patricio Duran & Marc van Essen, 2020. "Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 314-350, March.
    22. Yosra Makni Fourati & Mariam Dammak, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: International evidence of the mediating role of reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1749-1759, November.
    23. Lijuan Wu & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: From a Corporate Governance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daewoung Choi & Hyunju Shin & Kyoungmi Kim, 2023. "CEO’s Childhood Experience of Natural Disaster and CSR Activities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(2), pages 281-306, November.
    2. Hossain, Ashrafee Tanvir & Kryzanowski, Lawrence, 2021. "Political corruption and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    3. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    4. An, Heng & Boasson, Vigdis & Lei, Lijun & Wu, Qun, 2024. "Corporate social performance: Does management quality matter?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Gillan, Stuart L. & Koch, Andrew & Starks, Laura T., 2021. "Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Jongwon Park & Sunyoung Kim & Albert Tsang, 2023. "CEO Personal Hedging and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 199-221, January.
    7. Zhu, Hui & Wagner, Eva, 2024. "Is corporate social responsibility a matter of trust? A cross-country investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Ahsan Habib & Mabel D' Costa & Ahmed Khamis Al‐Hadi, 2023. "Consequences of local social norms: A review of the literature in accounting, finance, and corporate governance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 3-45, March.
    9. Choi, Changhwan & Chung, Chune Young, 2024. "The effect of shale gas booms on environmental CSR activity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    10. Li, Chengcheng & Wang, Xiaoqiong, 2022. "Local peer effects of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Zhang, Zhuang & Chizema, Amon & Kuo, Jing-Ming & Zhang, Qingjing, 2022. "Managerial risk-reducing incentives and social and exchange capital," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    12. Najah Attig & Wenyao Hu & Mohammad M. Rahaman & Ashraf Al Zaman, 2023. "Overselling corporate social responsibility," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 573-610, September.
    13. Nguyen, Hien T. & Phan, Hieu V. & Vo, Hong, 2023. "Agency problems and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from shareholder-creditor mergers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Aswani, Jitendra & Chidambaran, N.K. & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2021. "Who benefits from mandatory CSR? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    15. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    16. Hossain, Ashrafee & Hossain, Takdir & Jha, Anand & Mougoué, Mbodja, 2023. "Credit ratings and social capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Angelidis, Timotheos & Michairinas, Athanasios & Sakkas, Athanasios, 2024. "World ESG performance and economic activity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Jha, Anand & Kulchania, Manoj & Kwon, Min-Jeong, 2022. "Stock repurchasing and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. An-Pin Wei & Chi-Lu Peng & Hao-Chen Huang & Shang-Pao Yeh, 2020. "Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Performance: Does Customer Satisfaction Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Chahine, Salim & Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Mazboudi, Mohamad, 2019. "Entrenchment through corporate social responsibility: Evidence from CEO network centrality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CSR; duopoly; tax rate; negative externalities; consumer sensitivity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:68:p:214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.